Wegdan Mawlana, Mohamed Elhady, Attallah Alhoweiti, Asmaa Osman
{"title":"肺超声评分作为早产儿拔管失败的预测指标。","authors":"Wegdan Mawlana, Mohamed Elhady, Attallah Alhoweiti, Asmaa Osman","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extubation in preterm infants is a complex decision, and clinicians need to balance the risk of respiratory failure with the potential benefits of reducing mechanical ventilation. Lung ultrasound Score (LUS) has emerged as a promising tool to assist in this decision-making process. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of LUS score for successful extubation in preterm infants born < 35 weeks gestation.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>This is a prospective, observational study that was conducted on 77 preterm infants with gestational age < 35 weeks who were supported by invasive mechanical ventilation due to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). LUS was performed within 2 h before extubation and LUS score was calculated, receiver operating characteristic analysis (AUC) was done to get cut-off score, sensitivity, and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six babies (85.7%) were successfully extubated (ES) to noninvasive respiratory support while 11 babies (14.2%) failed extubation (EF) within the 72 h period from the onset of extubation. Pre-extubation LUS score was significantly higher (7.0 ± 2.75) in EF group compared to neonates in ES group (4.89 ± 1.81) with p < 0.05 (0.028). A cut-off LUS score > 6 had a sensitivity 78.5% and a specificity 67.7% (95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.89) to predict extubation failure. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 63.3%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 75%. The gestational age (GA) was 31.51 ± 2.9 in (ES) versus 29.90 ± 3.2 weeks in (EF) with no significant difference between both groups as well as birth weight (1661 ± 590 g vs. 1411 ± 47 g). Male sex represented 66% of the studied cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LUS score offers a modest predictive value for successful extubation in mechanically ventilated preterm infants. However, Its ease of use and real-time assessment make it a valuable addition to the clinical decision-making process in managing these fragile infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 10","pages":"e71352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung Ultrasound Score as a Predictor for Extubation Failure in Preterm Infants.\",\"authors\":\"Wegdan Mawlana, Mohamed Elhady, Attallah Alhoweiti, Asmaa Osman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.71352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extubation in preterm infants is a complex decision, and clinicians need to balance the risk of respiratory failure with the potential benefits of reducing mechanical ventilation. Lung ultrasound Score (LUS) has emerged as a promising tool to assist in this decision-making process. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of LUS score for successful extubation in preterm infants born < 35 weeks gestation.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>This is a prospective, observational study that was conducted on 77 preterm infants with gestational age < 35 weeks who were supported by invasive mechanical ventilation due to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). LUS was performed within 2 h before extubation and LUS score was calculated, receiver operating characteristic analysis (AUC) was done to get cut-off score, sensitivity, and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six babies (85.7%) were successfully extubated (ES) to noninvasive respiratory support while 11 babies (14.2%) failed extubation (EF) within the 72 h period from the onset of extubation. Pre-extubation LUS score was significantly higher (7.0 ± 2.75) in EF group compared to neonates in ES group (4.89 ± 1.81) with p < 0.05 (0.028). A cut-off LUS score > 6 had a sensitivity 78.5% and a specificity 67.7% (95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.89) to predict extubation failure. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 63.3%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 75%. The gestational age (GA) was 31.51 ± 2.9 in (ES) versus 29.90 ± 3.2 weeks in (EF) with no significant difference between both groups as well as birth weight (1661 ± 590 g vs. 1411 ± 47 g). Male sex represented 66% of the studied cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LUS score offers a modest predictive value for successful extubation in mechanically ventilated preterm infants. However, Its ease of use and real-time assessment make it a valuable addition to the clinical decision-making process in managing these fragile infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"60 10\",\"pages\":\"e71352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71352\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:早产儿拔管是一个复杂的决定,临床医生需要平衡呼吸衰竭的风险和减少机械通气的潜在好处。肺超声评分(LUS)已成为一种有前途的工具,以协助这一决策过程。本研究旨在评估LUS评分对早产儿拔管成功的预测价值。研究对象和方法:本研究是一项前瞻性观察性研究,对77例胎龄早产儿进行了研究。结果:66例(85.7%)婴儿在拔管开始后的72小时内成功拔管(ES)至无创呼吸支持,11例(14.2%)婴儿拔管失败(EF)。EF组拔管前LUS评分(7.0±2.75)明显高于ES组(4.89±1.81),且p6预测拔管失败的敏感性为78.5%,特异性为67.7%(95%可信区间:0.67 ~ 0.89)。阳性预测值(PPV) 63.3%,阴性预测值(NPV) 75%。胎龄(GA) (ES)为31.51±2.9周,(EF)为29.90±3.2周,两组新生儿出生体重(1661±590 g vs 1411±47 g)无显著差异。男性占研究队列的66%。结论:LUS评分对机械通气早产儿拔管成功与否具有一定的预测价值。然而,它的易用性和实时评估使其成为管理这些脆弱婴儿的临床决策过程中有价值的补充。
Lung Ultrasound Score as a Predictor for Extubation Failure in Preterm Infants.
Background: Extubation in preterm infants is a complex decision, and clinicians need to balance the risk of respiratory failure with the potential benefits of reducing mechanical ventilation. Lung ultrasound Score (LUS) has emerged as a promising tool to assist in this decision-making process. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of LUS score for successful extubation in preterm infants born < 35 weeks gestation.
Subjects and methods: This is a prospective, observational study that was conducted on 77 preterm infants with gestational age < 35 weeks who were supported by invasive mechanical ventilation due to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). LUS was performed within 2 h before extubation and LUS score was calculated, receiver operating characteristic analysis (AUC) was done to get cut-off score, sensitivity, and specificity.
Results: Sixty-six babies (85.7%) were successfully extubated (ES) to noninvasive respiratory support while 11 babies (14.2%) failed extubation (EF) within the 72 h period from the onset of extubation. Pre-extubation LUS score was significantly higher (7.0 ± 2.75) in EF group compared to neonates in ES group (4.89 ± 1.81) with p < 0.05 (0.028). A cut-off LUS score > 6 had a sensitivity 78.5% and a specificity 67.7% (95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.89) to predict extubation failure. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 63.3%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 75%. The gestational age (GA) was 31.51 ± 2.9 in (ES) versus 29.90 ± 3.2 weeks in (EF) with no significant difference between both groups as well as birth weight (1661 ± 590 g vs. 1411 ± 47 g). Male sex represented 66% of the studied cohort.
Conclusion: LUS score offers a modest predictive value for successful extubation in mechanically ventilated preterm infants. However, Its ease of use and real-time assessment make it a valuable addition to the clinical decision-making process in managing these fragile infants.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases.
PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.