社会支持是否能减轻非裔美国SLE患者的身体疼痛?一项随机对照试验的结果。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Jerik Leung, Everette P Keller, Paul Nietert, Tomika Caldwell, Clara L Dismuke-Greer, Hetlena Johnson, Edith Williams
{"title":"社会支持是否能减轻非裔美国SLE患者的身体疼痛?一项随机对照试验的结果。","authors":"Jerik Leung, Everette P Keller, Paul Nietert, Tomika Caldwell, Clara L Dismuke-Greer, Hetlena Johnson, Edith Williams","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2025-001712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Peer mentoring has been shown to be an effective intervention for chronic conditions with evidence to suggest that it might improve health-related bodily pain among African American women living with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, there is a lack of evidence to describe the intervention impact when adjusting for self-management of SLE. The present work aims to determine whether greater patient activation is associated with greater reductions in pain overall and within intervention groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were used from the Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-Management study, a randomised controlled trial designed to determine the efficacy of peer mentorship in African American women with SLE. A total of 274 participants were randomised to an intervention (mentorship) or control (non-mentorship) arms. Data were collected on self-reported Lupus Quality of Life questionnaire for bodily pain and Patient Activation Measure (PAM). Linear mixed models and multivariable linear mixed models were fit to assess the intervention and impact of PAM on bodily pain over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased patient activation was significantly associated with greater reductions in bodily pain (b=-0.13, p=0.019); however, there was no significant difference in intervention group over the study period between the intervention and control groups CONCLUSION: Patient self-management can have a significant effect on bodily pain for SLE patients. Future work aims to consider strategies which address patient activation as a mechanism for reducing pain and improving quality of life.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03734055.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does social support reduce bodily pain among African American women with SLE? Findings from a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jerik Leung, Everette P Keller, Paul Nietert, Tomika Caldwell, Clara L Dismuke-Greer, Hetlena Johnson, Edith Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/lupus-2025-001712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Peer mentoring has been shown to be an effective intervention for chronic conditions with evidence to suggest that it might improve health-related bodily pain among African American women living with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, there is a lack of evidence to describe the intervention impact when adjusting for self-management of SLE. The present work aims to determine whether greater patient activation is associated with greater reductions in pain overall and within intervention groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were used from the Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-Management study, a randomised controlled trial designed to determine the efficacy of peer mentorship in African American women with SLE. A total of 274 participants were randomised to an intervention (mentorship) or control (non-mentorship) arms. Data were collected on self-reported Lupus Quality of Life questionnaire for bodily pain and Patient Activation Measure (PAM). Linear mixed models and multivariable linear mixed models were fit to assess the intervention and impact of PAM on bodily pain over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased patient activation was significantly associated with greater reductions in bodily pain (b=-0.13, p=0.019); however, there was no significant difference in intervention group over the study period between the intervention and control groups CONCLUSION: Patient self-management can have a significant effect on bodily pain for SLE patients. Future work aims to consider strategies which address patient activation as a mechanism for reducing pain and improving quality of life.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03734055.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542739/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2025-001712\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2025-001712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:同伴指导已被证明是对慢性疾病的有效干预,有证据表明它可能改善患有系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的非裔美国妇女与健康相关的身体疼痛。然而,缺乏证据来描述在调整SLE自我管理时的干预影响。目前的工作旨在确定是否更大的患者激活与总体和干预组内疼痛的更大减轻有关。方法:数据来自狼疮自我管理的同伴方法研究,这是一项随机对照试验,旨在确定同伴指导对非裔美国SLE女性的疗效。共有274名参与者被随机分配到干预组(指导组)或对照组(非指导组)。收集狼疮患者自我报告的身体疼痛生活质量问卷和患者激活测量(PAM)数据。拟合线性混合模型和多变量线性混合模型来评估PAM对身体疼痛的干预和影响。结果:患者激活的增加与身体疼痛的减少显著相关(b=-0.13, p=0.019);结论:患者自我管理对SLE患者的躯体疼痛有显著影响。未来的工作旨在考虑将患者激活作为减轻疼痛和提高生活质量的机制的策略。试验注册号:NCT03734055。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does social support reduce bodily pain among African American women with SLE? Findings from a randomised controlled trial.

Objective: Peer mentoring has been shown to be an effective intervention for chronic conditions with evidence to suggest that it might improve health-related bodily pain among African American women living with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, there is a lack of evidence to describe the intervention impact when adjusting for self-management of SLE. The present work aims to determine whether greater patient activation is associated with greater reductions in pain overall and within intervention groups.

Methods: Data were used from the Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-Management study, a randomised controlled trial designed to determine the efficacy of peer mentorship in African American women with SLE. A total of 274 participants were randomised to an intervention (mentorship) or control (non-mentorship) arms. Data were collected on self-reported Lupus Quality of Life questionnaire for bodily pain and Patient Activation Measure (PAM). Linear mixed models and multivariable linear mixed models were fit to assess the intervention and impact of PAM on bodily pain over time.

Results: Increased patient activation was significantly associated with greater reductions in bodily pain (b=-0.13, p=0.019); however, there was no significant difference in intervention group over the study period between the intervention and control groups CONCLUSION: Patient self-management can have a significant effect on bodily pain for SLE patients. Future work aims to consider strategies which address patient activation as a mechanism for reducing pain and improving quality of life.

Trial registration number: NCT03734055.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信