一线化疗周期的不足使得接受avelumab维持治疗的转移性尿路上皮癌患者的生存结果很差:来自日本泌尿外科协会的研究结果。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Satoshi Katayama, Takehiro Iwata, Shingo Nishimura, Kensuke Bekku, Keita Kobayashi, Nakanori Fujii, Kenichi Nishimura, Noriyoshi Miura, Yoichiro Tohi, Takuma Kato, Shinkuro Yamamoto, Hideo Fukuhara, Atsushi Takamoto, Ryutaro Shimizu, Shuichi Morizane, Yutaro Sasaki, Kei Daizumoto, Taichi Nagami, Koichiro Wada, Motoo Araki
{"title":"一线化疗周期的不足使得接受avelumab维持治疗的转移性尿路上皮癌患者的生存结果很差:来自日本泌尿外科协会的研究结果。","authors":"Satoshi Katayama, Takehiro Iwata, Shingo Nishimura, Kensuke Bekku, Keita Kobayashi, Nakanori Fujii, Kenichi Nishimura, Noriyoshi Miura, Yoichiro Tohi, Takuma Kato, Shinkuro Yamamoto, Hideo Fukuhara, Atsushi Takamoto, Ryutaro Shimizu, Shuichi Morizane, Yutaro Sasaki, Kei Daizumoto, Taichi Nagami, Koichiro Wada, Motoo Araki","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite 4-6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy being recommended before the initiation of avelumab maintenance treatment, a non-negligible number of patients received <4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy due to adverse events or pre-existing comorbidities. We assessed the prognostic impact of the number of first-line chemotherapy cycles in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with avelumab maintenance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-institutional study, data were collected from patients with mUC who received avelumab maintenance treatment following first-line chemotherapy. Patients were divided into those who received <4 cycles versus ≥4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the association of chemotherapy cycle numbers with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 patients included in this analysis, 17 (19%) underwent <4 cycles of chemotherapy. Patients with <4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were less likely to receive carboplatin-containing chemotherapy compared with their counterparts (6% versus 39%). On multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusted for the effects of confounding factors, receiving <4 cycles of chemotherapy was significantly associated with worse OS and CSS (HR 2.85; P = .006 and HR 3.18; P = .005, respectively), which was confirmed by subgroup analysis focusing on patients with 1-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy use was associated with better OS over carboplatin-based chemotherapy (HR 0.41; P = .033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An inadequate number of first-line chemotherapy cycles was associated with poor survival outcomes. Four or more cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy may be beneficial to ensure the efficacy of avelumab maintenance treatment in patients with mUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An inadequate number of first-line chemotherapy cycles provides poor survival outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving avelumab maintenance: results from the chu-shikoku Japan urological consortium.\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Katayama, Takehiro Iwata, Shingo Nishimura, Kensuke Bekku, Keita Kobayashi, Nakanori Fujii, Kenichi Nishimura, Noriyoshi Miura, Yoichiro Tohi, Takuma Kato, Shinkuro Yamamoto, Hideo Fukuhara, Atsushi Takamoto, Ryutaro Shimizu, Shuichi Morizane, Yutaro Sasaki, Kei Daizumoto, Taichi Nagami, Koichiro Wada, Motoo Araki\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jjco/hyaf163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite 4-6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy being recommended before the initiation of avelumab maintenance treatment, a non-negligible number of patients received <4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy due to adverse events or pre-existing comorbidities. We assessed the prognostic impact of the number of first-line chemotherapy cycles in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with avelumab maintenance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-institutional study, data were collected from patients with mUC who received avelumab maintenance treatment following first-line chemotherapy. Patients were divided into those who received <4 cycles versus ≥4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the association of chemotherapy cycle numbers with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 patients included in this analysis, 17 (19%) underwent <4 cycles of chemotherapy. Patients with <4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were less likely to receive carboplatin-containing chemotherapy compared with their counterparts (6% versus 39%). On multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusted for the effects of confounding factors, receiving <4 cycles of chemotherapy was significantly associated with worse OS and CSS (HR 2.85; P = .006 and HR 3.18; P = .005, respectively), which was confirmed by subgroup analysis focusing on patients with 1-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy use was associated with better OS over carboplatin-based chemotherapy (HR 0.41; P = .033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An inadequate number of first-line chemotherapy cycles was associated with poor survival outcomes. Four or more cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy may be beneficial to ensure the efficacy of avelumab maintenance treatment in patients with mUC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管在开始avelumab维持治疗前推荐4-6个周期的一线化疗,但仍有不可忽略的患者接受了方法:在这项多机构研究中,收集了一线化疗后接受avelumab维持治疗的mUC患者的数据。结果:在本分析的91例患者中,17例(19%)接受了化疗。结论:一线化疗周期不足与不良的生存结果相关。4个或更多周期的一线铂基化疗可能有利于确保mUC患者的avelumab维持治疗的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An inadequate number of first-line chemotherapy cycles provides poor survival outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving avelumab maintenance: results from the chu-shikoku Japan urological consortium.

Purpose: Despite 4-6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy being recommended before the initiation of avelumab maintenance treatment, a non-negligible number of patients received <4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy due to adverse events or pre-existing comorbidities. We assessed the prognostic impact of the number of first-line chemotherapy cycles in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with avelumab maintenance.

Methods: In this multi-institutional study, data were collected from patients with mUC who received avelumab maintenance treatment following first-line chemotherapy. Patients were divided into those who received <4 cycles versus ≥4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the association of chemotherapy cycle numbers with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results: Of 91 patients included in this analysis, 17 (19%) underwent <4 cycles of chemotherapy. Patients with <4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were less likely to receive carboplatin-containing chemotherapy compared with their counterparts (6% versus 39%). On multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusted for the effects of confounding factors, receiving <4 cycles of chemotherapy was significantly associated with worse OS and CSS (HR 2.85; P = .006 and HR 3.18; P = .005, respectively), which was confirmed by subgroup analysis focusing on patients with 1-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy use was associated with better OS over carboplatin-based chemotherapy (HR 0.41; P = .033).

Conclusions: An inadequate number of first-line chemotherapy cycles was associated with poor survival outcomes. Four or more cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy may be beneficial to ensure the efficacy of avelumab maintenance treatment in patients with mUC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信