Chun-Wei Li, Qi Li, Yu Liu, Yu Zhang, Zhong-Kui Wang, Yu Xing, Yi-Shan Niu, Yi Pang, Kang Yu
{"title":"肌肉减少型肥胖通过增加肌间和内脏脂肪堆积加重胃癌预后。","authors":"Chun-Wei Li, Qi Li, Yu Liu, Yu Zhang, Zhong-Kui Wang, Yu Xing, Yi-Shan Niu, Yi Pang, Kang Yu","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-03251-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ectopic fat distribution reflects patient's metabolic profile, shaping the tumor microenvironment, which may be a key prognostic indicator. Our study pursues to explore the independent and combined effects of muscle atrophy and abnormal fat distribution on survival in gastric cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed body composition in 283 gastric cancer patients from Center Hospital, Tianjin University (June 2016-May 2025) using pretreatment CT at L<sub>3</sub>, assessing muscle mass, intermuscular, and visceral fat. Ectopic fat phenotypes included visceral obesity (increased visceral adipose tissue, VAT) and myosteatosis (reduced skeletal muscle density, SMD). Associations between body composition parameters/phenotypes and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cachexia-related survival (CRS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 283 patients, 32 patients (11.3%) were BMI-define obese, 139 patients (49.1%) showed visceral obesity, and 176 patients (62.2%) presented with myosteatosis. Sarcopenia was present in 234 patients (82.7%), and 151 patients (53.4%) presented with a combination of sarcopenia and myosteatosis. During a median follow-up of 41 months (2-108 months), 53 patients developed metastasis, 6 relapse, and 142 died. Skeletal muscle mass (Normal Attenuation Muscle Area, NAMA, HR = 0.989, 95% CI 0.980-0.998, P = 0.022, for PFS) and quality (SMD, HR = 0.975, 95% CI 0.955-0.995, P = 0.013, for PFS) serve as protective prognostic factors after multiple covariate adjustments. Multivariate analyses identified all adiposity-related parameters, including Low Attenuation Muscle Area (LAMA, HR = 1.015, 95% CI 1.003-1.026, P = 0.012, for PFS), intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT, HR = 1.018, 95% CI 1.002-1.034, P = 0.027, for PFS), and VFI (HR = 1.008, 95% CI 1.001-1.015, P = 0.042) as negative indicators for survival. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these associations. Besides, IMAT, LAMA, and VFI significantly influence prognosis in advanced patients (TNM stage III-IV). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed sarcopenic visceral obesity markedly reduces survival; when combined with myosteatosis (SMVO), this combined phenotype further exacerbated CRS (5-year CRS: 74.7% in SMVO, P = 0.019) beyond the effects of individual phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sarcopenic obesity (myosteatosis/visceral obesity) can identify poorer prognosis in gastric cancer patients, especially male patients. It is crucial for obese gastric cancer patients to evaluate their body composition, specifically focusing on fat distribution.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered in August 2016, NCT02873676 at www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov .</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"1012"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sarcopenic obesity exacerbates gastric cancer prognosis via increased intermuscular and visceral fat accumulation.\",\"authors\":\"Chun-Wei Li, Qi Li, Yu Liu, Yu Zhang, Zhong-Kui Wang, Yu Xing, Yi-Shan Niu, Yi Pang, Kang Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40001-025-03251-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ectopic fat distribution reflects patient's metabolic profile, shaping the tumor microenvironment, which may be a key prognostic indicator. Our study pursues to explore the independent and combined effects of muscle atrophy and abnormal fat distribution on survival in gastric cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed body composition in 283 gastric cancer patients from Center Hospital, Tianjin University (June 2016-May 2025) using pretreatment CT at L<sub>3</sub>, assessing muscle mass, intermuscular, and visceral fat. Ectopic fat phenotypes included visceral obesity (increased visceral adipose tissue, VAT) and myosteatosis (reduced skeletal muscle density, SMD). Associations between body composition parameters/phenotypes and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cachexia-related survival (CRS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 283 patients, 32 patients (11.3%) were BMI-define obese, 139 patients (49.1%) showed visceral obesity, and 176 patients (62.2%) presented with myosteatosis. Sarcopenia was present in 234 patients (82.7%), and 151 patients (53.4%) presented with a combination of sarcopenia and myosteatosis. During a median follow-up of 41 months (2-108 months), 53 patients developed metastasis, 6 relapse, and 142 died. Skeletal muscle mass (Normal Attenuation Muscle Area, NAMA, HR = 0.989, 95% CI 0.980-0.998, P = 0.022, for PFS) and quality (SMD, HR = 0.975, 95% CI 0.955-0.995, P = 0.013, for PFS) serve as protective prognostic factors after multiple covariate adjustments. Multivariate analyses identified all adiposity-related parameters, including Low Attenuation Muscle Area (LAMA, HR = 1.015, 95% CI 1.003-1.026, P = 0.012, for PFS), intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT, HR = 1.018, 95% CI 1.002-1.034, P = 0.027, for PFS), and VFI (HR = 1.008, 95% CI 1.001-1.015, P = 0.042) as negative indicators for survival. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these associations. Besides, IMAT, LAMA, and VFI significantly influence prognosis in advanced patients (TNM stage III-IV). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed sarcopenic visceral obesity markedly reduces survival; when combined with myosteatosis (SMVO), this combined phenotype further exacerbated CRS (5-year CRS: 74.7% in SMVO, P = 0.019) beyond the effects of individual phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sarcopenic obesity (myosteatosis/visceral obesity) can identify poorer prognosis in gastric cancer patients, especially male patients. It is crucial for obese gastric cancer patients to evaluate their body composition, specifically focusing on fat distribution.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered in August 2016, NCT02873676 at www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"1012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03251-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03251-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:异位脂肪分布反映了患者的代谢特征,塑造了肿瘤微环境,可能是一个关键的预后指标。我们的研究旨在探讨肌肉萎缩和脂肪分布异常对胃癌患者生存的独立和联合影响。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了天津大学中心医院(2016年6月- 2025年5月)283例胃癌患者的体成分,采用L3层预处理CT,评估肌肉质量、肌间质和内脏脂肪。异位脂肪表型包括内脏肥胖(内脏脂肪组织增加,VAT)和骨骼肌病(骨骼肌密度降低,SMD)。采用Kaplan-Meier分析、log-rank检验和Cox比例风险回归评估体成分参数/表型与无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和恶病质相关生存期(CRS)之间的关系。结果:283例患者中,bmi定义肥胖32例(11.3%),内脏型肥胖139例(49.1%),肌骨化症176例(62.2%)。234例(82.7%)患者出现肌肉减少症,151例(53.4%)患者同时出现肌肉减少症和肌骨化症。在中位随访41个月(2-108个月)期间,53例患者发生转移,6例复发,142例死亡。经多重协变量调整后,骨骼肌质量(正常衰减肌面积,NAMA, HR = 0.989, 95% CI 0.980-0.998, P = 0.022, PFS)和质量(SMD, HR = 0.975, 95% CI 0.955-0.995, P = 0.013, PFS)是保护预后的因素。多变量分析确定了所有与肥胖相关的参数,包括低衰减肌面积(LAMA, HR = 1.015, 95% CI 1.003-1.026, P = 0.012,对于PFS)、肌间脂肪组织(IMAT, HR = 1.018, 95% CI 1.002-1.034, P = 0.027,对于PFS)和VFI (HR = 1.008, 95% CI 1.001-1.015, P = 0.042)是生存的负面指标。敏感性分析证实了这些关联。IMAT、LAMA、VFI对晚期患者(TNM III-IV期)预后有显著影响。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示肌肉减少性内脏肥胖显著降低生存率;当与肌骨增生症(SMVO)合并时,这种联合表型进一步加重了CRS (SMVO的5年CRS: 74.7%, P = 0.019),超出了个体表型的影响。结论:肌少性肥胖(骨骼肌病/内脏型肥胖)可识别胃癌患者,尤其是男性患者预后较差。对于肥胖胃癌患者而言,评估其身体组成,特别是关注脂肪分布是至关重要的。试验报名:2016年8月注册,NCT02873676: www.Clinicaltrials: gov。
Sarcopenic obesity exacerbates gastric cancer prognosis via increased intermuscular and visceral fat accumulation.
Background: Ectopic fat distribution reflects patient's metabolic profile, shaping the tumor microenvironment, which may be a key prognostic indicator. Our study pursues to explore the independent and combined effects of muscle atrophy and abnormal fat distribution on survival in gastric cancer patients.
Method: This retrospective cohort study analyzed body composition in 283 gastric cancer patients from Center Hospital, Tianjin University (June 2016-May 2025) using pretreatment CT at L3, assessing muscle mass, intermuscular, and visceral fat. Ectopic fat phenotypes included visceral obesity (increased visceral adipose tissue, VAT) and myosteatosis (reduced skeletal muscle density, SMD). Associations between body composition parameters/phenotypes and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cachexia-related survival (CRS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results: Of the 283 patients, 32 patients (11.3%) were BMI-define obese, 139 patients (49.1%) showed visceral obesity, and 176 patients (62.2%) presented with myosteatosis. Sarcopenia was present in 234 patients (82.7%), and 151 patients (53.4%) presented with a combination of sarcopenia and myosteatosis. During a median follow-up of 41 months (2-108 months), 53 patients developed metastasis, 6 relapse, and 142 died. Skeletal muscle mass (Normal Attenuation Muscle Area, NAMA, HR = 0.989, 95% CI 0.980-0.998, P = 0.022, for PFS) and quality (SMD, HR = 0.975, 95% CI 0.955-0.995, P = 0.013, for PFS) serve as protective prognostic factors after multiple covariate adjustments. Multivariate analyses identified all adiposity-related parameters, including Low Attenuation Muscle Area (LAMA, HR = 1.015, 95% CI 1.003-1.026, P = 0.012, for PFS), intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT, HR = 1.018, 95% CI 1.002-1.034, P = 0.027, for PFS), and VFI (HR = 1.008, 95% CI 1.001-1.015, P = 0.042) as negative indicators for survival. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these associations. Besides, IMAT, LAMA, and VFI significantly influence prognosis in advanced patients (TNM stage III-IV). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed sarcopenic visceral obesity markedly reduces survival; when combined with myosteatosis (SMVO), this combined phenotype further exacerbated CRS (5-year CRS: 74.7% in SMVO, P = 0.019) beyond the effects of individual phenotypes.
Conclusion: Sarcopenic obesity (myosteatosis/visceral obesity) can identify poorer prognosis in gastric cancer patients, especially male patients. It is crucial for obese gastric cancer patients to evaluate their body composition, specifically focusing on fat distribution.
Trial registration: Registered in August 2016, NCT02873676 at www.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.