{"title":"未进行常规分子检测的甲状腺细针穿刺非典型性两级亚分类的表现。","authors":"Pocholo D Santos, Chiung-Ru Lai, Jen-Fan Hang","doi":"10.1002/dc.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The third edition of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology recommends a simplified two-tiered subclassification of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), dividing cases into AUS with nuclear atypia (AUS-Nuclear) and other atypia (AUS-Other). This study aims to evaluate the performance of these subcategories in estimating the risk of malignancy (ROM) in a setting without routine molecular testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases diagnosed as AUS between 2018 and 2023. Surgical pathology reports were matched with the FNA-targeted nodules to enable cyto-histologic correlation. ROM and risk of neoplasm (RON) were calculated for all AUS cases and for each subcategory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16,030 thyroid FNA cases, 617 (3.8%) were diagnosed as AUS. Histologic follow-up was available in 190 cases. Final diagnoses included non-neoplastic lesions (42.6%), benign neoplasms (17.4%), low-risk neoplasms (5.3%), and malignant neoplasms (34.7%). The ROM for AUS-Nuclear was significantly higher at 54.7%, compared to 14.7% for AUS-Other (p < 0.001). Similarly, the RON was significantly higher in the AUS-Nuclear group (67.4%) than in the AUS-Other group (47.4%) (p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AUS-Nuclear carries a substantially higher ROM than AUS-Other, with a ROM (54.7%) comparable to the reported positive predictive values of molecular assays such as Afirma GSC (47%, 95% CI: 36%-58%) and ThyroSeq v3 (66%, 95% CI: 56%-75%). These findings support the clinical utility of the two-tiered AUS subclassification in enhancing risk stratification, particularly in settings where molecular testing is not routinely available.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Two-Tiered Subclassification of Atypia of Undetermined Significance in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Without Routine Molecular Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Pocholo D Santos, Chiung-Ru Lai, Jen-Fan Hang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dc.70034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The third edition of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology recommends a simplified two-tiered subclassification of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), dividing cases into AUS with nuclear atypia (AUS-Nuclear) and other atypia (AUS-Other). This study aims to evaluate the performance of these subcategories in estimating the risk of malignancy (ROM) in a setting without routine molecular testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases diagnosed as AUS between 2018 and 2023. Surgical pathology reports were matched with the FNA-targeted nodules to enable cyto-histologic correlation. ROM and risk of neoplasm (RON) were calculated for all AUS cases and for each subcategory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16,030 thyroid FNA cases, 617 (3.8%) were diagnosed as AUS. Histologic follow-up was available in 190 cases. Final diagnoses included non-neoplastic lesions (42.6%), benign neoplasms (17.4%), low-risk neoplasms (5.3%), and malignant neoplasms (34.7%). The ROM for AUS-Nuclear was significantly higher at 54.7%, compared to 14.7% for AUS-Other (p < 0.001). Similarly, the RON was significantly higher in the AUS-Nuclear group (67.4%) than in the AUS-Other group (47.4%) (p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AUS-Nuclear carries a substantially higher ROM than AUS-Other, with a ROM (54.7%) comparable to the reported positive predictive values of molecular assays such as Afirma GSC (47%, 95% CI: 36%-58%) and ThyroSeq v3 (66%, 95% CI: 56%-75%). These findings support the clinical utility of the two-tiered AUS subclassification in enhancing risk stratification, particularly in settings where molecular testing is not routinely available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance of Two-Tiered Subclassification of Atypia of Undetermined Significance in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Without Routine Molecular Testing.
Background: The third edition of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology recommends a simplified two-tiered subclassification of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), dividing cases into AUS with nuclear atypia (AUS-Nuclear) and other atypia (AUS-Other). This study aims to evaluate the performance of these subcategories in estimating the risk of malignancy (ROM) in a setting without routine molecular testing.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases diagnosed as AUS between 2018 and 2023. Surgical pathology reports were matched with the FNA-targeted nodules to enable cyto-histologic correlation. ROM and risk of neoplasm (RON) were calculated for all AUS cases and for each subcategory.
Results: Among 16,030 thyroid FNA cases, 617 (3.8%) were diagnosed as AUS. Histologic follow-up was available in 190 cases. Final diagnoses included non-neoplastic lesions (42.6%), benign neoplasms (17.4%), low-risk neoplasms (5.3%), and malignant neoplasms (34.7%). The ROM for AUS-Nuclear was significantly higher at 54.7%, compared to 14.7% for AUS-Other (p < 0.001). Similarly, the RON was significantly higher in the AUS-Nuclear group (67.4%) than in the AUS-Other group (47.4%) (p = 0.005).
Conclusion: AUS-Nuclear carries a substantially higher ROM than AUS-Other, with a ROM (54.7%) comparable to the reported positive predictive values of molecular assays such as Afirma GSC (47%, 95% CI: 36%-58%) and ThyroSeq v3 (66%, 95% CI: 56%-75%). These findings support the clinical utility of the two-tiered AUS subclassification in enhancing risk stratification, particularly in settings where molecular testing is not routinely available.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.