生命伦理与人文课程对肾内科住院医师教育培训的影响。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfaf298
Guillermo Cantú Quintanilla, Irma Gómez Guerrero, Gloria Garcia-Villalobos, Geovana Martin Alemañy, Nuria Aguiñaga Chiñas, Rafael Valdez-Ortiz
{"title":"生命伦理与人文课程对肾内科住院医师教育培训的影响。","authors":"Guillermo Cantú Quintanilla, Irma Gómez Guerrero, Gloria Garcia-Villalobos, Geovana Martin Alemañy, Nuria Aguiñaga Chiñas, Rafael Valdez-Ortiz","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfaf298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modern medical training must integrate not only clinical skills but also ethical and humanistic competencies. In 2013, a structured program in bioethics and humanism was implemented as part of a nephrology residency curriculum. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a 3-year humanism and bioethics program for nephrology residents that focused on improving clinical communication, reducing complaint and lawsuit numbers, increasing patient satisfaction, and supporting decision-making centered on quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal, ambispective cohort (2010-19), our 3-year curriculum delivered weekly 1-h sessions for 6 months/year to 45 residents and was facilitated by three faculty instructors across six core themes. To relate outcomes to the intervention, analyses were anchored to the 2013 launch and compared pre-program (2010-13) versus post-program (2014-19) rates of formal complaints, legal claims, patient satisfaction and maximum benefit discharges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Formal complaints decreased from 47.8 to 26.0 per year [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.67; <i>P</i> < .001; Holm <0.001]. Legal claims were reduced from 4.25 to 0.17 per year (IRR 0.039, 95% CI 0.005-0.295; <i>P</i> = .0016; Holm = 0.0016). Maximum benefit discharges increased from 4.25 to 76.5 per year (IRR 18.0, 95% CI 11.09-29.21; <i>P</i> < .001; Holm <0.001). For satisfaction, the ordinal logistic model showed an odds ratio (OR) of 3.53 (95% CI 1.96-6.38; <i>P</i> < .001; Holm = 0.0001), consistent with the dichotomous sensitivity analysis (≥4 vs ≤3) (OR 4.08, 95% CI 2.16-7.71; <i>P</i> < .000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The humanism and bioethics program was proven to be an effective and transformative educational tool that promoted ethical, empathetic and patient-centered nephrology practices. The positive impact of this program was evident in both clinical indicators and strengthened medical professionalism.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"18 10","pages":"sfaf298"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12538288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a bioethics and humanities program on the educational training of nephrology residents.\",\"authors\":\"Guillermo Cantú Quintanilla, Irma Gómez Guerrero, Gloria Garcia-Villalobos, Geovana Martin Alemañy, Nuria Aguiñaga Chiñas, Rafael Valdez-Ortiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ckj/sfaf298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modern medical training must integrate not only clinical skills but also ethical and humanistic competencies. In 2013, a structured program in bioethics and humanism was implemented as part of a nephrology residency curriculum. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a 3-year humanism and bioethics program for nephrology residents that focused on improving clinical communication, reducing complaint and lawsuit numbers, increasing patient satisfaction, and supporting decision-making centered on quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal, ambispective cohort (2010-19), our 3-year curriculum delivered weekly 1-h sessions for 6 months/year to 45 residents and was facilitated by three faculty instructors across six core themes. To relate outcomes to the intervention, analyses were anchored to the 2013 launch and compared pre-program (2010-13) versus post-program (2014-19) rates of formal complaints, legal claims, patient satisfaction and maximum benefit discharges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Formal complaints decreased from 47.8 to 26.0 per year [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.67; <i>P</i> < .001; Holm <0.001]. Legal claims were reduced from 4.25 to 0.17 per year (IRR 0.039, 95% CI 0.005-0.295; <i>P</i> = .0016; Holm = 0.0016). Maximum benefit discharges increased from 4.25 to 76.5 per year (IRR 18.0, 95% CI 11.09-29.21; <i>P</i> < .001; Holm <0.001). For satisfaction, the ordinal logistic model showed an odds ratio (OR) of 3.53 (95% CI 1.96-6.38; <i>P</i> < .001; Holm = 0.0001), consistent with the dichotomous sensitivity analysis (≥4 vs ≤3) (OR 4.08, 95% CI 2.16-7.71; <i>P</i> < .000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The humanism and bioethics program was proven to be an effective and transformative educational tool that promoted ethical, empathetic and patient-centered nephrology practices. The positive impact of this program was evident in both clinical indicators and strengthened medical professionalism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"sfaf298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12538288/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf298\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf298","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现代医学培训不仅要整合临床技能,还要整合伦理和人文能力。2013年,作为肾内科住院医师课程的一部分,实施了生物伦理学和人文主义的结构化课程。本研究的目的是评估为期3年的人文主义和生物伦理计划对肾病住院医师的影响,该计划侧重于改善临床沟通,减少投诉和诉讼数量,提高患者满意度,并支持以生活质量为中心的决策。方法:纵向、双视角队列(2010-19),我们的3年课程每周向45名住院医师提供1小时的课程,为期6个月/年,由3名教师指导,涉及6个核心主题。为了将结果与干预联系起来,分析以2013年启动为基础,并比较了项目前(2010-13年)与项目后(2014-19年)的正式投诉、法律索赔、患者满意度和最大受益出院率。结果:正式投诉从每年47.8起下降到26.0起[发病率比(IRR) 0.54, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.44-0.67;P = .0016;Holm = 0.0016)。最大受益出院率从每年4.25例增加到76.5例(IRR 18.0, 95% CI 11.09-29.21) P P P结论:人文主义和生物伦理学项目被证明是一种有效的、变革性的教育工具,促进了伦理、共情和以患者为中心的肾脏病实践。该方案的积极影响在临床指标和增强的医疗专业水平上都很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of a bioethics and humanities program on the educational training of nephrology residents.

Impact of a bioethics and humanities program on the educational training of nephrology residents.

Impact of a bioethics and humanities program on the educational training of nephrology residents.

Impact of a bioethics and humanities program on the educational training of nephrology residents.

Background: Modern medical training must integrate not only clinical skills but also ethical and humanistic competencies. In 2013, a structured program in bioethics and humanism was implemented as part of a nephrology residency curriculum. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a 3-year humanism and bioethics program for nephrology residents that focused on improving clinical communication, reducing complaint and lawsuit numbers, increasing patient satisfaction, and supporting decision-making centered on quality of life.

Methods: A longitudinal, ambispective cohort (2010-19), our 3-year curriculum delivered weekly 1-h sessions for 6 months/year to 45 residents and was facilitated by three faculty instructors across six core themes. To relate outcomes to the intervention, analyses were anchored to the 2013 launch and compared pre-program (2010-13) versus post-program (2014-19) rates of formal complaints, legal claims, patient satisfaction and maximum benefit discharges.

Results: Formal complaints decreased from 47.8 to 26.0 per year [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.67; P < .001; Holm <0.001]. Legal claims were reduced from 4.25 to 0.17 per year (IRR 0.039, 95% CI 0.005-0.295; P = .0016; Holm = 0.0016). Maximum benefit discharges increased from 4.25 to 76.5 per year (IRR 18.0, 95% CI 11.09-29.21; P < .001; Holm <0.001). For satisfaction, the ordinal logistic model showed an odds ratio (OR) of 3.53 (95% CI 1.96-6.38; P < .001; Holm = 0.0001), consistent with the dichotomous sensitivity analysis (≥4 vs ≤3) (OR 4.08, 95% CI 2.16-7.71; P < .000).

Conclusions: The humanism and bioethics program was proven to be an effective and transformative educational tool that promoted ethical, empathetic and patient-centered nephrology practices. The positive impact of this program was evident in both clinical indicators and strengthened medical professionalism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信