第3部分:伦理:2025年美国心脏协会心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理指南。

IF 38.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation Pub Date : 2025-10-21 Epub Date: 2025-10-22 DOI:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001371
Jonathan Elmer, Dianne L Atkins, Mohamud R Daya, Marina Del Rios, Jessica T Fry, Carrie M Henderson, Mithya Lewis-Newby, Vanessa N Madrigal, Catherine A Marco, Joseph P Ornato, Erin T Paquette, Sam Parnia, Amber J Rodriguez, Joseph P Shapiro, Stephen M Schexnayder, Elliott M Weiss, David M Zientek, Ahamed H Idris
{"title":"第3部分:伦理:2025年美国心脏协会心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理指南。","authors":"Jonathan Elmer, Dianne L Atkins, Mohamud R Daya, Marina Del Rios, Jessica T Fry, Carrie M Henderson, Mithya Lewis-Newby, Vanessa N Madrigal, Catherine A Marco, Joseph P Ornato, Erin T Paquette, Sam Parnia, Amber J Rodriguez, Joseph P Shapiro, Stephen M Schexnayder, Elliott M Weiss, David M Zientek, Ahamed H Idris","doi":"10.1161/CIR.0000000000001371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this chapter, the American Heart Association provides guidance on ethical considerations relevant to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. An overview is provided of ethical frameworks that provide a structure through which difficult decisions can be analyzed. These include principlism, currently the predominant medical ethical framework, which considers moral principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. Additional consideration is given to the value of dignity, and other ethical frameworks such as narrative ethics, crisis standards of care, utilitarianism, virtue ethics, and deontology. The importance of equity and the imperative for health care professionals and their organizations to actively address structural inequities, social determinants of health and resulting disparities related to Emergency Cardiovascular Care is highlighted. Processes for decision-making are discussed, including guidance on advance directives and shared decision-making. Decisions to initiate or withhold and subsequently to continue or terminate resuscitation are reviewed at length. In addition to considering this decision in adults and geriatric patients, specific attention is given to decision-making in children, newborn infants, and pregnant patients. The impact of prognostic uncertainty on these decisions is discussed, as well as the evaluation of potentially ineffective therapies and cultural and religious considerations. Other ethical topics are addressed briefly, including processes for research and knowledge generation; the impact of resuscitation on health care professionals, survivors, laypersons, families, and caregivers; family presence during resuscitation; crisis standards of care; advanced therapies, including extracorporeal support; and organ and tissue donation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10331,"journal":{"name":"Circulation","volume":"152 16_suppl_2","pages":"S323-S352"},"PeriodicalIF":38.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Part 3: Ethics: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Elmer, Dianne L Atkins, Mohamud R Daya, Marina Del Rios, Jessica T Fry, Carrie M Henderson, Mithya Lewis-Newby, Vanessa N Madrigal, Catherine A Marco, Joseph P Ornato, Erin T Paquette, Sam Parnia, Amber J Rodriguez, Joseph P Shapiro, Stephen M Schexnayder, Elliott M Weiss, David M Zientek, Ahamed H Idris\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIR.0000000000001371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this chapter, the American Heart Association provides guidance on ethical considerations relevant to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. An overview is provided of ethical frameworks that provide a structure through which difficult decisions can be analyzed. These include principlism, currently the predominant medical ethical framework, which considers moral principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. Additional consideration is given to the value of dignity, and other ethical frameworks such as narrative ethics, crisis standards of care, utilitarianism, virtue ethics, and deontology. The importance of equity and the imperative for health care professionals and their organizations to actively address structural inequities, social determinants of health and resulting disparities related to Emergency Cardiovascular Care is highlighted. Processes for decision-making are discussed, including guidance on advance directives and shared decision-making. Decisions to initiate or withhold and subsequently to continue or terminate resuscitation are reviewed at length. In addition to considering this decision in adults and geriatric patients, specific attention is given to decision-making in children, newborn infants, and pregnant patients. The impact of prognostic uncertainty on these decisions is discussed, as well as the evaluation of potentially ineffective therapies and cultural and religious considerations. Other ethical topics are addressed briefly, including processes for research and knowledge generation; the impact of resuscitation on health care professionals, survivors, laypersons, families, and caregivers; family presence during resuscitation; crisis standards of care; advanced therapies, including extracorporeal support; and organ and tissue donation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation\",\"volume\":\"152 16_suppl_2\",\"pages\":\"S323-S352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":38.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001371\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001371","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本章中,美国心脏协会提供了与心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理相关的伦理考虑的指导。概述了道德框架,这些框架提供了一个结构,通过该结构可以分析困难的决策。这些包括原则,目前占主导地位的医学伦理框架,它考虑了善行、无害、尊重自主和正义的道德原则。另外还考虑到尊严的价值,以及其他伦理框架,如叙事伦理、危机关怀标准、功利主义、美德伦理和义务论。强调了公平的重要性以及保健专业人员及其组织必须积极解决结构性不平等、健康的社会决定因素以及由此产生的与心血管紧急护理有关的差异。讨论了决策过程,包括预先指示和共同决策的指导。决定启动或停止,随后继续或终止复苏进行了详细审查。除了考虑成人和老年患者的决策外,还特别关注儿童、新生儿和孕妇患者的决策。讨论了预后不确定性对这些决定的影响,以及对可能无效的治疗方法和文化和宗教因素的评估。其他伦理问题简要地讨论,包括研究和知识产生的过程;复苏对卫生保健专业人员、幸存者、外行、家属和护理人员的影响;复苏时家人在场;危机护理标准;先进疗法,包括体外支持;器官和组织捐赠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Part 3: Ethics: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

In this chapter, the American Heart Association provides guidance on ethical considerations relevant to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. An overview is provided of ethical frameworks that provide a structure through which difficult decisions can be analyzed. These include principlism, currently the predominant medical ethical framework, which considers moral principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. Additional consideration is given to the value of dignity, and other ethical frameworks such as narrative ethics, crisis standards of care, utilitarianism, virtue ethics, and deontology. The importance of equity and the imperative for health care professionals and their organizations to actively address structural inequities, social determinants of health and resulting disparities related to Emergency Cardiovascular Care is highlighted. Processes for decision-making are discussed, including guidance on advance directives and shared decision-making. Decisions to initiate or withhold and subsequently to continue or terminate resuscitation are reviewed at length. In addition to considering this decision in adults and geriatric patients, specific attention is given to decision-making in children, newborn infants, and pregnant patients. The impact of prognostic uncertainty on these decisions is discussed, as well as the evaluation of potentially ineffective therapies and cultural and religious considerations. Other ethical topics are addressed briefly, including processes for research and knowledge generation; the impact of resuscitation on health care professionals, survivors, laypersons, families, and caregivers; family presence during resuscitation; crisis standards of care; advanced therapies, including extracorporeal support; and organ and tissue donation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation
Circulation 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
45.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
1473
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Circulation is a platform that publishes a diverse range of content related to cardiovascular health and disease. This includes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other contributions spanning observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services, outcomes studies, and advancements in basic and translational research. The journal serves as a vital resource for professionals and researchers in the field of cardiovascular health, providing a comprehensive platform for disseminating knowledge and fostering advancements in the understanding and management of cardiovascular issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信