在重度抑郁障碍的抗抑郁治疗过程中探索风险决策动力学:一种计算建模方法。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Weiting Zhou, Zhaoyu Zuo, Xinlei Ji, Qinyu Liu, Fan Xiao, Shulin Fang, Penghui Guo, Qiang Luo, Xiang Wang
{"title":"在重度抑郁障碍的抗抑郁治疗过程中探索风险决策动力学:一种计算建模方法。","authors":"Weiting Zhou, Zhaoyu Zuo, Xinlei Ji, Qinyu Liu, Fan Xiao, Shulin Fang, Penghui Guo, Qiang Luo, Xiang Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-07412-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) show greater loss sensitivity and higher delayed discounting rates during decision making, but findings regarding their risk preferences are inconsistent. Computational behavioral modeling provides a promising tool for the investigation of these latent factors underlying the decision-making behaviors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Conduct both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to identify patterns and changes in risky decision-making over time, examine correlations between traditional CGT performance indicators and cognitive modeling parameters to better understand the underlying mechanisms of decision-making, and separately explore participants' reward and loss sensitivities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At baseline, 52 patients with MDD and 66 healthy controls (HCs) underwent psychometric assessment and performed the Cambridge gambling task (CGT) characterizing risky decision-making behavior. After 8 weeks of treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, the patient group underwent assessment and performed the CGT again. Applying a cumulative model to the trial-by-trial behavioral data of the CGT, we also compared the latent factors between groups, including probability distortion, color bias, utility/loss sensitivity, delayed reward discounting and choice consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with MDD had more depressive symptoms and anhedonia than did HCs. MDD group exhibited both greater delayed reward discounting and lower choice consistency than HCs. After the treatment, MDD group had both decreased loss sensitivity and color choice bias. Controlling for depressive symptoms, a deficit in consummatory pleasure with motivational drive was associated with greater delayed reward discounting at baseline in MDD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that patients with MDD have deficits in reward function (higher delayed reward discounting and lower risk adjustment) at baseline. With antidepressant treatment, loss sensitivity decreased while impairment in reward function persists, and these patients tend to make more risky choices after treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The registration number is ChiCTR2000031931 and date of registration is April 15th 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"1016"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring risky decision-making dynamics during antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: a computational modeling approach.\",\"authors\":\"Weiting Zhou, Zhaoyu Zuo, Xinlei Ji, Qinyu Liu, Fan Xiao, Shulin Fang, Penghui Guo, Qiang Luo, Xiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12888-025-07412-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) show greater loss sensitivity and higher delayed discounting rates during decision making, but findings regarding their risk preferences are inconsistent. Computational behavioral modeling provides a promising tool for the investigation of these latent factors underlying the decision-making behaviors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Conduct both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to identify patterns and changes in risky decision-making over time, examine correlations between traditional CGT performance indicators and cognitive modeling parameters to better understand the underlying mechanisms of decision-making, and separately explore participants' reward and loss sensitivities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At baseline, 52 patients with MDD and 66 healthy controls (HCs) underwent psychometric assessment and performed the Cambridge gambling task (CGT) characterizing risky decision-making behavior. After 8 weeks of treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, the patient group underwent assessment and performed the CGT again. Applying a cumulative model to the trial-by-trial behavioral data of the CGT, we also compared the latent factors between groups, including probability distortion, color bias, utility/loss sensitivity, delayed reward discounting and choice consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with MDD had more depressive symptoms and anhedonia than did HCs. MDD group exhibited both greater delayed reward discounting and lower choice consistency than HCs. After the treatment, MDD group had both decreased loss sensitivity and color choice bias. Controlling for depressive symptoms, a deficit in consummatory pleasure with motivational drive was associated with greater delayed reward discounting at baseline in MDD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that patients with MDD have deficits in reward function (higher delayed reward discounting and lower risk adjustment) at baseline. With antidepressant treatment, loss sensitivity decreased while impairment in reward function persists, and these patients tend to make more risky choices after treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The registration number is ChiCTR2000031931 and date of registration is April 15th 2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07412-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07412-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者在决策过程中表现出更高的损失敏感性和更高的延迟折现率,但有关其风险偏好的研究结果并不一致。计算行为建模为研究决策行为背后的潜在因素提供了一种很有前途的工具。目的:通过横断面和纵向分析来识别风险决策的模式和随时间的变化,检验传统CGT绩效指标与认知建模参数之间的相关性,以更好地了解决策的潜在机制,并分别探讨参与者的奖励和损失敏感性。方法:在基线时,52例重度抑郁症患者和66例健康对照(hc)接受了心理测量评估,并执行了表征风险决策行为的剑桥赌博任务(CGT)。选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗8周后,患者组进行评估并再次进行CGT。运用累积模型对CGT的每次试验行为数据进行分析,比较了组间的潜在因素,包括概率失真、颜色偏差、效用/损失敏感性、延迟奖励折扣和选择一致性。结果:MDD患者比hc患者有更多的抑郁症状和快感缺乏症。重度抑郁症组表现出更大的延迟奖励折扣和更低的选择一致性。治疗后,重度抑郁症组的损失敏感性和颜色选择偏倚均有所降低。在控制抑郁症状的情况下,MDD组具有动机驱动的完满性愉悦缺失与基线时更大的延迟奖励折扣相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,重度抑郁症患者在基线时存在奖励功能缺陷(较高的延迟奖励折扣和较低的风险调整)。抗抑郁药物治疗后,丧失敏感性降低,而奖励功能损害持续存在,这些患者在治疗后往往会做出更冒险的选择。试验注册:注册号为ChiCTR2000031931,注册日期为2020年4月15日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring risky decision-making dynamics during antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: a computational modeling approach.

Background: Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) show greater loss sensitivity and higher delayed discounting rates during decision making, but findings regarding their risk preferences are inconsistent. Computational behavioral modeling provides a promising tool for the investigation of these latent factors underlying the decision-making behaviors.

Objectives: Conduct both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to identify patterns and changes in risky decision-making over time, examine correlations between traditional CGT performance indicators and cognitive modeling parameters to better understand the underlying mechanisms of decision-making, and separately explore participants' reward and loss sensitivities.

Methods: At baseline, 52 patients with MDD and 66 healthy controls (HCs) underwent psychometric assessment and performed the Cambridge gambling task (CGT) characterizing risky decision-making behavior. After 8 weeks of treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, the patient group underwent assessment and performed the CGT again. Applying a cumulative model to the trial-by-trial behavioral data of the CGT, we also compared the latent factors between groups, including probability distortion, color bias, utility/loss sensitivity, delayed reward discounting and choice consistency.

Results: Patients with MDD had more depressive symptoms and anhedonia than did HCs. MDD group exhibited both greater delayed reward discounting and lower choice consistency than HCs. After the treatment, MDD group had both decreased loss sensitivity and color choice bias. Controlling for depressive symptoms, a deficit in consummatory pleasure with motivational drive was associated with greater delayed reward discounting at baseline in MDD group.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients with MDD have deficits in reward function (higher delayed reward discounting and lower risk adjustment) at baseline. With antidepressant treatment, loss sensitivity decreased while impairment in reward function persists, and these patients tend to make more risky choices after treatment.

Trial registration: The registration number is ChiCTR2000031931 and date of registration is April 15th 2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信