韩国肺部多药/利福平耐药结核病患者分子药敏试验的全国覆盖:一项回顾性队列研究(2015-2021)

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jeongha Mok, Dawoon Jeong, Hojoon Sohn, Saerom Kim, Seung Won Lee, Young Ae Kang
{"title":"韩国肺部多药/利福平耐药结核病患者分子药敏试验的全国覆盖:一项回顾性队列研究(2015-2021)","authors":"Jeongha Mok, Dawoon Jeong, Hojoon Sohn, Saerom Kim, Seung Won Lee, Young Ae Kang","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed the coverage of molecular drug susceptibility testing (mDST) among patients with pulmonary multidrug/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) in South Korea and identified factors influencing the lack of mDST implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with pulmonary MDR/RR-TB who initiated tuberculosis (TB) treatment between January 2015 and September 2021. Data were obtained from the K-TB-N cohort, an integrated national TB database linking three datasets. We assessed mDST coverage, temporal trends and factors associated with the lack of mDST implementation. mDST was defined as the use of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay or line probe assay (LPA) for isoniazid and rifampicin (first-line LPA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4637 patients were included in the analysis. Of the 4637 patients, 1342 (28.9%) did not undergo mDST; whereas, 3295 (71.1%) underwent mDST. Over the study period, a statistically significant annual increase in mDST coverage was observed, escalating from 49.1% in 2015 to 96.9% in 2021 (p<0.001). Throughout the study, the coverage of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay remained lower than that of LPA (22.1% vs 64.2%, p<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified several factors independently associated with a decreased likelihood of mDST being conducted, including TB treatment initiation in secondary general hospitals, small hospitals or primary clinics, as well as in non-public-private mix (PPM) participating institutions. In addition, transfers between PPM-participating and non-participating institutions during the treatment period and sputum acid-fast bacilli smear-negative status were significantly associated with lower mDST uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the increasing mDST coverage is a positive development, further efforts are needed to achieve nationwide and universal implementation, particularly for the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, in South Korea.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationwide coverage of molecular drug susceptibility testing in patients with pulmonary multidrug/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in South Korea: a retrospective cohort study (2015-2021).\",\"authors\":\"Jeongha Mok, Dawoon Jeong, Hojoon Sohn, Saerom Kim, Seung Won Lee, Young Ae Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed the coverage of molecular drug susceptibility testing (mDST) among patients with pulmonary multidrug/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) in South Korea and identified factors influencing the lack of mDST implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with pulmonary MDR/RR-TB who initiated tuberculosis (TB) treatment between January 2015 and September 2021. Data were obtained from the K-TB-N cohort, an integrated national TB database linking three datasets. We assessed mDST coverage, temporal trends and factors associated with the lack of mDST implementation. mDST was defined as the use of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay or line probe assay (LPA) for isoniazid and rifampicin (first-line LPA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4637 patients were included in the analysis. Of the 4637 patients, 1342 (28.9%) did not undergo mDST; whereas, 3295 (71.1%) underwent mDST. Over the study period, a statistically significant annual increase in mDST coverage was observed, escalating from 49.1% in 2015 to 96.9% in 2021 (p<0.001). Throughout the study, the coverage of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay remained lower than that of LPA (22.1% vs 64.2%, p<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified several factors independently associated with a decreased likelihood of mDST being conducted, including TB treatment initiation in secondary general hospitals, small hospitals or primary clinics, as well as in non-public-private mix (PPM) participating institutions. In addition, transfers between PPM-participating and non-participating institutions during the treatment period and sputum acid-fast bacilli smear-negative status were significantly associated with lower mDST uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the increasing mDST coverage is a positive development, further efforts are needed to achieve nationwide and universal implementation, particularly for the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, in South Korea.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003307\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们评估了韩国肺部多药/利福平耐药结核病(MDR/ rp - tb)患者分子药敏试验(mDST)的覆盖率,并确定了影响mDST实施不足的因素。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了2015年1月至2021年9月期间开始结核病(TB)治疗的肺部MDR/RR-TB患者。数据来自K-TB-N队列,这是一个连接三个数据集的综合国家结核病数据库。我们评估了mDST覆盖率、时间趋势和与mDST实施缺乏相关的因素。mDST定义为使用Xpert MTB/RIF法或线探针法(LPA)检测异烟肼和利福平(一线LPA)。结果:共纳入4637例患者。在4637例患者中,1342例(28.9%)未接受mDST;3295例(71.1%)行mDST。在研究期间,观察到mDST覆盖率的统计显着年度增长,从2015年的49.1%上升到2021年的96.9% (p结论:尽管mDST覆盖率的增加是一个积极的发展,但需要进一步努力实现全国和普遍实施,特别是在韩国的Xpert MTB/RIF检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nationwide coverage of molecular drug susceptibility testing in patients with pulmonary multidrug/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in South Korea: a retrospective cohort study (2015-2021).

Background: We assessed the coverage of molecular drug susceptibility testing (mDST) among patients with pulmonary multidrug/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) in South Korea and identified factors influencing the lack of mDST implementation.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with pulmonary MDR/RR-TB who initiated tuberculosis (TB) treatment between January 2015 and September 2021. Data were obtained from the K-TB-N cohort, an integrated national TB database linking three datasets. We assessed mDST coverage, temporal trends and factors associated with the lack of mDST implementation. mDST was defined as the use of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay or line probe assay (LPA) for isoniazid and rifampicin (first-line LPA).

Results: In total, 4637 patients were included in the analysis. Of the 4637 patients, 1342 (28.9%) did not undergo mDST; whereas, 3295 (71.1%) underwent mDST. Over the study period, a statistically significant annual increase in mDST coverage was observed, escalating from 49.1% in 2015 to 96.9% in 2021 (p<0.001). Throughout the study, the coverage of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay remained lower than that of LPA (22.1% vs 64.2%, p<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified several factors independently associated with a decreased likelihood of mDST being conducted, including TB treatment initiation in secondary general hospitals, small hospitals or primary clinics, as well as in non-public-private mix (PPM) participating institutions. In addition, transfers between PPM-participating and non-participating institutions during the treatment period and sputum acid-fast bacilli smear-negative status were significantly associated with lower mDST uptake.

Conclusion: Although the increasing mDST coverage is a positive development, further efforts are needed to achieve nationwide and universal implementation, particularly for the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, in South Korea.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信