{"title":"中国骨髓增殖性肿瘤患者和血液科医生在治疗目标和疾病管理方面的差异:来自多中心横断面调查的分析","authors":"Junling Zhuang, Hongxia Shi, Xiaoli Liu, Minghui Duan, Xin Du, Ling Qin, Wuhan Hui, Rong Liang, Meifang Wang, Ye Chen, Dongyun Li, Wei Yang, Gusheng Tang, Weihua Zhang, Xia Kuang, Wei Su, Yanqiu Han, Xialu Lan, Limei Chen, Jihong Xu, Zhuogang Liu, Jian Huang, Chunting Zhao, Hongyan Tong, Jianda Hu, Chunyan Chen, Xiequn Chen, Zhijian Xiao, Qian Jiang","doi":"10.1159/000547173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study was aimed to identify the discrepancies in treatment goals and concerns regarding disease management between patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and hematologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study was conducted among patients with MPNs, including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF), and hematologists in China.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1,645 respondents with ET, PV, and MF and 715 hematologist respondents were analyzed. Cure of disease and healthy blood counts as treatment goals were reported more by almost half of the respondents with MPNs than by hematologists. However, prevention of thrombotic events, delayed transformation of disease, improvement of symptoms and better quality of life, and reduction in spleen size were less reported by respondents with MPNs than by hematologists. In multivariate analyses, education, comorbidities, symptom burden, disease duration, and annual out-of-pocket expenses for treatment were significantly associated with the treatment goals of respondents with MPNs. However, female physicians and senior professors paid more attention to these goals. Regarding concerns on MPN-related issues, more respondents with MPNs paid more attention to disease knowledge and restrictions in daily life compared to hematologists, whereas the majority of physicians attached importance to medication-related issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perceptions of patients with MPNs and hematologists differed in terms of treatment goals and concerns of management of MPNs. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were associated with the respondents' perspectives on MPNs. Therefore, sufficient patient-physician communication is suggested to improve treatment satisfaction and compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":6981,"journal":{"name":"Acta Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancies in Treatment Goals and Concerns Regarding Disease Management between Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Hematologists in China: Analysis from a Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Junling Zhuang, Hongxia Shi, Xiaoli Liu, Minghui Duan, Xin Du, Ling Qin, Wuhan Hui, Rong Liang, Meifang Wang, Ye Chen, Dongyun Li, Wei Yang, Gusheng Tang, Weihua Zhang, Xia Kuang, Wei Su, Yanqiu Han, Xialu Lan, Limei Chen, Jihong Xu, Zhuogang Liu, Jian Huang, Chunting Zhao, Hongyan Tong, Jianda Hu, Chunyan Chen, Xiequn Chen, Zhijian Xiao, Qian Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study was aimed to identify the discrepancies in treatment goals and concerns regarding disease management between patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and hematologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study was conducted among patients with MPNs, including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF), and hematologists in China.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1,645 respondents with ET, PV, and MF and 715 hematologist respondents were analyzed. Cure of disease and healthy blood counts as treatment goals were reported more by almost half of the respondents with MPNs than by hematologists. However, prevention of thrombotic events, delayed transformation of disease, improvement of symptoms and better quality of life, and reduction in spleen size were less reported by respondents with MPNs than by hematologists. In multivariate analyses, education, comorbidities, symptom burden, disease duration, and annual out-of-pocket expenses for treatment were significantly associated with the treatment goals of respondents with MPNs. However, female physicians and senior professors paid more attention to these goals. Regarding concerns on MPN-related issues, more respondents with MPNs paid more attention to disease knowledge and restrictions in daily life compared to hematologists, whereas the majority of physicians attached importance to medication-related issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perceptions of patients with MPNs and hematologists differed in terms of treatment goals and concerns of management of MPNs. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were associated with the respondents' perspectives on MPNs. Therefore, sufficient patient-physician communication is suggested to improve treatment satisfaction and compliance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Haematologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Haematologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547173\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discrepancies in Treatment Goals and Concerns Regarding Disease Management between Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Hematologists in China: Analysis from a Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey.
Introduction: This study was aimed to identify the discrepancies in treatment goals and concerns regarding disease management between patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and hematologists.
Methods: A study was conducted among patients with MPNs, including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF), and hematologists in China.
Results: Data from 1,645 respondents with ET, PV, and MF and 715 hematologist respondents were analyzed. Cure of disease and healthy blood counts as treatment goals were reported more by almost half of the respondents with MPNs than by hematologists. However, prevention of thrombotic events, delayed transformation of disease, improvement of symptoms and better quality of life, and reduction in spleen size were less reported by respondents with MPNs than by hematologists. In multivariate analyses, education, comorbidities, symptom burden, disease duration, and annual out-of-pocket expenses for treatment were significantly associated with the treatment goals of respondents with MPNs. However, female physicians and senior professors paid more attention to these goals. Regarding concerns on MPN-related issues, more respondents with MPNs paid more attention to disease knowledge and restrictions in daily life compared to hematologists, whereas the majority of physicians attached importance to medication-related issues.
Conclusion: The perceptions of patients with MPNs and hematologists differed in terms of treatment goals and concerns of management of MPNs. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were associated with the respondents' perspectives on MPNs. Therefore, sufficient patient-physician communication is suggested to improve treatment satisfaction and compliance.
期刊介绍:
''Acta Haematologica'' is a well-established and internationally recognized clinically-oriented journal featuring balanced, wide-ranging coverage of current hematology research. A wealth of information on such problems as anemia, leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, hereditary disorders, blood coagulation, growth factors, hematopoiesis and differentiation is contained in first-rate basic and clinical papers some of which are accompanied by editorial comments by eminent experts. These are supplemented by short state-of-the-art communications, reviews and correspondence as well as occasional special issues devoted to ‘hot topics’ in hematology. These will keep the practicing hematologist well informed of the new developments in the field.