腹腔镜下腹疝修补术的LIRA技术与IPOM +:观察性比较分析。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Stefano Olmi, Davide Moioli, Francesca Ciccarese, Matteo Uccelli, Adelinda Angela Giulia Zanoni, Riccardo Giorgi, Alberto Oldani, Marta Bonaldi, Carolina Rubicondo, Alessandro Del Carro, Yong Ha Lee, Giovanni Cesana
{"title":"腹腔镜下腹疝修补术的LIRA技术与IPOM +:观察性比较分析。","authors":"Stefano Olmi, Davide Moioli, Francesca Ciccarese, Matteo Uccelli, Adelinda Angela Giulia Zanoni, Riccardo Giorgi, Alberto Oldani, Marta Bonaldi, Carolina Rubicondo, Alessandro Del Carro, Yong Ha Lee, Giovanni Cesana","doi":"10.1177/10926429251385785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique with the defect closure technique using sutures and intraperitoneal mesh (IPOM plus), evaluating recurrence and bulging rates at least one year postoperatively. The secondary objective is to compare postoperative complications: seroma and pain at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post-surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients with midline primary ventral and incisional hernias between 4 and 10 cm were included. A CT scan was performed on all patients to assess the correct spatial values preoperatively and at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 50 patients underwent LIRA, and 48 patients underwent IPOM plus between January 2022 and May 2023. The mean defect area in the LIRA group was larger than in the IPOM plus group (63.5 ± 37.5 cm<sup>2</sup> versus 55.2 ± 33.9 cm<sup>2</sup>). In the LIRA group, 2/48 instances of bulging (4.4%) occurred, whereas in the IPOM plus group, there were 6/50 instances of bulging (21.3%) and 2/50 recurrences (6.4%). One month post-surgery, a clinical seroma was observed in 8/48 patients (16%) and 9/50 patients (18.7%) in the LIRA and IPOM plus groups, respectively, with complete resolution at 6 months. Postoperative pain was found to be lower in the LIRA group. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this study, the LIRA technique demonstrated lower rates of bulging, recurrence, and postoperative pain compared with IPOM plus at 1 year of follow-up. Further multicentric prospective studies with a larger patient sample and longer follow-up are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LIRA Technique Versus IPOM Plus for Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral Hernia: An Observational Comparative Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Olmi, Davide Moioli, Francesca Ciccarese, Matteo Uccelli, Adelinda Angela Giulia Zanoni, Riccardo Giorgi, Alberto Oldani, Marta Bonaldi, Carolina Rubicondo, Alessandro Del Carro, Yong Ha Lee, Giovanni Cesana\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10926429251385785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique with the defect closure technique using sutures and intraperitoneal mesh (IPOM plus), evaluating recurrence and bulging rates at least one year postoperatively. The secondary objective is to compare postoperative complications: seroma and pain at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post-surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients with midline primary ventral and incisional hernias between 4 and 10 cm were included. A CT scan was performed on all patients to assess the correct spatial values preoperatively and at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 50 patients underwent LIRA, and 48 patients underwent IPOM plus between January 2022 and May 2023. The mean defect area in the LIRA group was larger than in the IPOM plus group (63.5 ± 37.5 cm<sup>2</sup> versus 55.2 ± 33.9 cm<sup>2</sup>). In the LIRA group, 2/48 instances of bulging (4.4%) occurred, whereas in the IPOM plus group, there were 6/50 instances of bulging (21.3%) and 2/50 recurrences (6.4%). One month post-surgery, a clinical seroma was observed in 8/48 patients (16%) and 9/50 patients (18.7%) in the LIRA and IPOM plus groups, respectively, with complete resolution at 6 months. Postoperative pain was found to be lower in the LIRA group. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this study, the LIRA technique demonstrated lower rates of bulging, recurrence, and postoperative pain compared with IPOM plus at 1 year of follow-up. Further multicentric prospective studies with a larger patient sample and longer follow-up are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429251385785\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429251385785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜腹膜内直肌腱膜成形术(LIRA)技术与使用缝合线和腹膜内补片(IPOM +)的缺陷闭合技术的术后结果,评估术后至少一年的复发率和鼓胀率。次要目的是比较术后并发症:术后30天、6个月和1年的血肿和疼痛。方法:选取4 ~ 10 cm的中线原发性腹疝和切口疝患者。术前、术后1个月、6个月和12个月对所有患者进行CT扫描以评估正确的空间值。采用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛。结果:在2022年1月至2023年5月期间,共有50例患者接受了LIRA, 48例患者接受了IPOM +。LIRA组的平均缺损面积大于IPOM +组(63.5±37.5 cm2 vs 55.2±33.9 cm2)。在LIRA组中,2/48例发生了膨出(4.4%),而在IPOM +组中,6/50例发生了膨出(21.3%),2/50例复发(6.4%)。术后1个月,LIRA和IPOM +组分别有8/48例(16%)和9/50例(18.7%)患者出现临床血肿,6个月完全消退。LIRA组术后疼痛明显减轻。结论:在这项研究中,在1年的随访中,与IPOM +相比,LIRA技术显示出较低的肿胀、复发和术后疼痛率。进一步的多中心前瞻性研究需要更大的患者样本和更长时间的随访才能得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LIRA Technique Versus IPOM Plus for Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral Hernia: An Observational Comparative Analysis.

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique with the defect closure technique using sutures and intraperitoneal mesh (IPOM plus), evaluating recurrence and bulging rates at least one year postoperatively. The secondary objective is to compare postoperative complications: seroma and pain at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post-surgery. Methods: Patients with midline primary ventral and incisional hernias between 4 and 10 cm were included. A CT scan was performed on all patients to assess the correct spatial values preoperatively and at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale. Results: A total of 50 patients underwent LIRA, and 48 patients underwent IPOM plus between January 2022 and May 2023. The mean defect area in the LIRA group was larger than in the IPOM plus group (63.5 ± 37.5 cm2 versus 55.2 ± 33.9 cm2). In the LIRA group, 2/48 instances of bulging (4.4%) occurred, whereas in the IPOM plus group, there were 6/50 instances of bulging (21.3%) and 2/50 recurrences (6.4%). One month post-surgery, a clinical seroma was observed in 8/48 patients (16%) and 9/50 patients (18.7%) in the LIRA and IPOM plus groups, respectively, with complete resolution at 6 months. Postoperative pain was found to be lower in the LIRA group. Conclusions: In this study, the LIRA technique demonstrated lower rates of bulging, recurrence, and postoperative pain compared with IPOM plus at 1 year of follow-up. Further multicentric prospective studies with a larger patient sample and longer follow-up are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信