欧洲共识建议直接胆管镜和胰镜检查使用改进的德尔菲过程。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Enrico Palmeri, Sebastian Stefanovic, Emine Gökce, Velio Ascenti, Andrea Anderloni, Vincenzo Cennamo, Frédéric Prat, George Webster, Deepak Joshi, Jonathan Potts, Terence Wong, Kofi Oppong, Martin James, Matthew Huggett, Jim Portal, Pieter Jan de Jonge, Mark Ellrichmann, Juan J Vila, Ignacio Fernandez-Urien, Marianne Udd, Leena Kylänpää, Wim Laleman, Jan Werner Poley, Petko Karagyozov, Frans van der Heide, Jan J Koornstra, Emad S Aljahdli, Christian Gerges, Rogier P Voermans, George Goodchild, Akin Inderson, Stefano Francesco Crinó, Marco J Bruno, David M de Jong, Pieter Hindryckx
{"title":"欧洲共识建议直接胆管镜和胰镜检查使用改进的德尔菲过程。","authors":"Enrico Palmeri, Sebastian Stefanovic, Emine Gökce, Velio Ascenti, Andrea Anderloni, Vincenzo Cennamo, Frédéric Prat, George Webster, Deepak Joshi, Jonathan Potts, Terence Wong, Kofi Oppong, Martin James, Matthew Huggett, Jim Portal, Pieter Jan de Jonge, Mark Ellrichmann, Juan J Vila, Ignacio Fernandez-Urien, Marianne Udd, Leena Kylänpää, Wim Laleman, Jan Werner Poley, Petko Karagyozov, Frans van der Heide, Jan J Koornstra, Emad S Aljahdli, Christian Gerges, Rogier P Voermans, George Goodchild, Akin Inderson, Stefano Francesco Crinó, Marco J Bruno, David M de Jong, Pieter Hindryckx","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Direct cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy have become widely implemented techniques in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of several pancreaticobiliary disorders. This study aimed to generate general and indication-specific European consensus recommendations on cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Supported by the available literature, statements were formulated and grouped into the following categories: (1) pre-procedural considerations, (2) general technical aspects, (3) biliopancreatic stones, (4) biliary strictures, and (5) other indications. The evidence level of each statement was determined using the GRADE methodology. Cholangioscopy experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process. When 80% consensus was not reached, the statement was modified based on expert feedback and subjected to an additional Delphi round. Statements were rejected if they failed to reach consensus after three Delphi rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty cholangioscopy experts completed the Delphi process. Forty-two (97.6%) generated statements were accepted, of which 39 (92.9%) in the first Delphi round. 12 statements on preprocedural and periprocedural settings, 8 statements on biliopancreatic stones, 13 statements on biliary strictures, and 9 statements on other indications were accepted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a modified Delphi process, we developed general and indication-specific consensus recommendations for cholangioscopy to guide clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Consensus Recommendations for Direct Cholangioscopy and Pancreatoscopy Using a Modified Delphi Process.\",\"authors\":\"Enrico Palmeri, Sebastian Stefanovic, Emine Gökce, Velio Ascenti, Andrea Anderloni, Vincenzo Cennamo, Frédéric Prat, George Webster, Deepak Joshi, Jonathan Potts, Terence Wong, Kofi Oppong, Martin James, Matthew Huggett, Jim Portal, Pieter Jan de Jonge, Mark Ellrichmann, Juan J Vila, Ignacio Fernandez-Urien, Marianne Udd, Leena Kylänpää, Wim Laleman, Jan Werner Poley, Petko Karagyozov, Frans van der Heide, Jan J Koornstra, Emad S Aljahdli, Christian Gerges, Rogier P Voermans, George Goodchild, Akin Inderson, Stefano Francesco Crinó, Marco J Bruno, David M de Jong, Pieter Hindryckx\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ueg2.70123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Direct cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy have become widely implemented techniques in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of several pancreaticobiliary disorders. This study aimed to generate general and indication-specific European consensus recommendations on cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Supported by the available literature, statements were formulated and grouped into the following categories: (1) pre-procedural considerations, (2) general technical aspects, (3) biliopancreatic stones, (4) biliary strictures, and (5) other indications. The evidence level of each statement was determined using the GRADE methodology. Cholangioscopy experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process. When 80% consensus was not reached, the statement was modified based on expert feedback and subjected to an additional Delphi round. Statements were rejected if they failed to reach consensus after three Delphi rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty cholangioscopy experts completed the Delphi process. Forty-two (97.6%) generated statements were accepted, of which 39 (92.9%) in the first Delphi round. 12 statements on preprocedural and periprocedural settings, 8 statements on biliopancreatic stones, 13 statements on biliary strictures, and 9 statements on other indications were accepted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a modified Delphi process, we developed general and indication-specific consensus recommendations for cholangioscopy to guide clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70123\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:直接胆道镜检查和胰镜检查已成为多种胰胆道疾病的诊断和治疗方法中广泛应用的技术。本研究旨在对胆管镜检查和胰镜检查产生一般和特定适应症的欧洲共识建议。方法:在现有文献的支持下,将陈述制定并分为以下几类:(1)术前考虑,(2)一般技术方面,(3)胆胰结石,(4)胆道狭窄,(5)其他适应症。使用GRADE方法确定每个陈述的证据水平。胆道镜专家被邀请参加一个改进的德尔菲程序。当没有达到80%的共识时,根据专家反馈对声明进行修改,并进行额外的德尔菲轮。如果在三轮德尔菲会议后未能达成一致意见,声明将被拒绝。结果:30名胆道镜专家完成了德尔菲程序。42个(97.6%)生成的语句被接受,其中39个(92.9%)在第一轮德尔菲中被接受。12项术前和围手术期检查,8项胆道结石检查,13项胆道狭窄检查,9项其他适应症检查。结论:使用改进的德尔菲过程,我们制定了胆管镜检查的一般和特定适应症的共识建议,以指导临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
European Consensus Recommendations for Direct Cholangioscopy and Pancreatoscopy Using a Modified Delphi Process.

Background and aim: Direct cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy have become widely implemented techniques in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of several pancreaticobiliary disorders. This study aimed to generate general and indication-specific European consensus recommendations on cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy.

Methods: Supported by the available literature, statements were formulated and grouped into the following categories: (1) pre-procedural considerations, (2) general technical aspects, (3) biliopancreatic stones, (4) biliary strictures, and (5) other indications. The evidence level of each statement was determined using the GRADE methodology. Cholangioscopy experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process. When 80% consensus was not reached, the statement was modified based on expert feedback and subjected to an additional Delphi round. Statements were rejected if they failed to reach consensus after three Delphi rounds.

Results: Thirty cholangioscopy experts completed the Delphi process. Forty-two (97.6%) generated statements were accepted, of which 39 (92.9%) in the first Delphi round. 12 statements on preprocedural and periprocedural settings, 8 statements on biliopancreatic stones, 13 statements on biliary strictures, and 9 statements on other indications were accepted.

Conclusion: Using a modified Delphi process, we developed general and indication-specific consensus recommendations for cholangioscopy to guide clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
United European Gastroenterology Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
147
期刊介绍: United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信