Enrico Palmeri, Sebastian Stefanovic, Emine Gökce, Velio Ascenti, Andrea Anderloni, Vincenzo Cennamo, Frédéric Prat, George Webster, Deepak Joshi, Jonathan Potts, Terence Wong, Kofi Oppong, Martin James, Matthew Huggett, Jim Portal, Pieter Jan de Jonge, Mark Ellrichmann, Juan J Vila, Ignacio Fernandez-Urien, Marianne Udd, Leena Kylänpää, Wim Laleman, Jan Werner Poley, Petko Karagyozov, Frans van der Heide, Jan J Koornstra, Emad S Aljahdli, Christian Gerges, Rogier P Voermans, George Goodchild, Akin Inderson, Stefano Francesco Crinó, Marco J Bruno, David M de Jong, Pieter Hindryckx
{"title":"欧洲共识建议直接胆管镜和胰镜检查使用改进的德尔菲过程。","authors":"Enrico Palmeri, Sebastian Stefanovic, Emine Gökce, Velio Ascenti, Andrea Anderloni, Vincenzo Cennamo, Frédéric Prat, George Webster, Deepak Joshi, Jonathan Potts, Terence Wong, Kofi Oppong, Martin James, Matthew Huggett, Jim Portal, Pieter Jan de Jonge, Mark Ellrichmann, Juan J Vila, Ignacio Fernandez-Urien, Marianne Udd, Leena Kylänpää, Wim Laleman, Jan Werner Poley, Petko Karagyozov, Frans van der Heide, Jan J Koornstra, Emad S Aljahdli, Christian Gerges, Rogier P Voermans, George Goodchild, Akin Inderson, Stefano Francesco Crinó, Marco J Bruno, David M de Jong, Pieter Hindryckx","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Direct cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy have become widely implemented techniques in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of several pancreaticobiliary disorders. This study aimed to generate general and indication-specific European consensus recommendations on cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Supported by the available literature, statements were formulated and grouped into the following categories: (1) pre-procedural considerations, (2) general technical aspects, (3) biliopancreatic stones, (4) biliary strictures, and (5) other indications. The evidence level of each statement was determined using the GRADE methodology. Cholangioscopy experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process. When 80% consensus was not reached, the statement was modified based on expert feedback and subjected to an additional Delphi round. Statements were rejected if they failed to reach consensus after three Delphi rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty cholangioscopy experts completed the Delphi process. Forty-two (97.6%) generated statements were accepted, of which 39 (92.9%) in the first Delphi round. 12 statements on preprocedural and periprocedural settings, 8 statements on biliopancreatic stones, 13 statements on biliary strictures, and 9 statements on other indications were accepted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a modified Delphi process, we developed general and indication-specific consensus recommendations for cholangioscopy to guide clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Consensus Recommendations for Direct Cholangioscopy and Pancreatoscopy Using a Modified Delphi Process.\",\"authors\":\"Enrico Palmeri, Sebastian Stefanovic, Emine Gökce, Velio Ascenti, Andrea Anderloni, Vincenzo Cennamo, Frédéric Prat, George Webster, Deepak Joshi, Jonathan Potts, Terence Wong, Kofi Oppong, Martin James, Matthew Huggett, Jim Portal, Pieter Jan de Jonge, Mark Ellrichmann, Juan J Vila, Ignacio Fernandez-Urien, Marianne Udd, Leena Kylänpää, Wim Laleman, Jan Werner Poley, Petko Karagyozov, Frans van der Heide, Jan J Koornstra, Emad S Aljahdli, Christian Gerges, Rogier P Voermans, George Goodchild, Akin Inderson, Stefano Francesco Crinó, Marco J Bruno, David M de Jong, Pieter Hindryckx\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ueg2.70123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Direct cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy have become widely implemented techniques in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of several pancreaticobiliary disorders. This study aimed to generate general and indication-specific European consensus recommendations on cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Supported by the available literature, statements were formulated and grouped into the following categories: (1) pre-procedural considerations, (2) general technical aspects, (3) biliopancreatic stones, (4) biliary strictures, and (5) other indications. The evidence level of each statement was determined using the GRADE methodology. Cholangioscopy experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process. When 80% consensus was not reached, the statement was modified based on expert feedback and subjected to an additional Delphi round. Statements were rejected if they failed to reach consensus after three Delphi rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty cholangioscopy experts completed the Delphi process. Forty-two (97.6%) generated statements were accepted, of which 39 (92.9%) in the first Delphi round. 12 statements on preprocedural and periprocedural settings, 8 statements on biliopancreatic stones, 13 statements on biliary strictures, and 9 statements on other indications were accepted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a modified Delphi process, we developed general and indication-specific consensus recommendations for cholangioscopy to guide clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70123\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
European Consensus Recommendations for Direct Cholangioscopy and Pancreatoscopy Using a Modified Delphi Process.
Background and aim: Direct cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy have become widely implemented techniques in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of several pancreaticobiliary disorders. This study aimed to generate general and indication-specific European consensus recommendations on cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy.
Methods: Supported by the available literature, statements were formulated and grouped into the following categories: (1) pre-procedural considerations, (2) general technical aspects, (3) biliopancreatic stones, (4) biliary strictures, and (5) other indications. The evidence level of each statement was determined using the GRADE methodology. Cholangioscopy experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process. When 80% consensus was not reached, the statement was modified based on expert feedback and subjected to an additional Delphi round. Statements were rejected if they failed to reach consensus after three Delphi rounds.
Results: Thirty cholangioscopy experts completed the Delphi process. Forty-two (97.6%) generated statements were accepted, of which 39 (92.9%) in the first Delphi round. 12 statements on preprocedural and periprocedural settings, 8 statements on biliopancreatic stones, 13 statements on biliary strictures, and 9 statements on other indications were accepted.
Conclusion: Using a modified Delphi process, we developed general and indication-specific consensus recommendations for cholangioscopy to guide clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.