循环肿瘤dna引导局部晚期结肠癌的辅助治疗:随机2/3期DYNAMIC-III试验

IF 50 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Jeanne Tie, Yuxuan Wang, Jonathan M Loree, Joshua D Cohen, Rachel Wong, Timothy Price, Niall C Tebbutt, Val Gebski, David Espinoza, Matthew Burge, Sam Harris, James Lynam, Belinda Lee, Margaret M Lee, Daniel Breadner, Marlyse Debrincat, Siavash Foroughi, Lorraine Chantrill, Stephanie H Lim, Sharlene Gill, Chris O'Callaghan, Janine Ptak, Natalie Silliman, Lisa Dobbyn, Maria Popoli, Chetan Bettegowda, Nicholas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W Kinzler, Bert Vogelstein, Peter Gibbs
{"title":"循环肿瘤dna引导局部晚期结肠癌的辅助治疗:随机2/3期DYNAMIC-III试验","authors":"Jeanne Tie, Yuxuan Wang, Jonathan M Loree, Joshua D Cohen, Rachel Wong, Timothy Price, Niall C Tebbutt, Val Gebski, David Espinoza, Matthew Burge, Sam Harris, James Lynam, Belinda Lee, Margaret M Lee, Daniel Breadner, Marlyse Debrincat, Siavash Foroughi, Lorraine Chantrill, Stephanie H Lim, Sharlene Gill, Chris O'Callaghan, Janine Ptak, Natalie Silliman, Lisa Dobbyn, Maria Popoli, Chetan Bettegowda, Nicholas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W Kinzler, Bert Vogelstein, Peter Gibbs","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-04030-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer provides uncertain benefit at the individual level. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may help refine risk-adjusted treatment selection. In this multicenter, randomized, phase 2/3 trial, patients with stage III colon cancer underwent ctDNA testing 5-6 weeks after surgery and were assigned (1:1) to ctDNA-guided or standard management. In the ctDNA-guided arm, patients negative for ctDNA received de-escalated therapy, whereas ctDNA-positive patients received escalated therapy. Clinicians prespecified the standard regimen. Primary endpoints were 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for ctDNA-negative patients and 2-year RFS for ctDNA-positive patients. Secondary endpoints included treatment-related hospitalization and ctDNA clearance. Among 968 evaluable patients, 702 (72.5%) were ctDNA negative. With a median follow-up of 47 months, ctDNA-negative patients experienced significantly fewer recurrences than ctDNA-positive patients (3-year RFS 87% versus 49%; P < 0.001). In ctDNA-negative patients, de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin use (34.8% versus 88.6%) and hospitalizations (8.5% versus 13.2%) but yielded slightly lower RFS than standard management (85.3% versus 88.1%), not meeting the non-inferiority margin. In ctDNA-positive patients, higher ctDNA burden correlated with recurrence risk (3-year RFS 77% to 23% across quartiles; P < 0.001). Escalated therapy did not improve outcomes over standard management (2-year RFS 51% versus 61%). There was no unexpected toxicity. Persistent ctDNA after treatment predicted markedly worse prognosis (3-year RFS 14% versus 79%). ctDNA is validated as a strong prognostic classifier. ctDNA-guided de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin exposure and adverse events with outcomes approaching standard of care, whereas exploratory chemotherapy intensification conferred no RFS benefit, suggesting a need for novel strategies in ctDNA-positive disease.Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12617001566325 .</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circulating tumor DNA-guided adjuvant therapy in locally advanced colon cancer: the randomized phase 2/3 DYNAMIC-III trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jeanne Tie, Yuxuan Wang, Jonathan M Loree, Joshua D Cohen, Rachel Wong, Timothy Price, Niall C Tebbutt, Val Gebski, David Espinoza, Matthew Burge, Sam Harris, James Lynam, Belinda Lee, Margaret M Lee, Daniel Breadner, Marlyse Debrincat, Siavash Foroughi, Lorraine Chantrill, Stephanie H Lim, Sharlene Gill, Chris O'Callaghan, Janine Ptak, Natalie Silliman, Lisa Dobbyn, Maria Popoli, Chetan Bettegowda, Nicholas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W Kinzler, Bert Vogelstein, Peter Gibbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-04030-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer provides uncertain benefit at the individual level. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may help refine risk-adjusted treatment selection. In this multicenter, randomized, phase 2/3 trial, patients with stage III colon cancer underwent ctDNA testing 5-6 weeks after surgery and were assigned (1:1) to ctDNA-guided or standard management. In the ctDNA-guided arm, patients negative for ctDNA received de-escalated therapy, whereas ctDNA-positive patients received escalated therapy. Clinicians prespecified the standard regimen. Primary endpoints were 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for ctDNA-negative patients and 2-year RFS for ctDNA-positive patients. Secondary endpoints included treatment-related hospitalization and ctDNA clearance. Among 968 evaluable patients, 702 (72.5%) were ctDNA negative. With a median follow-up of 47 months, ctDNA-negative patients experienced significantly fewer recurrences than ctDNA-positive patients (3-year RFS 87% versus 49%; P < 0.001). In ctDNA-negative patients, de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin use (34.8% versus 88.6%) and hospitalizations (8.5% versus 13.2%) but yielded slightly lower RFS than standard management (85.3% versus 88.1%), not meeting the non-inferiority margin. In ctDNA-positive patients, higher ctDNA burden correlated with recurrence risk (3-year RFS 77% to 23% across quartiles; P < 0.001). Escalated therapy did not improve outcomes over standard management (2-year RFS 51% versus 61%). There was no unexpected toxicity. Persistent ctDNA after treatment predicted markedly worse prognosis (3-year RFS 14% versus 79%). ctDNA is validated as a strong prognostic classifier. ctDNA-guided de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin exposure and adverse events with outcomes approaching standard of care, whereas exploratory chemotherapy intensification conferred no RFS benefit, suggesting a need for novel strategies in ctDNA-positive disease.Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12617001566325 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":50.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-04030-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-04030-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

III期结肠癌的辅助化疗在个体水平上提供不确定的益处。循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)可能有助于改进风险调整治疗选择。在这项多中心、随机、2/3期试验中,III期结肠癌患者在手术后5-6周接受ctDNA检测,并按1:1的比例被分配到ctDNA引导或标准治疗组。在ctDNA引导组中,ctDNA阴性的患者接受降级治疗,而ctDNA阳性的患者接受升级治疗。临床医生预先指定了标准方案。主要终点是ctdna阴性患者的3年无复发生存期(RFS)和ctdna阳性患者的2年RFS。次要终点包括治疗相关住院和ctDNA清除率。在968例可评估患者中,702例(72.5%)为ctDNA阴性。中位随访时间为47个月,ctdna阴性患者的复发率明显低于ctdna阳性患者(3年RFS 87% vs 49%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Circulating tumor DNA-guided adjuvant therapy in locally advanced colon cancer: the randomized phase 2/3 DYNAMIC-III trial.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer provides uncertain benefit at the individual level. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may help refine risk-adjusted treatment selection. In this multicenter, randomized, phase 2/3 trial, patients with stage III colon cancer underwent ctDNA testing 5-6 weeks after surgery and were assigned (1:1) to ctDNA-guided or standard management. In the ctDNA-guided arm, patients negative for ctDNA received de-escalated therapy, whereas ctDNA-positive patients received escalated therapy. Clinicians prespecified the standard regimen. Primary endpoints were 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for ctDNA-negative patients and 2-year RFS for ctDNA-positive patients. Secondary endpoints included treatment-related hospitalization and ctDNA clearance. Among 968 evaluable patients, 702 (72.5%) were ctDNA negative. With a median follow-up of 47 months, ctDNA-negative patients experienced significantly fewer recurrences than ctDNA-positive patients (3-year RFS 87% versus 49%; P < 0.001). In ctDNA-negative patients, de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin use (34.8% versus 88.6%) and hospitalizations (8.5% versus 13.2%) but yielded slightly lower RFS than standard management (85.3% versus 88.1%), not meeting the non-inferiority margin. In ctDNA-positive patients, higher ctDNA burden correlated with recurrence risk (3-year RFS 77% to 23% across quartiles; P < 0.001). Escalated therapy did not improve outcomes over standard management (2-year RFS 51% versus 61%). There was no unexpected toxicity. Persistent ctDNA after treatment predicted markedly worse prognosis (3-year RFS 14% versus 79%). ctDNA is validated as a strong prognostic classifier. ctDNA-guided de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin exposure and adverse events with outcomes approaching standard of care, whereas exploratory chemotherapy intensification conferred no RFS benefit, suggesting a need for novel strategies in ctDNA-positive disease.Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12617001566325 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信