脑脊液中肠病毒检测的实时荧光定量PCR评价

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Grace Perkins, Jennifer Swink, Kevin Wade, Lori Hughes, Bijal A Parikh, Neil Anderson
{"title":"脑脊液中肠病毒检测的实时荧光定量PCR评价","authors":"Grace Perkins, Jennifer Swink, Kevin Wade, Lori Hughes, Bijal A Parikh, Neil Anderson","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00864-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enteroviruses frequently cause aseptic meningitis, necessitating differentiation from bacterial meningitis to avoid unnecessary antimicrobial treatment and improve patient management. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) remains the gold standard for enterovirus detection in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) due to its high sensitivity and rapid turnaround time. The discontinuation of the Cepheid Xpert EV assay has created a gap in diagnostics. This study aimed to optimize two laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays using Diasorin direct amplification disc (DAD) and universal disc (UD) methods compared to the previously standard Cepheid Xpert EV assay. A total of 87 clinical CSF specimens were tested to assess sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance. There was no significant difference between the performance of the three assays compared to standard of care results. The Xpert EV and DAD methods had a 79.6% positive agreement, while the UD method had an 86.4% positive agreement. All methods achieved 100% negative agreement. Specificity testing against non-enteroviral pathogens confirmed no cross-reactivity. The estimated limit of detection was 100 copies/mL for Xpert EV, 250 copies/mL for UD, and 1,000 copies/mL for DAD, though clinical sensitivity remained high. Blood contamination affected the DAD assay but not the UD method due to its RNA extraction step. This study demonstrates the potential of DAD and UD methods as viable alternatives for rapid enterovirus detection in CSF, essential for patient management following the discontinuation of the Xpert EV assay. Further validation and comparison are needed for broader clinical applications.IMPORTANCERapid and accurate detection of enteroviruses in cerebrospinal fluid is crucial for patient management in cases of aseptic meningitis, especially following the discontinuation of the Cepheid Xpert EV assay. This study evaluates two laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays utilizing Diasorin direct amplification disc and universal disc methods, demonstrating their potential as viable alternatives for enterovirus detection with high sensitivity and specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0086425"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a sample-to-answer real-time PCR assay for enterovirus detection in cerebrospinal fluid.\",\"authors\":\"Grace Perkins, Jennifer Swink, Kevin Wade, Lori Hughes, Bijal A Parikh, Neil Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jcm.00864-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Enteroviruses frequently cause aseptic meningitis, necessitating differentiation from bacterial meningitis to avoid unnecessary antimicrobial treatment and improve patient management. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) remains the gold standard for enterovirus detection in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) due to its high sensitivity and rapid turnaround time. The discontinuation of the Cepheid Xpert EV assay has created a gap in diagnostics. This study aimed to optimize two laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays using Diasorin direct amplification disc (DAD) and universal disc (UD) methods compared to the previously standard Cepheid Xpert EV assay. A total of 87 clinical CSF specimens were tested to assess sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance. There was no significant difference between the performance of the three assays compared to standard of care results. The Xpert EV and DAD methods had a 79.6% positive agreement, while the UD method had an 86.4% positive agreement. All methods achieved 100% negative agreement. Specificity testing against non-enteroviral pathogens confirmed no cross-reactivity. The estimated limit of detection was 100 copies/mL for Xpert EV, 250 copies/mL for UD, and 1,000 copies/mL for DAD, though clinical sensitivity remained high. Blood contamination affected the DAD assay but not the UD method due to its RNA extraction step. This study demonstrates the potential of DAD and UD methods as viable alternatives for rapid enterovirus detection in CSF, essential for patient management following the discontinuation of the Xpert EV assay. Further validation and comparison are needed for broader clinical applications.IMPORTANCERapid and accurate detection of enteroviruses in cerebrospinal fluid is crucial for patient management in cases of aseptic meningitis, especially following the discontinuation of the Cepheid Xpert EV assay. This study evaluates two laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays utilizing Diasorin direct amplification disc and universal disc methods, demonstrating their potential as viable alternatives for enterovirus detection with high sensitivity and specificity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0086425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00864-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00864-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肠病毒经常引起无菌性脑膜炎,需要与细菌性脑膜炎区分开来,以避免不必要的抗菌治疗并改善患者管理。聚合酶链反应(PCR)由于其高灵敏度和快速周转时间,仍然是检测脑脊液(CSF)中肠病毒的金标准。造父变星Xpert EV检测的终止在诊断方面造成了空白。本研究旨在优化实验室开发的两种实时PCR检测方法,分别使用Diasorin直接扩增盘(DAD)和通用盘(UD)方法,与之前标准的造父变星Xpert EV检测方法进行比较。共检测87例临床CSF标本,以评估敏感性、特异性和总体表现。与标准护理结果相比,这三种检测方法的性能没有显著差异。Xpert EV法与DAD法阳性符合率为79.6%,UD法阳性符合率为86.4%。所有方法均达到100%阴性一致。对非肠病毒病原体的特异性检测证实无交叉反应。Xpert EV的估计检出限为100拷贝/mL, UD为250拷贝/mL, DAD为1000拷贝/mL,但临床敏感性仍然很高。血液污染影响DAD法,但不影响UD法,因为它的RNA提取步骤。这项研究证明了DAD和UD方法作为脑脊液中肠道病毒快速检测的可行替代方法的潜力,对于Xpert EV检测停止后的患者管理至关重要。为了更广泛的临床应用,需要进一步的验证和比较。重要性:快速准确地检测脑脊液中的肠病毒对无菌性脑膜炎患者的治疗至关重要,特别是在造父变星Xpert EV检测停止后。本研究评估了两种实验室开发的实时PCR检测方法,分别采用Diasorin直接扩增盘和通用盘方法,证明了它们作为肠道病毒检测的可行替代方法的潜力,具有高灵敏度和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a sample-to-answer real-time PCR assay for enterovirus detection in cerebrospinal fluid.

Enteroviruses frequently cause aseptic meningitis, necessitating differentiation from bacterial meningitis to avoid unnecessary antimicrobial treatment and improve patient management. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) remains the gold standard for enterovirus detection in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) due to its high sensitivity and rapid turnaround time. The discontinuation of the Cepheid Xpert EV assay has created a gap in diagnostics. This study aimed to optimize two laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays using Diasorin direct amplification disc (DAD) and universal disc (UD) methods compared to the previously standard Cepheid Xpert EV assay. A total of 87 clinical CSF specimens were tested to assess sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance. There was no significant difference between the performance of the three assays compared to standard of care results. The Xpert EV and DAD methods had a 79.6% positive agreement, while the UD method had an 86.4% positive agreement. All methods achieved 100% negative agreement. Specificity testing against non-enteroviral pathogens confirmed no cross-reactivity. The estimated limit of detection was 100 copies/mL for Xpert EV, 250 copies/mL for UD, and 1,000 copies/mL for DAD, though clinical sensitivity remained high. Blood contamination affected the DAD assay but not the UD method due to its RNA extraction step. This study demonstrates the potential of DAD and UD methods as viable alternatives for rapid enterovirus detection in CSF, essential for patient management following the discontinuation of the Xpert EV assay. Further validation and comparison are needed for broader clinical applications.IMPORTANCERapid and accurate detection of enteroviruses in cerebrospinal fluid is crucial for patient management in cases of aseptic meningitis, especially following the discontinuation of the Cepheid Xpert EV assay. This study evaluates two laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays utilizing Diasorin direct amplification disc and universal disc methods, demonstrating their potential as viable alternatives for enterovirus detection with high sensitivity and specificity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信