Lavannya Sabharwal, Amorina Purpora, Derek Gerstbrein, Kennah Konrad, Brian Meisch, Nicolette Athanasiou, Ester Sala, Martí Juanola-Falgarona, Nestor Camenforte, Rebecca Smith-Aguasca, Pau Boher, Sarah Johnson, Matthew L Faron, Macy G Wood
{"title":"QIAstat-Dx胃肠道检测板2对多种商业检测艰难梭菌的性能评价","authors":"Lavannya Sabharwal, Amorina Purpora, Derek Gerstbrein, Kennah Konrad, Brian Meisch, Nicolette Athanasiou, Ester Sala, Martí Juanola-Falgarona, Nestor Camenforte, Rebecca Smith-Aguasca, Pau Boher, Sarah Johnson, Matthew L Faron, Macy G Wood","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00576-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute gastroenteritis is caused by a variety of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites, which may have overlapping clinical signs and symptoms. Community-acquired gastroenteritis is caused by various pathogens, while healthcare-associated gastroenteritis is caused by <i>Clostridioides difficile</i>. Current diagnostic approaches utilize <i>C. difficile</i> nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) alone or in combination with an enzyme immunoassay for <i>C. difficile</i> antigen and toxin. This study evaluates the analytical performance of <i>C. difficile</i> target detection from 290 clinical specimens using the QIAstat-Dx multiplex gastrointestinal panel (GIP) 2 compared with four commercially available NAATs (Cepheid Xpert <i>C. difficile</i>, BD MAX Cdiff, Verigene CDF, and BioFire GI panel) as well as the <i>C. difficile</i> immunoassay. The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated for all assays in the study. All molecular assays demonstrated a PPA greater than 85%, and an NPA greater than 96% when compared to the other NAATs. The QIAstat-Dx GIP 2 performance was comparable to the other NAATs, demonstrating 95.0%, 88.5%, 98.1%, and 93.7% PPA and 98.2%, 96.9%, 96.6%, and 99.1% NPA compared to Cepheid Xpert <i>C. difficile</i>, BD MAX Cdiff, Verigene CDF, and BioFire GI panel, respectively. Overall, the QIAstat-Dx GIP 2 assay was accurate and comparable to other commercially available methods, and the short assay setup time offers an efficient laboratory stool testing workflow.IMPORTANCE<i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection ranges from diarrhea to severe, life-threatening pseudomembranous colitis. Clinical criteria include three or more liquid stools in 24 h, while diagnostic testing includes nucleic acid tests alone or in combination with an enzyme immunoassay for <i>C. difficile</i> antigen and toxin. This study evaluates the analytical performance of <i>C. difficile</i> detection from clinical specimens using the QIAstat-Dx multiplex gastrointestinal panel compared with four commercial assays (Cepheid Xpert <i>C. difficile</i>, BD MAX Cdiff, Verigene CDF assays, and BioFire GI panel) and a <i>C. difficile</i> immunoassay. The BioFire GI panel had the highest positive percent agreement (90-100%), followed by the QIAstat-Dx (88-98%), BD MAX (87-98%), and the Xpert assays (86-96%). The QIAstat-Dx demonstrated high positive and negative agreement with all nucleic acid tests. The short assay setup time for the QIAstat-Dx GIP 2 also offers a streamlined testing workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0057625"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx gastrointestinal panel 2 for the detection of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> against multiple commercial assays.\",\"authors\":\"Lavannya Sabharwal, Amorina Purpora, Derek Gerstbrein, Kennah Konrad, Brian Meisch, Nicolette Athanasiou, Ester Sala, Martí Juanola-Falgarona, Nestor Camenforte, Rebecca Smith-Aguasca, Pau Boher, Sarah Johnson, Matthew L Faron, Macy G Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jcm.00576-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acute gastroenteritis is caused by a variety of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites, which may have overlapping clinical signs and symptoms. Community-acquired gastroenteritis is caused by various pathogens, while healthcare-associated gastroenteritis is caused by <i>Clostridioides difficile</i>. Current diagnostic approaches utilize <i>C. difficile</i> nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) alone or in combination with an enzyme immunoassay for <i>C. difficile</i> antigen and toxin. This study evaluates the analytical performance of <i>C. difficile</i> target detection from 290 clinical specimens using the QIAstat-Dx multiplex gastrointestinal panel (GIP) 2 compared with four commercially available NAATs (Cepheid Xpert <i>C. difficile</i>, BD MAX Cdiff, Verigene CDF, and BioFire GI panel) as well as the <i>C. difficile</i> immunoassay. The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated for all assays in the study. All molecular assays demonstrated a PPA greater than 85%, and an NPA greater than 96% when compared to the other NAATs. The QIAstat-Dx GIP 2 performance was comparable to the other NAATs, demonstrating 95.0%, 88.5%, 98.1%, and 93.7% PPA and 98.2%, 96.9%, 96.6%, and 99.1% NPA compared to Cepheid Xpert <i>C. difficile</i>, BD MAX Cdiff, Verigene CDF, and BioFire GI panel, respectively. Overall, the QIAstat-Dx GIP 2 assay was accurate and comparable to other commercially available methods, and the short assay setup time offers an efficient laboratory stool testing workflow.IMPORTANCE<i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection ranges from diarrhea to severe, life-threatening pseudomembranous colitis. Clinical criteria include three or more liquid stools in 24 h, while diagnostic testing includes nucleic acid tests alone or in combination with an enzyme immunoassay for <i>C. difficile</i> antigen and toxin. This study evaluates the analytical performance of <i>C. difficile</i> detection from clinical specimens using the QIAstat-Dx multiplex gastrointestinal panel compared with four commercial assays (Cepheid Xpert <i>C. difficile</i>, BD MAX Cdiff, Verigene CDF assays, and BioFire GI panel) and a <i>C. difficile</i> immunoassay. The BioFire GI panel had the highest positive percent agreement (90-100%), followed by the QIAstat-Dx (88-98%), BD MAX (87-98%), and the Xpert assays (86-96%). The QIAstat-Dx demonstrated high positive and negative agreement with all nucleic acid tests. The short assay setup time for the QIAstat-Dx GIP 2 also offers a streamlined testing workflow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0057625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00576-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00576-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
急性胃肠炎是由多种病原体引起的,包括细菌、病毒和寄生虫,这些病原体可能有重叠的临床症状和体征。社区获得性胃肠炎是由多种病原体引起的,而卫生保健相关的胃肠炎是由艰难梭菌引起的。目前的诊断方法使用艰难梭菌核酸扩增试验(NAATs)单独或结合艰难梭菌抗原和毒素的酶免疫测定。本研究评估了使用QIAstat-Dx多重胃肠道面板(GIP) 2与四种市售NAATs (Cepheid Xpert C. difficile, BD MAX Cdiff, Verigene CDF和BioFire GI面板)以及艰难梭菌免疫测定法对290个临床标本进行艰难梭菌靶检测的分析性能。计算研究中所有检测的正一致性百分比(PPA)和负一致性百分比(NPA)。与其他naat相比,所有分子测定均显示PPA大于85%,NPA大于96%。QIAstat-Dx GIP 2的表现与其他naat相当,与Cepheid Xpert C. difficile、BD MAX Cdiff、Verigene CDF和BioFire GI面板相比,PPA分别为95.0%、88.5%、98.1%和93.7%,NPA分别为98.2%、96.9%、96.6%和99.1%。总的来说,QIAstat-Dx GIP 2检测是准确的,可与其他市售方法相媲美,并且较短的检测设置时间提供了高效的实验室粪便检测工作流程。艰难梭菌感染的范围从腹泻到严重的、危及生命的假膜性结肠炎。临床标准包括24小时内三次或更多的液体便,而诊断检测包括单独的核酸检测或结合艰难梭菌抗原和毒素的酶免疫测定。本研究评估了使用QIAstat-Dx多重胃肠道面板对临床标本中艰难梭菌检测的分析性能,并与四种商业检测方法(Cepheid Xpert艰难梭菌,BD MAX Cdiff, Verigene CDF检测和BioFire GI面板)和艰难梭菌免疫检测进行了比较。BioFire GI面板的阳性符合率最高(90-100%),其次是QIAstat-Dx(88-98%)、BD MAX(87-98%)和Xpert(86-96%)。QIAstat-Dx与所有核酸检测结果均具有较高的阳性和阴性符合性。QIAstat-Dx GIP 2的检测设置时间短,也提供了简化的测试工作流程。
Performance evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx gastrointestinal panel 2 for the detection of Clostridioides difficile against multiple commercial assays.
Acute gastroenteritis is caused by a variety of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites, which may have overlapping clinical signs and symptoms. Community-acquired gastroenteritis is caused by various pathogens, while healthcare-associated gastroenteritis is caused by Clostridioides difficile. Current diagnostic approaches utilize C. difficile nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) alone or in combination with an enzyme immunoassay for C. difficile antigen and toxin. This study evaluates the analytical performance of C. difficile target detection from 290 clinical specimens using the QIAstat-Dx multiplex gastrointestinal panel (GIP) 2 compared with four commercially available NAATs (Cepheid Xpert C. difficile, BD MAX Cdiff, Verigene CDF, and BioFire GI panel) as well as the C. difficile immunoassay. The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated for all assays in the study. All molecular assays demonstrated a PPA greater than 85%, and an NPA greater than 96% when compared to the other NAATs. The QIAstat-Dx GIP 2 performance was comparable to the other NAATs, demonstrating 95.0%, 88.5%, 98.1%, and 93.7% PPA and 98.2%, 96.9%, 96.6%, and 99.1% NPA compared to Cepheid Xpert C. difficile, BD MAX Cdiff, Verigene CDF, and BioFire GI panel, respectively. Overall, the QIAstat-Dx GIP 2 assay was accurate and comparable to other commercially available methods, and the short assay setup time offers an efficient laboratory stool testing workflow.IMPORTANCEClostridioides difficile infection ranges from diarrhea to severe, life-threatening pseudomembranous colitis. Clinical criteria include three or more liquid stools in 24 h, while diagnostic testing includes nucleic acid tests alone or in combination with an enzyme immunoassay for C. difficile antigen and toxin. This study evaluates the analytical performance of C. difficile detection from clinical specimens using the QIAstat-Dx multiplex gastrointestinal panel compared with four commercial assays (Cepheid Xpert C. difficile, BD MAX Cdiff, Verigene CDF assays, and BioFire GI panel) and a C. difficile immunoassay. The BioFire GI panel had the highest positive percent agreement (90-100%), followed by the QIAstat-Dx (88-98%), BD MAX (87-98%), and the Xpert assays (86-96%). The QIAstat-Dx demonstrated high positive and negative agreement with all nucleic acid tests. The short assay setup time for the QIAstat-Dx GIP 2 also offers a streamlined testing workflow.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.