Stefanie Marxreiter, Jamie Marino, Katrina Callan, Judith Hargrave, Tricia Alston, Kathy Fauntleroy, Amy Robertson, Barry N Kreiswirth, Liang Chen, Mariana Castanheira, Matthew Hockin, Andrew C Hemmert, Amy Davis, Michael J Satlin, Lars F Westblade
{"title":"使用多重PCR系统直接从阳性血培养液中快速检测革兰氏阴性抗微生物药物耐药性决定因素。","authors":"Stefanie Marxreiter, Jamie Marino, Katrina Callan, Judith Hargrave, Tricia Alston, Kathy Fauntleroy, Amy Robertson, Barry N Kreiswirth, Liang Chen, Mariana Castanheira, Matthew Hockin, Andrew C Hemmert, Amy Davis, Michael J Satlin, Lars F Westblade","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00384-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently available rapid blood culture diagnostics detect few gram-negative resistance determinants, limiting their clinical utility. We prospectively evaluated the prototype BIOFIRE FILMARRAY Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Panel, a rapid multiplex PCR test that detects 31 AMR genes, on residual positive blood culture broths from patients with gram-negative bacteremia due to five target organisms at a New York City hospital. Predicted antimicrobial resistance based on the AMR Panel was compared to results from broth microdilution testing of bloodstream isolates recovered in culture. A simulated stewardship study assessed opportunities for the optimization of therapy if the AMR Panel results had been available for patient care in real time. We enrolled 148 patients with gram-negative bacteremia (<i>Escherichia coli, n</i> = 75; <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae, n</i> = 44; <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa, n</i> = 17; <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i> complex<i>, n</i> = 9; and <i>Acinetobacter baumannii, n</i> = 3). The sensitivity of the AMR Panel for predicting antimicrobial resistance was ≥90% for 10/14 antimicrobial agents in <i>E. coli</i> and for 10/16 agents in <i>K. pneumoniae</i>. Specificity was ≥90% for 15/17 agents in <i>E. coli</i> and for all 16 agents in <i>K. pneumoniae</i>. Performance for other organisms was poor. For <i>E. coli</i> or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> bacteremia, use of the AMR Panel could have led to earlier escalation or de-escalation of β-lactam therapy in a majority of patients compared to what actually occurred. This study demonstrates that a rapid multiplex PCR test with a large menu of AMR genes can be applied to positive blood culture broths to rapidly predict resistance to frontline antimicrobial agents in patients with <i>E. coli</i> or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> bacteremia.IMPORTANCEPatients with gram-negative bacteremia require urgent treatment with antimicrobial agents that are effective against their infecting pathogen. However, conventional laboratory work-up of blood cultures takes days to yield results, and during this time, patients may receive ineffective therapies. We evaluated the prototype BIOFIRE FILMARRAY AMR Panel, an assay that detects 31 genes in gram-negative bacteria that confer resistance to β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides in approximately 1 hour, directly from positive blood culture broths, and compared these results to antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates recovered in culture. We found that the AMR Panel accurately predicted resistance in <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> to most antimicrobials. Moreover, if results from this assay had been used for patient care, there would have been opportunities to optimize antimicrobial prescribing more quickly than using conventional methods. These data demonstrate how novel molecular assays could optimize care for patients with <i>E. coli</i> and <i>K. pneumoniae</i> bacteremia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0038425"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid detection of gram-negative antimicrobial resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths using a multiplex PCR system.\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Marxreiter, Jamie Marino, Katrina Callan, Judith Hargrave, Tricia Alston, Kathy Fauntleroy, Amy Robertson, Barry N Kreiswirth, Liang Chen, Mariana Castanheira, Matthew Hockin, Andrew C Hemmert, Amy Davis, Michael J Satlin, Lars F Westblade\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jcm.00384-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Currently available rapid blood culture diagnostics detect few gram-negative resistance determinants, limiting their clinical utility. We prospectively evaluated the prototype BIOFIRE FILMARRAY Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Panel, a rapid multiplex PCR test that detects 31 AMR genes, on residual positive blood culture broths from patients with gram-negative bacteremia due to five target organisms at a New York City hospital. Predicted antimicrobial resistance based on the AMR Panel was compared to results from broth microdilution testing of bloodstream isolates recovered in culture. A simulated stewardship study assessed opportunities for the optimization of therapy if the AMR Panel results had been available for patient care in real time. We enrolled 148 patients with gram-negative bacteremia (<i>Escherichia coli, n</i> = 75; <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae, n</i> = 44; <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa, n</i> = 17; <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i> complex<i>, n</i> = 9; and <i>Acinetobacter baumannii, n</i> = 3). The sensitivity of the AMR Panel for predicting antimicrobial resistance was ≥90% for 10/14 antimicrobial agents in <i>E. coli</i> and for 10/16 agents in <i>K. pneumoniae</i>. Specificity was ≥90% for 15/17 agents in <i>E. coli</i> and for all 16 agents in <i>K. pneumoniae</i>. Performance for other organisms was poor. For <i>E. coli</i> or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> bacteremia, use of the AMR Panel could have led to earlier escalation or de-escalation of β-lactam therapy in a majority of patients compared to what actually occurred. This study demonstrates that a rapid multiplex PCR test with a large menu of AMR genes can be applied to positive blood culture broths to rapidly predict resistance to frontline antimicrobial agents in patients with <i>E. coli</i> or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> bacteremia.IMPORTANCEPatients with gram-negative bacteremia require urgent treatment with antimicrobial agents that are effective against their infecting pathogen. However, conventional laboratory work-up of blood cultures takes days to yield results, and during this time, patients may receive ineffective therapies. We evaluated the prototype BIOFIRE FILMARRAY AMR Panel, an assay that detects 31 genes in gram-negative bacteria that confer resistance to β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides in approximately 1 hour, directly from positive blood culture broths, and compared these results to antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates recovered in culture. We found that the AMR Panel accurately predicted resistance in <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> to most antimicrobials. Moreover, if results from this assay had been used for patient care, there would have been opportunities to optimize antimicrobial prescribing more quickly than using conventional methods. These data demonstrate how novel molecular assays could optimize care for patients with <i>E. coli</i> and <i>K. pneumoniae</i> bacteremia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0038425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00384-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00384-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目前可用的快速血培养诊断检测很少革兰氏阴性耐药决定因素,限制了其临床应用。我们前瞻性地评估了原型BIOFIRE FILMARRAY抗菌素耐药性(AMR)小组,这是一种快速多重PCR检测,可检测31个AMR基因,用于纽约市一家医院的革兰氏阴性菌血症患者的残留阳性血培养液。将基于AMR Panel的预测抗菌素耐药性与培养中回收的血液分离株的肉汤微量稀释试验结果进行比较。一项模拟管理研究评估了如果AMR小组的结果可实时用于患者护理,则优化治疗的机会。我们纳入了148例革兰氏阴性菌血症患者(大肠杆菌75例;肺炎克雷伯菌44例;铜绿假单胞菌17例;阴沟肠杆菌复合菌9例;鲍曼不动杆菌3例)。AMR Panel预测大肠杆菌中10/14种抗菌药物和肺炎克雷伯菌中10/16种抗菌药物耐药性的敏感性≥90%。大肠杆菌中15/17种药物和肺炎克雷伯菌中16种药物的特异性均≥90%。其他生物的表现很差。对于大肠杆菌或肺炎克雷伯菌血症,与实际发生的情况相比,使用AMR小组可能导致大多数患者更早地增加或减少β-内酰胺治疗。本研究表明,含有大量AMR基因的快速多重PCR检测可应用于阳性血培养菌液,快速预测大肠杆菌或肺炎克雷伯菌血症患者对一线抗菌药物的耐药性。重要意义:革兰氏阴性菌血症患者需要紧急使用抗菌药物治疗,以有效对抗其感染病原体。然而,传统的血液培养实验室检查需要几天才能得出结果,在此期间,患者可能接受无效的治疗。我们评估了原型BIOFIRE FILMARRAY AMR Panel,这是一种检测革兰氏阴性细菌中31个基因的方法,这些基因对β-内酰胺类、氟喹诺酮类和氨基糖苷类具有耐药性,直接从阳性血培养液中检测大约1小时,并将这些结果与培养中恢复的分离菌的抗菌敏感性测试进行比较。我们发现抗菌素耐药性小组准确地预测了大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌对大多数抗菌素的耐药性。此外,如果该检测结果用于患者护理,将有机会比使用传统方法更快地优化抗菌药物处方。这些数据表明,新型分子检测方法可以优化大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌血症患者的护理。
Rapid detection of gram-negative antimicrobial resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths using a multiplex PCR system.
Currently available rapid blood culture diagnostics detect few gram-negative resistance determinants, limiting their clinical utility. We prospectively evaluated the prototype BIOFIRE FILMARRAY Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Panel, a rapid multiplex PCR test that detects 31 AMR genes, on residual positive blood culture broths from patients with gram-negative bacteremia due to five target organisms at a New York City hospital. Predicted antimicrobial resistance based on the AMR Panel was compared to results from broth microdilution testing of bloodstream isolates recovered in culture. A simulated stewardship study assessed opportunities for the optimization of therapy if the AMR Panel results had been available for patient care in real time. We enrolled 148 patients with gram-negative bacteremia (Escherichia coli, n = 75; Klebsiella pneumoniae, n = 44; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, n = 17; Enterobacter cloacae complex, n = 9; and Acinetobacter baumannii, n = 3). The sensitivity of the AMR Panel for predicting antimicrobial resistance was ≥90% for 10/14 antimicrobial agents in E. coli and for 10/16 agents in K. pneumoniae. Specificity was ≥90% for 15/17 agents in E. coli and for all 16 agents in K. pneumoniae. Performance for other organisms was poor. For E. coli or K. pneumoniae bacteremia, use of the AMR Panel could have led to earlier escalation or de-escalation of β-lactam therapy in a majority of patients compared to what actually occurred. This study demonstrates that a rapid multiplex PCR test with a large menu of AMR genes can be applied to positive blood culture broths to rapidly predict resistance to frontline antimicrobial agents in patients with E. coli or K. pneumoniae bacteremia.IMPORTANCEPatients with gram-negative bacteremia require urgent treatment with antimicrobial agents that are effective against their infecting pathogen. However, conventional laboratory work-up of blood cultures takes days to yield results, and during this time, patients may receive ineffective therapies. We evaluated the prototype BIOFIRE FILMARRAY AMR Panel, an assay that detects 31 genes in gram-negative bacteria that confer resistance to β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides in approximately 1 hour, directly from positive blood culture broths, and compared these results to antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates recovered in culture. We found that the AMR Panel accurately predicted resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to most antimicrobials. Moreover, if results from this assay had been used for patient care, there would have been opportunities to optimize antimicrobial prescribing more quickly than using conventional methods. These data demonstrate how novel molecular assays could optimize care for patients with E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacteremia.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.