钢铁与优雅:塑造印度整形外科的女性。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-09-16 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-025-01560-w
Sanika Rapole, Nandhini Iyer, Binoti Sheth
{"title":"钢铁与优雅:塑造印度整形外科的女性。","authors":"Sanika Rapole, Nandhini Iyer, Binoti Sheth","doi":"10.1007/s43465-025-01560-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopedic surgery remains one of the least diverse medical specialties, historically framed as physically demanding and exclusionary. In India, despite near-parity in medical school enrolments, representation in orthopedics is disproportionately low compared to global averages. Structural barriers-including stereotypes, inequitable training pathways, and limited mentorship-have influenced workforce composition. However, evolving definitions of surgical competence, advances in technology, and advocacy initiatives have begun reshaping the specialty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, supplemented by official resources (IOA, IODA), institutional archives, and Royal College records. Eligible material included workforce audits, descriptive studies, and official reports. Purposeful sampling identified key pioneers and leaders in Indian orthopedics, with contributions verified through publications, biographies, and archival sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Historical barriers limited entry and progression within orthopedics, reinforcing perceptions of physicality over precision. Notable pioneers established new benchmarks in pediatric orthopedics, hand surgery, scoliosis care, limb reconstruction, and arthroplasty. The establishment of WOICE in 2016 provided a platform for mentorship, advocacy, and leadership development. Despite progress, underrepresentation persists in subspecialties such as spine and arthroplasty, alongside systemic challenges including limited institutional support and inconsistent mentorship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evolution of orthopedics in India highlights gradual but meaningful change. Continued progress requires structural reforms in training, equitable leadership opportunities, and inclusive professional policies. Advancing diversity is not only a matter of equity but also central to clinical excellence and improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 10","pages":"1599-1608"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12535550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steel and Grace: The Women Who Shaped Indian Orthopedic Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Sanika Rapole, Nandhini Iyer, Binoti Sheth\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-025-01560-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopedic surgery remains one of the least diverse medical specialties, historically framed as physically demanding and exclusionary. In India, despite near-parity in medical school enrolments, representation in orthopedics is disproportionately low compared to global averages. Structural barriers-including stereotypes, inequitable training pathways, and limited mentorship-have influenced workforce composition. However, evolving definitions of surgical competence, advances in technology, and advocacy initiatives have begun reshaping the specialty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, supplemented by official resources (IOA, IODA), institutional archives, and Royal College records. Eligible material included workforce audits, descriptive studies, and official reports. Purposeful sampling identified key pioneers and leaders in Indian orthopedics, with contributions verified through publications, biographies, and archival sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Historical barriers limited entry and progression within orthopedics, reinforcing perceptions of physicality over precision. Notable pioneers established new benchmarks in pediatric orthopedics, hand surgery, scoliosis care, limb reconstruction, and arthroplasty. The establishment of WOICE in 2016 provided a platform for mentorship, advocacy, and leadership development. Despite progress, underrepresentation persists in subspecialties such as spine and arthroplasty, alongside systemic challenges including limited institutional support and inconsistent mentorship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evolution of orthopedics in India highlights gradual but meaningful change. Continued progress requires structural reforms in training, equitable leadership opportunities, and inclusive professional policies. Advancing diversity is not only a matter of equity but also central to clinical excellence and improved patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"59 10\",\"pages\":\"1599-1608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12535550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01560-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01560-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨科手术仍然是最不多样化的医学专业之一,历史上被认为是对身体的要求和排斥。在印度,尽管医学院入学人数接近均等,但与全球平均水平相比,骨科专业的比例低得不成比例。结构性障碍——包括刻板印象、不公平的培训途径和有限的指导——影响了劳动力构成。然而,不断发展的外科能力定义、技术的进步和倡导活动已经开始重塑该专业。方法:采用PubMed、Scopus、谷歌Scholar等文献资料,辅以官方资源(IOA、IODA)、机构档案和皇家学院档案,进行文献综述。合格的材料包括劳动力审计、描述性研究和官方报告。有目的的抽样确定了印度骨科的主要先驱和领导者,并通过出版物、传记和档案来源验证了他们的贡献。结果:历史障碍限制了骨科的进入和发展,加强了对物理精度的认识。著名的先行者在儿童骨科、手外科、脊柱侧凸护理、肢体重建和关节置换术方面建立了新的基准。2016年成立的voice为指导、倡导和领导力发展提供了一个平台。尽管取得了进展,但在脊柱和关节成形术等亚专科中,代表性仍然不足,同时还面临着包括有限的机构支持和不一致的指导在内的系统性挑战。结论:印度骨科的发展呈现渐进而有意义的变化。继续取得进展需要在培训、公平的领导机会和包容性专业政策方面进行结构性改革。推进多样性不仅是公平的问题,也是临床卓越和改善患者预后的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Steel and Grace: The Women Who Shaped Indian Orthopedic Surgery.

Background: Orthopedic surgery remains one of the least diverse medical specialties, historically framed as physically demanding and exclusionary. In India, despite near-parity in medical school enrolments, representation in orthopedics is disproportionately low compared to global averages. Structural barriers-including stereotypes, inequitable training pathways, and limited mentorship-have influenced workforce composition. However, evolving definitions of surgical competence, advances in technology, and advocacy initiatives have begun reshaping the specialty.

Methods: A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, supplemented by official resources (IOA, IODA), institutional archives, and Royal College records. Eligible material included workforce audits, descriptive studies, and official reports. Purposeful sampling identified key pioneers and leaders in Indian orthopedics, with contributions verified through publications, biographies, and archival sources.

Results: Historical barriers limited entry and progression within orthopedics, reinforcing perceptions of physicality over precision. Notable pioneers established new benchmarks in pediatric orthopedics, hand surgery, scoliosis care, limb reconstruction, and arthroplasty. The establishment of WOICE in 2016 provided a platform for mentorship, advocacy, and leadership development. Despite progress, underrepresentation persists in subspecialties such as spine and arthroplasty, alongside systemic challenges including limited institutional support and inconsistent mentorship.

Conclusion: The evolution of orthopedics in India highlights gradual but meaningful change. Continued progress requires structural reforms in training, equitable leadership opportunities, and inclusive professional policies. Advancing diversity is not only a matter of equity but also central to clinical excellence and improved patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信