Ali Mozaffari Mansourabad, Hossein Samiei-Abianeh, Yousof Tarverdizadeh, Seyed Mojtaba Aghaie, Abbas Hajizade
{"title":"固相合成免疫扇在BALB/c小鼠中使用嵌合蛋白候选疫苗对大肠杆菌O157:H7提供临床相关保护","authors":"Ali Mozaffari Mansourabad, Hossein Samiei-Abianeh, Yousof Tarverdizadeh, Seyed Mojtaba Aghaie, Abbas Hajizade","doi":"10.2174/0113892037405052250926104854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p> Introduction/Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Imunofan, a synthetic peptide adjuvant, compared to Freund's adjuvant. We hypothesized that imunofan would enhance protective immunity while avoiding the adverse effects associated with traditional adjuvants. </p><p> Methods: Imunofan (836 Da) was synthesized via SPPS, purified by RP-HPLC, and validated by LC-MS. A chimeric antigen (ESI) encoding EspA, StxB, and Intimin was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) using the pET28-ESI plasmid, induced with IPTG, and purified via Ni-NTA chromatography. BALB/c mice (n = 10/group) were immunized with: (1) ESI+Imunofan, (2) ESI+Freund's adjuvant, (3) ESI alone, or (4) Imunofan alone. IgG titers were measured by ELISA, and protection was assessed via bacterial shedding (log10 CFU/g feces) post-challenge with E. coli O157:H7. </p><p> Results: ESI+Freund's adjuvant elicited the highest IgG response (mean ± SEM: 12.3 ± 0.8 log10; p < 0.05 vs. ESI alone). Surprisingly, ESI+Imunofan showed a comparable reduction in bacterial shedding (3.1 ± 0.4 log10 CFU/g vs. Freund's adjuvant: 2.9 ± 0.3; p > 0.1), despite lower IgG (9.1 ± 0.6 log10). ESI alone reduced shedding (4.2 ± 0.5 log10; p < 0.01 vs. control), outperforming Imunofan alone (5.8 ± 0.7; p < 0.05). </p><p> Conclusion: Imunofan's structural authenticity and functional efficacy were demonstrated. Its comparable protection to Freund's adjuvant, despite weaker humoral responses, suggests a unique role in modulating non-antibody-mediated immunity. These findings support imunofan as a safer alternative to conventional adjuvants.</p>","PeriodicalId":10859,"journal":{"name":"Current protein & peptide science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solid-Phase Synthesized Imunofan Confers Clinically Relevant Protection using a Chimeric Protein Vaccine Candidate Against E. coli O157:H7 in BALB/c Mice.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Mozaffari Mansourabad, Hossein Samiei-Abianeh, Yousof Tarverdizadeh, Seyed Mojtaba Aghaie, Abbas Hajizade\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0113892037405052250926104854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><p> Introduction/Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Imunofan, a synthetic peptide adjuvant, compared to Freund's adjuvant. We hypothesized that imunofan would enhance protective immunity while avoiding the adverse effects associated with traditional adjuvants. </p><p> Methods: Imunofan (836 Da) was synthesized via SPPS, purified by RP-HPLC, and validated by LC-MS. A chimeric antigen (ESI) encoding EspA, StxB, and Intimin was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) using the pET28-ESI plasmid, induced with IPTG, and purified via Ni-NTA chromatography. BALB/c mice (n = 10/group) were immunized with: (1) ESI+Imunofan, (2) ESI+Freund's adjuvant, (3) ESI alone, or (4) Imunofan alone. IgG titers were measured by ELISA, and protection was assessed via bacterial shedding (log10 CFU/g feces) post-challenge with E. coli O157:H7. </p><p> Results: ESI+Freund's adjuvant elicited the highest IgG response (mean ± SEM: 12.3 ± 0.8 log10; p < 0.05 vs. ESI alone). Surprisingly, ESI+Imunofan showed a comparable reduction in bacterial shedding (3.1 ± 0.4 log10 CFU/g vs. Freund's adjuvant: 2.9 ± 0.3; p > 0.1), despite lower IgG (9.1 ± 0.6 log10). ESI alone reduced shedding (4.2 ± 0.5 log10; p < 0.01 vs. control), outperforming Imunofan alone (5.8 ± 0.7; p < 0.05). </p><p> Conclusion: Imunofan's structural authenticity and functional efficacy were demonstrated. Its comparable protection to Freund's adjuvant, despite weaker humoral responses, suggests a unique role in modulating non-antibody-mediated immunity. These findings support imunofan as a safer alternative to conventional adjuvants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current protein & peptide science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current protein & peptide science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892037405052250926104854\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current protein & peptide science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892037405052250926104854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Solid-Phase Synthesized Imunofan Confers Clinically Relevant Protection using a Chimeric Protein Vaccine Candidate Against E. coli O157:H7 in BALB/c Mice.
Introduction/Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Imunofan, a synthetic peptide adjuvant, compared to Freund's adjuvant. We hypothesized that imunofan would enhance protective immunity while avoiding the adverse effects associated with traditional adjuvants.
Methods: Imunofan (836 Da) was synthesized via SPPS, purified by RP-HPLC, and validated by LC-MS. A chimeric antigen (ESI) encoding EspA, StxB, and Intimin was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) using the pET28-ESI plasmid, induced with IPTG, and purified via Ni-NTA chromatography. BALB/c mice (n = 10/group) were immunized with: (1) ESI+Imunofan, (2) ESI+Freund's adjuvant, (3) ESI alone, or (4) Imunofan alone. IgG titers were measured by ELISA, and protection was assessed via bacterial shedding (log10 CFU/g feces) post-challenge with E. coli O157:H7.
Results: ESI+Freund's adjuvant elicited the highest IgG response (mean ± SEM: 12.3 ± 0.8 log10; p < 0.05 vs. ESI alone). Surprisingly, ESI+Imunofan showed a comparable reduction in bacterial shedding (3.1 ± 0.4 log10 CFU/g vs. Freund's adjuvant: 2.9 ± 0.3; p > 0.1), despite lower IgG (9.1 ± 0.6 log10). ESI alone reduced shedding (4.2 ± 0.5 log10; p < 0.01 vs. control), outperforming Imunofan alone (5.8 ± 0.7; p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Imunofan's structural authenticity and functional efficacy were demonstrated. Its comparable protection to Freund's adjuvant, despite weaker humoral responses, suggests a unique role in modulating non-antibody-mediated immunity. These findings support imunofan as a safer alternative to conventional adjuvants.
期刊介绍:
Current Protein & Peptide Science publishes full-length/mini review articles on specific aspects involving proteins, peptides, and interactions between the enzymes, the binding interactions of hormones and their receptors; the properties of transcription factors and other molecules that regulate gene expression; the reactions leading to the immune response; the process of signal transduction; the structure and function of proteins involved in the cytoskeleton and molecular motors; the properties of membrane channels and transporters; and the generation and storage of metabolic energy. In addition, reviews of experimental studies of protein folding and design are given special emphasis. Manuscripts submitted to Current Protein and Peptide Science should cover a field by discussing research from the leading laboratories in a field and should pose questions for future studies. Original papers, research articles and letter articles/short communications are not considered for publication in Current Protein & Peptide Science.