固相合成免疫扇在BALB/c小鼠中使用嵌合蛋白候选疫苗对大肠杆菌O157:H7提供临床相关保护

IF 2 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Ali Mozaffari Mansourabad, Hossein Samiei-Abianeh, Yousof Tarverdizadeh, Seyed Mojtaba Aghaie, Abbas Hajizade
{"title":"固相合成免疫扇在BALB/c小鼠中使用嵌合蛋白候选疫苗对大肠杆菌O157:H7提供临床相关保护","authors":"Ali Mozaffari Mansourabad, Hossein Samiei-Abianeh, Yousof Tarverdizadeh, Seyed Mojtaba Aghaie, Abbas Hajizade","doi":"10.2174/0113892037405052250926104854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p> Introduction/Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Imunofan, a synthetic peptide adjuvant, compared to Freund's adjuvant. We hypothesized that imunofan would enhance protective immunity while avoiding the adverse effects associated with traditional adjuvants. </p><p> Methods: Imunofan (836 Da) was synthesized via SPPS, purified by RP-HPLC, and validated by LC-MS. A chimeric antigen (ESI) encoding EspA, StxB, and Intimin was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) using the pET28-ESI plasmid, induced with IPTG, and purified via Ni-NTA chromatography. BALB/c mice (n = 10/group) were immunized with: (1) ESI+Imunofan, (2) ESI+Freund's adjuvant, (3) ESI alone, or (4) Imunofan alone. IgG titers were measured by ELISA, and protection was assessed via bacterial shedding (log10 CFU/g feces) post-challenge with E. coli O157:H7. </p><p> Results: ESI+Freund's adjuvant elicited the highest IgG response (mean ± SEM: 12.3 ± 0.8 log10; p < 0.05 vs. ESI alone). Surprisingly, ESI+Imunofan showed a comparable reduction in bacterial shedding (3.1 ± 0.4 log10 CFU/g vs. Freund's adjuvant: 2.9 ± 0.3; p > 0.1), despite lower IgG (9.1 ± 0.6 log10). ESI alone reduced shedding (4.2 ± 0.5 log10; p < 0.01 vs. control), outperforming Imunofan alone (5.8 ± 0.7; p < 0.05). </p><p> Conclusion: Imunofan's structural authenticity and functional efficacy were demonstrated. Its comparable protection to Freund's adjuvant, despite weaker humoral responses, suggests a unique role in modulating non-antibody-mediated immunity. These findings support imunofan as a safer alternative to conventional adjuvants.</p>","PeriodicalId":10859,"journal":{"name":"Current protein & peptide science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solid-Phase Synthesized Imunofan Confers Clinically Relevant Protection using a Chimeric Protein Vaccine Candidate Against E. coli O157:H7 in BALB/c Mice.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Mozaffari Mansourabad, Hossein Samiei-Abianeh, Yousof Tarverdizadeh, Seyed Mojtaba Aghaie, Abbas Hajizade\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0113892037405052250926104854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><p> Introduction/Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Imunofan, a synthetic peptide adjuvant, compared to Freund's adjuvant. We hypothesized that imunofan would enhance protective immunity while avoiding the adverse effects associated with traditional adjuvants. </p><p> Methods: Imunofan (836 Da) was synthesized via SPPS, purified by RP-HPLC, and validated by LC-MS. A chimeric antigen (ESI) encoding EspA, StxB, and Intimin was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) using the pET28-ESI plasmid, induced with IPTG, and purified via Ni-NTA chromatography. BALB/c mice (n = 10/group) were immunized with: (1) ESI+Imunofan, (2) ESI+Freund's adjuvant, (3) ESI alone, or (4) Imunofan alone. IgG titers were measured by ELISA, and protection was assessed via bacterial shedding (log10 CFU/g feces) post-challenge with E. coli O157:H7. </p><p> Results: ESI+Freund's adjuvant elicited the highest IgG response (mean ± SEM: 12.3 ± 0.8 log10; p < 0.05 vs. ESI alone). Surprisingly, ESI+Imunofan showed a comparable reduction in bacterial shedding (3.1 ± 0.4 log10 CFU/g vs. Freund's adjuvant: 2.9 ± 0.3; p > 0.1), despite lower IgG (9.1 ± 0.6 log10). ESI alone reduced shedding (4.2 ± 0.5 log10; p < 0.01 vs. control), outperforming Imunofan alone (5.8 ± 0.7; p < 0.05). </p><p> Conclusion: Imunofan's structural authenticity and functional efficacy were demonstrated. Its comparable protection to Freund's adjuvant, despite weaker humoral responses, suggests a unique role in modulating non-antibody-mediated immunity. These findings support imunofan as a safer alternative to conventional adjuvants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current protein & peptide science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current protein & peptide science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892037405052250926104854\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current protein & peptide science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892037405052250926104854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言/目的:本研究旨在评价合成肽佐剂免疫凡与弗氏佐剂的疗效。我们假设免疫扇可以增强保护性免疫,同时避免与传统佐剂相关的副作用。方法:采用SPPS法合成免疫凡(836 Da),反相高效液相色谱法纯化,液相色谱-质谱法验证。利用pET28-ESI质粒在大肠杆菌BL21(DE3)中表达了一种编码EspA、StxB和Intimin的嵌合抗原(ESI), IPTG诱导,Ni-NTA层析纯化。BALB/c小鼠(n = 10/组)分别接种:(1)ESI+Imunofan, (2) ESI+Freund佐剂,(3)ESI单用,(4)Imunofan单用。ELISA法检测IgG滴度,并通过大肠杆菌O157:H7攻毒后的细菌脱落(log10 CFU/g粪便)评估保护作用。结果:ESI+Freund佐剂诱导的IgG应答最高(平均±SEM: 12.3±0.8 log10, p < 0.05)。令人惊讶的是,ESI+Imunofan显示出相当的细菌脱落减少(3.1±0.4 log10 CFU/g,而Freund佐剂:2.9±0.3;p > 0.1),尽管IgG降低(9.1±0.6 log10)。ESI单用降低了脱落(4.2±0.5 log10, p < 0.01),优于Imunofan单用(5.8±0.7,p < 0.05)。结论:证实了免疫扇的结构真实性和功能有效性。尽管体液反应较弱,但它的保护作用与弗氏佐剂相当,这表明它在调节非抗体介导的免疫方面具有独特的作用。这些发现支持免疫扇作为一种比传统佐剂更安全的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Solid-Phase Synthesized Imunofan Confers Clinically Relevant Protection using a Chimeric Protein Vaccine Candidate Against E. coli O157:H7 in BALB/c Mice.

Introduction/Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Imunofan, a synthetic peptide adjuvant, compared to Freund's adjuvant. We hypothesized that imunofan would enhance protective immunity while avoiding the adverse effects associated with traditional adjuvants.

Methods: Imunofan (836 Da) was synthesized via SPPS, purified by RP-HPLC, and validated by LC-MS. A chimeric antigen (ESI) encoding EspA, StxB, and Intimin was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) using the pET28-ESI plasmid, induced with IPTG, and purified via Ni-NTA chromatography. BALB/c mice (n = 10/group) were immunized with: (1) ESI+Imunofan, (2) ESI+Freund's adjuvant, (3) ESI alone, or (4) Imunofan alone. IgG titers were measured by ELISA, and protection was assessed via bacterial shedding (log10 CFU/g feces) post-challenge with E. coli O157:H7.

Results: ESI+Freund's adjuvant elicited the highest IgG response (mean ± SEM: 12.3 ± 0.8 log10; p < 0.05 vs. ESI alone). Surprisingly, ESI+Imunofan showed a comparable reduction in bacterial shedding (3.1 ± 0.4 log10 CFU/g vs. Freund's adjuvant: 2.9 ± 0.3; p > 0.1), despite lower IgG (9.1 ± 0.6 log10). ESI alone reduced shedding (4.2 ± 0.5 log10; p < 0.01 vs. control), outperforming Imunofan alone (5.8 ± 0.7; p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Imunofan's structural authenticity and functional efficacy were demonstrated. Its comparable protection to Freund's adjuvant, despite weaker humoral responses, suggests a unique role in modulating non-antibody-mediated immunity. These findings support imunofan as a safer alternative to conventional adjuvants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current protein & peptide science
Current protein & peptide science 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Current Protein & Peptide Science publishes full-length/mini review articles on specific aspects involving proteins, peptides, and interactions between the enzymes, the binding interactions of hormones and their receptors; the properties of transcription factors and other molecules that regulate gene expression; the reactions leading to the immune response; the process of signal transduction; the structure and function of proteins involved in the cytoskeleton and molecular motors; the properties of membrane channels and transporters; and the generation and storage of metabolic energy. In addition, reviews of experimental studies of protein folding and design are given special emphasis. Manuscripts submitted to Current Protein and Peptide Science should cover a field by discussing research from the leading laboratories in a field and should pose questions for future studies. Original papers, research articles and letter articles/short communications are not considered for publication in Current Protein & Peptide Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信