了解埃塞俄比亚贡达尔妇女对长效可逆避孕药具的偏好:一个离散选择实验。

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Ousman Ambaw, Amare Minyhun, Tsegaw Amare Baykeda, Haimanot Wubale Tewabe, Endalew Minwuye Andargie, Yihalem Abebe Belay, Dessie Tarko Ambaw, Lei Si
{"title":"了解埃塞俄比亚贡达尔妇女对长效可逆避孕药具的偏好:一个离散选择实验。","authors":"Ousman Ambaw, Amare Minyhun, Tsegaw Amare Baykeda, Haimanot Wubale Tewabe, Endalew Minwuye Andargie, Yihalem Abebe Belay, Dessie Tarko Ambaw, Lei Si","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00683-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Ethiopia, limited use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) contributes to unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and preventable maternal deaths. Despite their proven effectiveness, LARCs remain underutilized. Evidence on women's preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) is scarce. This study examined women's stated preferences, WTP, and trade-offs regarding LARC use in Gondar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 344 contraceptive users, generating 8,256 observations. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) with 24 choice tasks, divided into two blocks, was employed. Each task presented two unlabeled alternatives defined by six key attributes, identified through literature review and expert consultation. Data were analyzed using mixed logit models to estimate preference strength and WTP based on model coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that provider type significantly influenced women's preferences. Women showed the highest WTP for LARCs provided by midwives [528 ETB (10.15 USD)], compared to services offered by doctors [285 ETB (5.48 USD)] and health officers [215 ETB (4.13 USD)]. Preferences were also shaped by side-effect profiles: methods associated with slight weight gain [155 ETB (2.98 USD)], high effectiveness [80 ETB (1.54 USD)], and absence of bleeding [74 ETB (1.43 USD)] were positively valued. Conversely, heavy menstrual bleeding led to the largest reduction in WTP [-688 ETB (-13.24 USD)], indicating a significant barrier to LARC uptake. Longer-acting methods also reduced WTP [-139 ETB (-2.68 USD)], possibly reflecting concerns about long-term commitment or side effects. Cost sensitivity was evident, as increases of 100 ETB (1.92 USD) or 500 ETB (9.92 USD) further reduced uptake likelihood.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women's preferences for LARCs are influenced by provider type, side effects, and cost. Enhancing LARC services by prioritizing midwife-led delivery, addressing side effects such as heavy menstrual bleeding, and considering women's WTP can increase uptake. These findings highlight the need for affordable, user-centered contraceptive services in Ethiopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12538984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding women's preferences for long-acting reversible contraceptives in Gondar, Ethiopia: a discrete choice experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Ousman Ambaw, Amare Minyhun, Tsegaw Amare Baykeda, Haimanot Wubale Tewabe, Endalew Minwuye Andargie, Yihalem Abebe Belay, Dessie Tarko Ambaw, Lei Si\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13561-025-00683-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Ethiopia, limited use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) contributes to unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and preventable maternal deaths. Despite their proven effectiveness, LARCs remain underutilized. Evidence on women's preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) is scarce. This study examined women's stated preferences, WTP, and trade-offs regarding LARC use in Gondar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 344 contraceptive users, generating 8,256 observations. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) with 24 choice tasks, divided into two blocks, was employed. Each task presented two unlabeled alternatives defined by six key attributes, identified through literature review and expert consultation. Data were analyzed using mixed logit models to estimate preference strength and WTP based on model coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that provider type significantly influenced women's preferences. Women showed the highest WTP for LARCs provided by midwives [528 ETB (10.15 USD)], compared to services offered by doctors [285 ETB (5.48 USD)] and health officers [215 ETB (4.13 USD)]. Preferences were also shaped by side-effect profiles: methods associated with slight weight gain [155 ETB (2.98 USD)], high effectiveness [80 ETB (1.54 USD)], and absence of bleeding [74 ETB (1.43 USD)] were positively valued. Conversely, heavy menstrual bleeding led to the largest reduction in WTP [-688 ETB (-13.24 USD)], indicating a significant barrier to LARC uptake. Longer-acting methods also reduced WTP [-139 ETB (-2.68 USD)], possibly reflecting concerns about long-term commitment or side effects. Cost sensitivity was evident, as increases of 100 ETB (1.92 USD) or 500 ETB (9.92 USD) further reduced uptake likelihood.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women's preferences for LARCs are influenced by provider type, side effects, and cost. Enhancing LARC services by prioritizing midwife-led delivery, addressing side effects such as heavy menstrual bleeding, and considering women's WTP can increase uptake. These findings highlight the need for affordable, user-centered contraceptive services in Ethiopia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12538984/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00683-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00683-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在埃塞俄比亚,有限使用长效可逆避孕药具(LARCs)导致意外怀孕、不安全堕胎和可预防的孕产妇死亡。尽管LARCs已被证明有效,但仍未得到充分利用。关于女性的偏好和支付意愿(WTP)的证据很少。本研究调查了女性在贡达尔语中使用LARC时的偏好、WTP和权衡。方法:以机构为基础的横断面研究对344名避孕使用者进行了调查,产生了8256个观察结果。采用离散选择实验(DCE),将24个选择任务分为两组。每个任务提供了两个未标记的替代方案,由六个关键属性定义,通过文献回顾和专家咨询确定。使用混合logit模型对数据进行分析,根据模型系数估计偏好强度和WTP。结果:分析显示,提供者类型显著影响女性的选择。与医生[285 ETB(5.48美元)]和卫生官员[215 ETB(4.13美元)]提供的服务相比,助产士提供的LARCs的妇女WTP最高[528 ETB(10.15美元)]。副作用也影响了患者的偏好:轻度体重增加[155 ETB(2.98美元)]、高效[80 ETB(1.54美元)]和无出血[74 ETB(1.43美元)]的方法受到积极评价。相反,大量月经出血导致WTP减少幅度最大[-688 ETB (-13.24 USD)],表明LARC摄取存在显著障碍。长效方法也降低了WTP [-139 ETB(-2.68美元)],可能反映了对长期承诺或副作用的担忧。成本敏感性很明显,因为增加100 ETB(1.92美元)或500 ETB(9.92美元)进一步降低了接受的可能性。结论:妇女对LARCs的选择受提供者类型、副作用和费用的影响。通过优先考虑助产士主导的分娩,解决月经大量出血等副作用,并考虑妇女WTP,加强LARC服务可以增加吸收。这些发现突出表明,埃塞俄比亚需要提供负担得起的、以用户为中心的避孕服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Understanding women's preferences for long-acting reversible contraceptives in Gondar, Ethiopia: a discrete choice experiment.

Understanding women's preferences for long-acting reversible contraceptives in Gondar, Ethiopia: a discrete choice experiment.

Understanding women's preferences for long-acting reversible contraceptives in Gondar, Ethiopia: a discrete choice experiment.

Background: In Ethiopia, limited use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) contributes to unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and preventable maternal deaths. Despite their proven effectiveness, LARCs remain underutilized. Evidence on women's preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) is scarce. This study examined women's stated preferences, WTP, and trade-offs regarding LARC use in Gondar.

Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 344 contraceptive users, generating 8,256 observations. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) with 24 choice tasks, divided into two blocks, was employed. Each task presented two unlabeled alternatives defined by six key attributes, identified through literature review and expert consultation. Data were analyzed using mixed logit models to estimate preference strength and WTP based on model coefficients.

Results: The analysis revealed that provider type significantly influenced women's preferences. Women showed the highest WTP for LARCs provided by midwives [528 ETB (10.15 USD)], compared to services offered by doctors [285 ETB (5.48 USD)] and health officers [215 ETB (4.13 USD)]. Preferences were also shaped by side-effect profiles: methods associated with slight weight gain [155 ETB (2.98 USD)], high effectiveness [80 ETB (1.54 USD)], and absence of bleeding [74 ETB (1.43 USD)] were positively valued. Conversely, heavy menstrual bleeding led to the largest reduction in WTP [-688 ETB (-13.24 USD)], indicating a significant barrier to LARC uptake. Longer-acting methods also reduced WTP [-139 ETB (-2.68 USD)], possibly reflecting concerns about long-term commitment or side effects. Cost sensitivity was evident, as increases of 100 ETB (1.92 USD) or 500 ETB (9.92 USD) further reduced uptake likelihood.

Conclusion: Women's preferences for LARCs are influenced by provider type, side effects, and cost. Enhancing LARC services by prioritizing midwife-led delivery, addressing side effects such as heavy menstrual bleeding, and considering women's WTP can increase uptake. These findings highlight the need for affordable, user-centered contraceptive services in Ethiopia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信