Xiaoli Xu, Xuan Zhao, Yi Ding, Xianglin Wu, Qiuyu Cao, Kan Wang, Yu Xiang, Siyu Wang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Min Xu, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Yuhong Chen, Jieli Lu, Yufang Bi, Mian Li, Yu Xu
{"title":"强化收缩压控制对有和无CKD患者肾脏预后的影响:SPRINT和ACCORD-BP试验的事后分析","authors":"Xiaoli Xu, Xuan Zhao, Yi Ding, Xianglin Wu, Qiuyu Cao, Kan Wang, Yu Xiang, Siyu Wang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Min Xu, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Yuhong Chen, Jieli Lu, Yufang Bi, Mian Li, Yu Xu","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of intensive blood pressure (BP) control on adverse kidney outcomes remain undetermined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This post hoc analysis included the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) participants and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure (ACCORD-BP) participants receiving standard glucose-lowering treatment and satisfying SPRINT eligibility criteria. The risks of kidney events between intensive (systolic BP < 120 mmHg) and standard (systolic BP < 140 mmHg) controls in participants with or without baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) were compared using Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,946 participants (2724 with CKD and 8222 without CKD) were included. During the intervention and post-intervention periods, the risk of renal failure was either reduced by intensive BP control in participants with CKD (HR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.22-0.97) or was not significantly different between intensive and standard BP control in participants without CKD (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.52-1.49; p<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.128). The risk of ≥ 30% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was increased and the risk of albuminuria was decreased by intensive BP control in participants with or without CKD. Intensive BP control increased the risk of CKD progression to moderate- or high-risk category, but not to very-high risk category according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) risk categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intensive BP control might increase the risk of mild CKD progression but not of more advanced CKD progression or renal failure compared with the standard BP control.</p>","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 10","pages":"e70162"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12538231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Kidney Outcomes in Patients With and Without CKD: A Post Hoc Analysis of SPRINT and ACCORD-BP Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoli Xu, Xuan Zhao, Yi Ding, Xianglin Wu, Qiuyu Cao, Kan Wang, Yu Xiang, Siyu Wang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Min Xu, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Yuhong Chen, Jieli Lu, Yufang Bi, Mian Li, Yu Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1753-0407.70162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of intensive blood pressure (BP) control on adverse kidney outcomes remain undetermined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This post hoc analysis included the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) participants and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure (ACCORD-BP) participants receiving standard glucose-lowering treatment and satisfying SPRINT eligibility criteria. The risks of kidney events between intensive (systolic BP < 120 mmHg) and standard (systolic BP < 140 mmHg) controls in participants with or without baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) were compared using Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,946 participants (2724 with CKD and 8222 without CKD) were included. During the intervention and post-intervention periods, the risk of renal failure was either reduced by intensive BP control in participants with CKD (HR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.22-0.97) or was not significantly different between intensive and standard BP control in participants without CKD (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.52-1.49; p<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.128). The risk of ≥ 30% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was increased and the risk of albuminuria was decreased by intensive BP control in participants with or without CKD. Intensive BP control increased the risk of CKD progression to moderate- or high-risk category, but not to very-high risk category according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) risk categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intensive BP control might increase the risk of mild CKD progression but not of more advanced CKD progression or renal failure compared with the standard BP control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"e70162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12538231/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70162\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:强化血压(BP)控制对肾脏不良结局的影响尚不确定。方法:本事后分析纳入收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)参与者和控制糖尿病心血管风险血压行动(ACCORD-BP)参与者,接受标准降糖治疗并满足SPRINT资格标准。结果:共纳入10,946名参与者(2724名CKD患者和8222名非CKD患者)。在干预期间和干预后,CKD患者强化血压控制可降低肾功能衰竭的风险(HR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.22-0.97),而非CKD患者强化血压控制与标准血压控制之间无显著差异(HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.52-1.49; p交互作用= 0.128)。在有或没有CKD的参与者中,通过强化血压控制,估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)降低≥30%的风险增加,蛋白尿的风险降低。根据肾脏疾病改善全球预后(KDIGO)风险分类,强化血压控制会增加CKD进展到中度或高风险类别的风险,但不会增加到非常高风险类别。结论:与标准血压控制相比,强化血压控制可能会增加轻度CKD进展的风险,但不会增加更晚期CKD进展或肾功能衰竭的风险。
Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Kidney Outcomes in Patients With and Without CKD: A Post Hoc Analysis of SPRINT and ACCORD-BP Trials.
Background: The effects of intensive blood pressure (BP) control on adverse kidney outcomes remain undetermined.
Methods: This post hoc analysis included the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) participants and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure (ACCORD-BP) participants receiving standard glucose-lowering treatment and satisfying SPRINT eligibility criteria. The risks of kidney events between intensive (systolic BP < 120 mmHg) and standard (systolic BP < 140 mmHg) controls in participants with or without baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) were compared using Cox proportional hazards models.
Results: A total of 10,946 participants (2724 with CKD and 8222 without CKD) were included. During the intervention and post-intervention periods, the risk of renal failure was either reduced by intensive BP control in participants with CKD (HR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.22-0.97) or was not significantly different between intensive and standard BP control in participants without CKD (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.52-1.49; pinteraction = 0.128). The risk of ≥ 30% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was increased and the risk of albuminuria was decreased by intensive BP control in participants with or without CKD. Intensive BP control increased the risk of CKD progression to moderate- or high-risk category, but not to very-high risk category according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) risk categories.
Conclusions: The intensive BP control might increase the risk of mild CKD progression but not of more advanced CKD progression or renal failure compared with the standard BP control.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Diabetes (JDB) devotes itself to diabetes research, therapeutics, and education. It aims to involve researchers and practitioners in a dialogue between East and West via all aspects of epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes, including the molecular, biochemical, and physiological aspects of diabetes. The Editorial team is international with a unique mix of Asian and Western participation.
The Editors welcome submissions in form of original research articles, images, novel case reports and correspondence, and will solicit reviews, point-counterpoint, commentaries, editorials, news highlights, and educational content.