汽车电气化对实际驾驶条件下制动磨损颗粒(BWP)排放的影响

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Wear Pub Date : 2025-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.wear.2025.206392
Sang-Hee Woo, Wooyoung Kim, Minki Kim, Hyoungjoon Jang, Seokhwan Lee
{"title":"汽车电气化对实际驾驶条件下制动磨损颗粒(BWP)排放的影响","authors":"Sang-Hee Woo,&nbsp;Wooyoung Kim,&nbsp;Minki Kim,&nbsp;Hyoungjoon Jang,&nbsp;Seokhwan Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.wear.2025.206392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Brake wear particle (BWP), a significant source of non-exhaust emissions, have gained increased regulatory attention with their inclusion in the Euro 7 standards. Regenerative braking in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and pure battery electric vehicles (PEVs) can reduce BWP emissions, but real-world validation of its effectiveness and of the UN GTR No. 24 <em>c</em>-factor estimation method remains limited. We aimed to assess real-world BWP emission factors of internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEVs), HEVs, and PEVs, and evaluate the predictive accuracy of UN GTR No. 24 <em>c</em>-factors. On-road measurements of BWP emissions and friction braking energy were conducted across urban, rural, and motorway routes. Emission estimates using UN GTR No. 24 <em>c</em>-factors were compared to measured values. HEVs and PEVs showed BWP emission reductions of 61–82 % and 96–98 %, respectively, compared to ICEVs. The lowest regenerative braking rates and the highest BWP emissions were observed in urban driving, where braking frequency was highest. Conversely, rural and motorway conditions showed lower friction braking energy and proportionally lower BWP emissions. The application of UN GTR No. 24 <em>c</em>-factors provided reasonable estimates but tended to overestimate BWP emissions in PEVs and HEVs. Regenerative braking significantly reduces BWP emissions, with real-world reductions closely linked to decreased friction braking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23970,"journal":{"name":"Wear","volume":"584 ","pages":"Article 206392"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of vehicle electrification on brake wear particle (BWP) emissions under real-world driving conditions\",\"authors\":\"Sang-Hee Woo,&nbsp;Wooyoung Kim,&nbsp;Minki Kim,&nbsp;Hyoungjoon Jang,&nbsp;Seokhwan Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wear.2025.206392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Brake wear particle (BWP), a significant source of non-exhaust emissions, have gained increased regulatory attention with their inclusion in the Euro 7 standards. Regenerative braking in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and pure battery electric vehicles (PEVs) can reduce BWP emissions, but real-world validation of its effectiveness and of the UN GTR No. 24 <em>c</em>-factor estimation method remains limited. We aimed to assess real-world BWP emission factors of internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEVs), HEVs, and PEVs, and evaluate the predictive accuracy of UN GTR No. 24 <em>c</em>-factors. On-road measurements of BWP emissions and friction braking energy were conducted across urban, rural, and motorway routes. Emission estimates using UN GTR No. 24 <em>c</em>-factors were compared to measured values. HEVs and PEVs showed BWP emission reductions of 61–82 % and 96–98 %, respectively, compared to ICEVs. The lowest regenerative braking rates and the highest BWP emissions were observed in urban driving, where braking frequency was highest. Conversely, rural and motorway conditions showed lower friction braking energy and proportionally lower BWP emissions. The application of UN GTR No. 24 <em>c</em>-factors provided reasonable estimates but tended to overestimate BWP emissions in PEVs and HEVs. Regenerative braking significantly reduces BWP emissions, with real-world reductions closely linked to decreased friction braking.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wear\",\"volume\":\"584 \",\"pages\":\"Article 206392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wear\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043164825006611\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wear","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043164825006611","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制动磨损颗粒(BWP)是一种重要的非废气排放源,在欧7标准中得到了越来越多的监管关注。混合动力汽车(hev)和纯电池电动汽车(pev)的再生制动可以减少BWP排放,但对其有效性和UN GTR No. 24 c因子估计方法的实际验证仍然有限。我们的目的是评估内燃机汽车(icev)、混合动力汽车(hev)和电动汽车(pev)的实际BWP排放因子,并评估UN GTR No. 24 c-因子的预测准确性。在城市、农村和高速公路上进行了BWP排放和摩擦制动能量的道路测量。利用联合国GTR第24号c因子估算的排放量与实测值进行了比较。与icev相比,hev和pev的BWP排放量分别减少了61 - 82%和96 - 98%。在制动频率最高的城市驾驶中,再生制动率最低,BWP排放最高。相反,农村和高速公路条件下的摩擦制动能量较低,BWP排放量也相应较低。联合国GTR第24号c因子的应用提供了合理的估计,但往往高估了电动汽车和混合动力汽车的BWP排放量。再生制动显著降低了BWP排放,与实际减少摩擦制动密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of vehicle electrification on brake wear particle (BWP) emissions under real-world driving conditions
Brake wear particle (BWP), a significant source of non-exhaust emissions, have gained increased regulatory attention with their inclusion in the Euro 7 standards. Regenerative braking in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and pure battery electric vehicles (PEVs) can reduce BWP emissions, but real-world validation of its effectiveness and of the UN GTR No. 24 c-factor estimation method remains limited. We aimed to assess real-world BWP emission factors of internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEVs), HEVs, and PEVs, and evaluate the predictive accuracy of UN GTR No. 24 c-factors. On-road measurements of BWP emissions and friction braking energy were conducted across urban, rural, and motorway routes. Emission estimates using UN GTR No. 24 c-factors were compared to measured values. HEVs and PEVs showed BWP emission reductions of 61–82 % and 96–98 %, respectively, compared to ICEVs. The lowest regenerative braking rates and the highest BWP emissions were observed in urban driving, where braking frequency was highest. Conversely, rural and motorway conditions showed lower friction braking energy and proportionally lower BWP emissions. The application of UN GTR No. 24 c-factors provided reasonable estimates but tended to overestimate BWP emissions in PEVs and HEVs. Regenerative braking significantly reduces BWP emissions, with real-world reductions closely linked to decreased friction braking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wear
Wear 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Wear journal is dedicated to the advancement of basic and applied knowledge concerning the nature of wear of materials. Broadly, topics of interest range from development of fundamental understanding of the mechanisms of wear to innovative solutions to practical engineering problems. Authors of experimental studies are expected to comment on the repeatability of the data, and whenever possible, conduct multiple measurements under similar testing conditions. Further, Wear embraces the highest standards of professional ethics, and the detection of matching content, either in written or graphical form, from other publications by the current authors or by others, may result in rejection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信