将收入损失和拥堵成本纳入铁路货运补贴设计:中欧货运网络的经验教训

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Chi Xie , Rusi Wang , Dianlei Wang , Bo Zou , Xiaowen Fu , Xiqun Chen , Qing-Chang Lu
{"title":"将收入损失和拥堵成本纳入铁路货运补贴设计:中欧货运网络的经验教训","authors":"Chi Xie ,&nbsp;Rusi Wang ,&nbsp;Dianlei Wang ,&nbsp;Bo Zou ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Fu ,&nbsp;Xiqun Chen ,&nbsp;Qing-Chang Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using the China-Europe freight transportation market as a real-world case, this study utilizes network-based evaluation and optimization models to analyze and improve the efficacy of government subsidies on China Railway Express (CRE). To ensure the completeness and effectiveness of the evaluation and optimization results, we include into the models the full range of CRE service lines, China-Europe liner shipping lines, major highway networks in China and Europe, and all types of containerized freight demands in the market. A multimodal, multicommodity freight transportation network equilibrium model explicitly considering transportation capacity is taken as a subsidy evaluation tool, which can characterize the individual mode-route choice behavior and take into account shipping cost, transit time, capacity-induced congestion surcharge, and unobserved transportation impedances as shippers' decision-making disutility. The evaluation work reveals that the currently implemented subsidy scheme increases the CRE-carried freight volume by 78.7 % in total. However, it does not perform equitably well for those CRE lines that experience heavy congestion or depart from coastal regions of China, and it even exacerbates the congestion of some CRE lines. To overcome these unexpected deficiencies, we propose and implement a subsidy optimization model of a bi-term objective and bi-level structure for simultaneously maximizing capacity utilization and minimizing congestion level of all CRE lines. This model embeds the aforementioned network equilibrium model as its submodel in the lower level. From the optimized subsidy scheme, we found that while the government's monthly average subsidy expenditure is lowered by 7.7 %, the total revenue loss and total congestion surcharge decrease by 27.7 % and 63.9 %, respectively, compared to the current subsidy scenario. This result indicates a tripartite win-win-win situation for the government, CRE operator, and cargo shippers. Overall, through such an optimal subsidy design, the social benefit generated by a subsidy expenditure of $1 increases from $0.69 to $1.20 to the entire China-Europe freight transportation market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103819"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating revenue loss and congestion cost into rail freight subsidy design: Lessons learned from the China-Europe freight transportation network\",\"authors\":\"Chi Xie ,&nbsp;Rusi Wang ,&nbsp;Dianlei Wang ,&nbsp;Bo Zou ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Fu ,&nbsp;Xiqun Chen ,&nbsp;Qing-Chang Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using the China-Europe freight transportation market as a real-world case, this study utilizes network-based evaluation and optimization models to analyze and improve the efficacy of government subsidies on China Railway Express (CRE). To ensure the completeness and effectiveness of the evaluation and optimization results, we include into the models the full range of CRE service lines, China-Europe liner shipping lines, major highway networks in China and Europe, and all types of containerized freight demands in the market. A multimodal, multicommodity freight transportation network equilibrium model explicitly considering transportation capacity is taken as a subsidy evaluation tool, which can characterize the individual mode-route choice behavior and take into account shipping cost, transit time, capacity-induced congestion surcharge, and unobserved transportation impedances as shippers' decision-making disutility. The evaluation work reveals that the currently implemented subsidy scheme increases the CRE-carried freight volume by 78.7 % in total. However, it does not perform equitably well for those CRE lines that experience heavy congestion or depart from coastal regions of China, and it even exacerbates the congestion of some CRE lines. To overcome these unexpected deficiencies, we propose and implement a subsidy optimization model of a bi-term objective and bi-level structure for simultaneously maximizing capacity utilization and minimizing congestion level of all CRE lines. This model embeds the aforementioned network equilibrium model as its submodel in the lower level. From the optimized subsidy scheme, we found that while the government's monthly average subsidy expenditure is lowered by 7.7 %, the total revenue loss and total congestion surcharge decrease by 27.7 % and 63.9 %, respectively, compared to the current subsidy scenario. This result indicates a tripartite win-win-win situation for the government, CRE operator, and cargo shippers. Overall, through such an optimal subsidy design, the social benefit generated by a subsidy expenditure of $1 increases from $0.69 to $1.20 to the entire China-Europe freight transportation market.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103819\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003622\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以中欧货运市场为例,运用基于网络的评价与优化模型,分析和改进中国铁路快运政府补贴的有效性。为了确保评估和优化结果的完整性和有效性,我们将全系列的CRE服务航线、中欧班轮航线、中欧主要公路网络以及市场上所有类型的集装箱货运需求纳入模型。将一个明确考虑运输能力的多式联运、多商品货运网络均衡模型作为补贴评估工具,该模型可以表征个体模式-路线选择行为,并将运输成本、运输时间、运力引起的拥堵附加费和未观察到的运输阻抗作为托运人决策的负效用。评估工作显示,目前实施的补贴计划使铁路运输货运量增加了78.7%。然而,对于那些拥堵严重或从中国沿海地区出发的CRE线路,它的表现并不公平,甚至加剧了一些CRE线路的拥堵。为了克服这些意想不到的不足,我们提出并实现了一个双期目标和双层次结构的补贴优化模型,以同时最大化所有CRE线路的容量利用率和最小化拥堵水平。该模型将上述网络均衡模型作为其下级模型嵌入。通过优化后的补贴方案,我们发现,与现有补贴方案相比,政府每月平均补贴支出降低了7.7%,总收入损失和总拥堵附加费分别减少了27.7%和63.9%。这是政府、CRE、货主三方共赢的结果。总体而言,通过这种最优补贴设计,1美元补贴支出对整个中欧货运市场产生的社会效益从0.69美元增加到1.20美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incorporating revenue loss and congestion cost into rail freight subsidy design: Lessons learned from the China-Europe freight transportation network
Using the China-Europe freight transportation market as a real-world case, this study utilizes network-based evaluation and optimization models to analyze and improve the efficacy of government subsidies on China Railway Express (CRE). To ensure the completeness and effectiveness of the evaluation and optimization results, we include into the models the full range of CRE service lines, China-Europe liner shipping lines, major highway networks in China and Europe, and all types of containerized freight demands in the market. A multimodal, multicommodity freight transportation network equilibrium model explicitly considering transportation capacity is taken as a subsidy evaluation tool, which can characterize the individual mode-route choice behavior and take into account shipping cost, transit time, capacity-induced congestion surcharge, and unobserved transportation impedances as shippers' decision-making disutility. The evaluation work reveals that the currently implemented subsidy scheme increases the CRE-carried freight volume by 78.7 % in total. However, it does not perform equitably well for those CRE lines that experience heavy congestion or depart from coastal regions of China, and it even exacerbates the congestion of some CRE lines. To overcome these unexpected deficiencies, we propose and implement a subsidy optimization model of a bi-term objective and bi-level structure for simultaneously maximizing capacity utilization and minimizing congestion level of all CRE lines. This model embeds the aforementioned network equilibrium model as its submodel in the lower level. From the optimized subsidy scheme, we found that while the government's monthly average subsidy expenditure is lowered by 7.7 %, the total revenue loss and total congestion surcharge decrease by 27.7 % and 63.9 %, respectively, compared to the current subsidy scenario. This result indicates a tripartite win-win-win situation for the government, CRE operator, and cargo shippers. Overall, through such an optimal subsidy design, the social benefit generated by a subsidy expenditure of $1 increases from $0.69 to $1.20 to the entire China-Europe freight transportation market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信