南亚和东南亚犬类无形体病:系统综述

IF 1.4 Q3 PARASITOLOGY
Vindya Perera , Marina E. Eremeeva , Ashoka Dangolla , Shobhath Wijeratne , Rupika S. Rajakaruna
{"title":"南亚和东南亚犬类无形体病:系统综述","authors":"Vindya Perera ,&nbsp;Marina E. Eremeeva ,&nbsp;Ashoka Dangolla ,&nbsp;Shobhath Wijeratne ,&nbsp;Rupika S. Rajakaruna","doi":"10.1016/j.vprsr.2025.101349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Canine anaplasmoses are tick-borne infections caused by two species of bacteria in the genus <em>Anaplasma. Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em> is the causative agent of granulocytic anaplasmosis with a global distribution and the etiological agent of human anaplasmosis while <em>A. platys</em> causes cyclic thrombocytopenia with a lower prevalence. This review offers a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of canine anaplasmoses in South and Southeast Asia, a region where the disease has not received adequate attention. It provides detailed insights into the prevalence, geographical distribution, clinical signs, diagnostic methods, treatment strategies, risk factors, vectors, and zoonotic potential of canine anaplasmoses encompassing research published from 2000 to 2024. Seventy-one studies met the selection criteria. Infection with <em>A. platys</em> is more prevalent among dogs in the region, with cases reported in 13 countries, compared to <em>A. phagocytophilum</em>, which has been reported only in India and Malaysia. The infection rate of the two species varies widely between 1.3 % – 70.5 %. Concurrent infections with eight other canine pathogens were reported. Although <em>Anaplasma</em> DNA was detected in <em>Rhipicephalus sanguineus,</em> and four other tick species, specific biological vectors for <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> and <em>A. platys</em> have not been identified in these regions. Risk factors for canine anaplasmosis include sex, age, tick infestation, lack of tick-controlling methods, concurrent louse infestation, and climatic factors. Apart from 49 human cases of granulocytic anaplasmosis in India, extent of human infection remains largely unknown. Since most of the studies were limited to specific localities, accurately assessing the disease burden is a challenge. Overall, limited information is available on geographic distribution, prevalence, genetic diversity, vectors, and zoonotic potential of the pathogens in the region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23600,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canine Anaplasmoses in south and Southeast Asia: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Vindya Perera ,&nbsp;Marina E. Eremeeva ,&nbsp;Ashoka Dangolla ,&nbsp;Shobhath Wijeratne ,&nbsp;Rupika S. Rajakaruna\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vprsr.2025.101349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Canine anaplasmoses are tick-borne infections caused by two species of bacteria in the genus <em>Anaplasma. Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em> is the causative agent of granulocytic anaplasmosis with a global distribution and the etiological agent of human anaplasmosis while <em>A. platys</em> causes cyclic thrombocytopenia with a lower prevalence. This review offers a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of canine anaplasmoses in South and Southeast Asia, a region where the disease has not received adequate attention. It provides detailed insights into the prevalence, geographical distribution, clinical signs, diagnostic methods, treatment strategies, risk factors, vectors, and zoonotic potential of canine anaplasmoses encompassing research published from 2000 to 2024. Seventy-one studies met the selection criteria. Infection with <em>A. platys</em> is more prevalent among dogs in the region, with cases reported in 13 countries, compared to <em>A. phagocytophilum</em>, which has been reported only in India and Malaysia. The infection rate of the two species varies widely between 1.3 % – 70.5 %. Concurrent infections with eight other canine pathogens were reported. Although <em>Anaplasma</em> DNA was detected in <em>Rhipicephalus sanguineus,</em> and four other tick species, specific biological vectors for <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> and <em>A. platys</em> have not been identified in these regions. Risk factors for canine anaplasmosis include sex, age, tick infestation, lack of tick-controlling methods, concurrent louse infestation, and climatic factors. Apart from 49 human cases of granulocytic anaplasmosis in India, extent of human infection remains largely unknown. Since most of the studies were limited to specific localities, accurately assessing the disease burden is a challenge. Overall, limited information is available on geographic distribution, prevalence, genetic diversity, vectors, and zoonotic potential of the pathogens in the region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405939025001571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405939025001571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

犬无原体病是由无原体属的两种细菌引起的蜱传感染。嗜吞噬细胞无原体是全球分布的粒细胞无形体病的病原体,也是人类无形体病的病原,而血小板无原体引起的循环血小板减少症发病率较低。这篇综述提供了南亚和东南亚犬无形体病的全面和最新的分析,该地区的疾病没有得到足够的重视。它提供了详细的见解,患病率,地理分布,临床症状,诊断方法,治疗策略,风险因素,媒介,和人畜共患的可能性犬无浆虫包括2000年至2024年发表的研究。71项研究符合选择标准。该地区的犬类感染鸭嘴虫更为普遍,有13个国家报告了病例,而嗜吞噬单胞菌仅在印度和马来西亚报告了病例。两种的感染率相差很大,在1.3% - 70.5%之间。同时感染其他八种犬病原体的报道。虽然在血鼻头蜱和其他4种蜱类中检测到无原体DNA,但在这些地区尚未发现嗜吞噬性蜱和扁蜱的特异性生物载体。犬无形体病的危险因素包括性别、年龄、蜱虫感染、缺乏蜱虫控制方法、同时存在的虱子感染和气候因素。除了印度49例人间粒细胞无形体病病例外,人间感染的程度在很大程度上仍然未知。由于大多数研究仅限于特定地区,因此准确评估疾病负担是一项挑战。总的来说,关于该地区病原体的地理分布、流行、遗传多样性、媒介和人畜共患潜力的信息有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Canine Anaplasmoses in south and Southeast Asia: A systematic review
Canine anaplasmoses are tick-borne infections caused by two species of bacteria in the genus Anaplasma. Anaplasma phagocytophilum is the causative agent of granulocytic anaplasmosis with a global distribution and the etiological agent of human anaplasmosis while A. platys causes cyclic thrombocytopenia with a lower prevalence. This review offers a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of canine anaplasmoses in South and Southeast Asia, a region where the disease has not received adequate attention. It provides detailed insights into the prevalence, geographical distribution, clinical signs, diagnostic methods, treatment strategies, risk factors, vectors, and zoonotic potential of canine anaplasmoses encompassing research published from 2000 to 2024. Seventy-one studies met the selection criteria. Infection with A. platys is more prevalent among dogs in the region, with cases reported in 13 countries, compared to A. phagocytophilum, which has been reported only in India and Malaysia. The infection rate of the two species varies widely between 1.3 % – 70.5 %. Concurrent infections with eight other canine pathogens were reported. Although Anaplasma DNA was detected in Rhipicephalus sanguineus, and four other tick species, specific biological vectors for A. phagocytophilum and A. platys have not been identified in these regions. Risk factors for canine anaplasmosis include sex, age, tick infestation, lack of tick-controlling methods, concurrent louse infestation, and climatic factors. Apart from 49 human cases of granulocytic anaplasmosis in India, extent of human infection remains largely unknown. Since most of the studies were limited to specific localities, accurately assessing the disease burden is a challenge. Overall, limited information is available on geographic distribution, prevalence, genetic diversity, vectors, and zoonotic potential of the pathogens in the region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
97 days
期刊介绍: Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports focuses on aspects of veterinary parasitology that are of regional concern, which is especially important in this era of climate change and the rapid and often unconstrained travel of people and animals. Relative to regions, this journal will accept papers of the highest quality dealing with all aspects of disease prevention, pathology, treatment, epidemiology, and control of parasites within the field of veterinary medicine. Also, case reports will be considered as they add to information related to local disease and its control; such papers must be concise and represent appropriate medical intervention. Papers on veterinary parasitology from wildlife species are acceptable, but only if they relate to the practice of veterinary medicine. Studies on vector-borne bacterial and viral agents are suitable, but only if the paper deals with vector transmission of these organisms to domesticated animals. Studies dealing with parasite control by means of natural products, both in vivo and in vitro, are more suited for one of the many journals that now specialize in papers of this type. However, due to the regional nature of much of this research, submissions may be considered based upon a case being made by the author(s) to the Editor. Circumstances relating to animal experimentation must meet the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals as issued by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (obtainable from: Executive Secretary C.I.O.M.S., c/o W.H.O., Via Appia, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信