深入分析赤泥、循环流化床粉煤灰、脱硫石膏在泡沫轻质土制备中的协同作用:反应机理、性能优化及碳排放分析

IF 7.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Jiarui Gu , Yujie Shao , Chao Wei , Zinuo Tian , Zengqi Zhang , Xiaoming Liu , Junyong Wang , Lilei Zhu , Chunjiang Wang , Jianying Zhang
{"title":"深入分析赤泥、循环流化床粉煤灰、脱硫石膏在泡沫轻质土制备中的协同作用:反应机理、性能优化及碳排放分析","authors":"Jiarui Gu ,&nbsp;Yujie Shao ,&nbsp;Chao Wei ,&nbsp;Zinuo Tian ,&nbsp;Zengqi Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Liu ,&nbsp;Junyong Wang ,&nbsp;Lilei Zhu ,&nbsp;Chunjiang Wang ,&nbsp;Jianying Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.108029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Foam lightweight soil (FLS) is a kind of porous lightweight engineering material with low density, high fluidity, and controllable strength. It is widely used in civil engineering in the fields of filling, roadbed reinforcement, and slope support. This study developed a novel FLS through synergistic utilization of red mud (RM), circulating fluidized bed fly ash (CFA), and desulfurized gypsum (DG). The response surface method (RSM) was used to design 16 sets of experiments and to predict the mechanical properties of the FLS. Moreover, the reaction mechanisms, compound synergistic effects and carbon emissions of the solid wastes were analyzed in depth. The results revealed that when the RM dosage was less than 50 %, the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of FLS tended to increase and then decreased with increasing CFA dosage and decreasing DG dosage. The prediction result of the RSM indicated that the 7 d and 28 d UCS of FLS can be more than 1.8 MPa and 2.1 MPa, respectively, at solid waste doses greater than 50 %. Microanalysis revealed that the UCS of FLS was influenced by both the hydration products and the pore structure. Too much RM incorporation leads to more macropores and connecting pores in FLS, which is not conducive to strength. In addition, the carbon emission and social cost of carbon of the FLS were approximately 45.476 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/m<sup>3</sup> and 2.85$, respectively. A comparison of results from other studies revealed that each cubic meter of FLS reduces <span><math><msub><mrow><mtext>E</mtext></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>CO</mtext></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></math></span> and SCC by approximately 75.2∼86.7 % while ensuring that the performance meets the required engineering requirements. This paper provides a theory for the preparation of solid waste-based FLS in roadbed filler and slope support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 108029"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-depth analysis of the synergistic effects of red mud, circulating fluidized bed fly ash and desulfurization gypsum in the preparation of foam lightweight soil: Reaction mechanism, performance optimization and carbon emission analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jiarui Gu ,&nbsp;Yujie Shao ,&nbsp;Chao Wei ,&nbsp;Zinuo Tian ,&nbsp;Zengqi Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Liu ,&nbsp;Junyong Wang ,&nbsp;Lilei Zhu ,&nbsp;Chunjiang Wang ,&nbsp;Jianying Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psep.2025.108029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Foam lightweight soil (FLS) is a kind of porous lightweight engineering material with low density, high fluidity, and controllable strength. It is widely used in civil engineering in the fields of filling, roadbed reinforcement, and slope support. This study developed a novel FLS through synergistic utilization of red mud (RM), circulating fluidized bed fly ash (CFA), and desulfurized gypsum (DG). The response surface method (RSM) was used to design 16 sets of experiments and to predict the mechanical properties of the FLS. Moreover, the reaction mechanisms, compound synergistic effects and carbon emissions of the solid wastes were analyzed in depth. The results revealed that when the RM dosage was less than 50 %, the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of FLS tended to increase and then decreased with increasing CFA dosage and decreasing DG dosage. The prediction result of the RSM indicated that the 7 d and 28 d UCS of FLS can be more than 1.8 MPa and 2.1 MPa, respectively, at solid waste doses greater than 50 %. Microanalysis revealed that the UCS of FLS was influenced by both the hydration products and the pore structure. Too much RM incorporation leads to more macropores and connecting pores in FLS, which is not conducive to strength. In addition, the carbon emission and social cost of carbon of the FLS were approximately 45.476 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/m<sup>3</sup> and 2.85$, respectively. A comparison of results from other studies revealed that each cubic meter of FLS reduces <span><math><msub><mrow><mtext>E</mtext></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>CO</mtext></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></math></span> and SCC by approximately 75.2∼86.7 % while ensuring that the performance meets the required engineering requirements. This paper provides a theory for the preparation of solid waste-based FLS in roadbed filler and slope support.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"203 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108029\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025012960\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025012960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

泡沫轻质土(FLS)是一种低密度、高流动性、强度可控的多孔轻质工程材料。在土木工程中广泛应用于填筑、路基加固、边坡支护等领域。本研究通过赤泥(RM)、循环流化床粉煤灰(CFA)和脱硫石膏(DG)的协同利用,开发了一种新型FLS。采用响应面法(RSM)设计了16组试验,并对FLS的力学性能进行了预测。并对反应机理、复合协同效应及固废碳排放进行了深入分析。结果表明,当RM掺量小于50% %时,FLS的无侧限抗压强度(UCS)随CFA掺量的增加和DG掺量的减少呈现先增大后减小的趋势;RSM预测结果表明,当固体废物添加量大于50% %时,FLS的7 d和28 d UCS分别大于1.8 MPa和2.1 MPa。微观分析结果表明,水化产物和孔隙结构共同影响了FLS的单抗强度。掺入过多的RM会导致FLS中存在较多的大孔和连接孔,不利于强度的提高。此外,FLS的碳排放和碳社会成本分别约为45.476 kgCO2/m3和2.85$。与其他研究结果的比较表明,每立方米FLS可减少约75.2 ~ 86.7%的ECO2和SCC,同时确保性能满足所需的工程要求。本文为固体废物基FLS在路基填料和边坡支护中的制备提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-depth analysis of the synergistic effects of red mud, circulating fluidized bed fly ash and desulfurization gypsum in the preparation of foam lightweight soil: Reaction mechanism, performance optimization and carbon emission analysis
Foam lightweight soil (FLS) is a kind of porous lightweight engineering material with low density, high fluidity, and controllable strength. It is widely used in civil engineering in the fields of filling, roadbed reinforcement, and slope support. This study developed a novel FLS through synergistic utilization of red mud (RM), circulating fluidized bed fly ash (CFA), and desulfurized gypsum (DG). The response surface method (RSM) was used to design 16 sets of experiments and to predict the mechanical properties of the FLS. Moreover, the reaction mechanisms, compound synergistic effects and carbon emissions of the solid wastes were analyzed in depth. The results revealed that when the RM dosage was less than 50 %, the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of FLS tended to increase and then decreased with increasing CFA dosage and decreasing DG dosage. The prediction result of the RSM indicated that the 7 d and 28 d UCS of FLS can be more than 1.8 MPa and 2.1 MPa, respectively, at solid waste doses greater than 50 %. Microanalysis revealed that the UCS of FLS was influenced by both the hydration products and the pore structure. Too much RM incorporation leads to more macropores and connecting pores in FLS, which is not conducive to strength. In addition, the carbon emission and social cost of carbon of the FLS were approximately 45.476 kgCO2/m3 and 2.85$, respectively. A comparison of results from other studies revealed that each cubic meter of FLS reduces ECO2 and SCC by approximately 75.2∼86.7 % while ensuring that the performance meets the required engineering requirements. This paper provides a theory for the preparation of solid waste-based FLS in roadbed filler and slope support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信