随着时间的推移,教师使用开放和负担得起的课程材料:重新思考价值和影响

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Lily Todorinova , Zara Wilkinson
{"title":"随着时间的推移,教师使用开放和负担得起的课程材料:重新思考价值和影响","authors":"Lily Todorinova ,&nbsp;Zara Wilkinson","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines long-term faculty engagement with open educational resources (OER) and affordable course materials following their participation in a library-funded course redesign initiative (2016–2024). A survey was administered to 138 awardees, with a 55 % response rate. The research assessed whether faculty continued to use, revise, or abandon the open and affordable materials they initially adopted and explored broader impacts on teaching practices. Most respondents continued using open and affordable materials or updated them with other low-cost options. Notably, 21 faculty redesigned additional courses without further funding. Results suggest that open and affordable course materials became increasingly integrated into faculty teaching practices over time. The study also considers the concept of cumulative student savings as a metric for program success, raising questions about how to define and track long-term impact. Findings highlight the importance of sustained library support to encourage continued use, innovation, and scalability of affordability initiatives in higher education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faculty use of open and affordable course materials over time: Rethinking value and impact\",\"authors\":\"Lily Todorinova ,&nbsp;Zara Wilkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines long-term faculty engagement with open educational resources (OER) and affordable course materials following their participation in a library-funded course redesign initiative (2016–2024). A survey was administered to 138 awardees, with a 55 % response rate. The research assessed whether faculty continued to use, revise, or abandon the open and affordable materials they initially adopted and explored broader impacts on teaching practices. Most respondents continued using open and affordable materials or updated them with other low-cost options. Notably, 21 faculty redesigned additional courses without further funding. Results suggest that open and affordable course materials became increasingly integrated into faculty teaching practices over time. The study also considers the concept of cumulative student savings as a metric for program success, raising questions about how to define and track long-term impact. Findings highlight the importance of sustained library support to encourage continued use, innovation, and scalability of affordability initiatives in higher education.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"51 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 103155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009913332500151X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009913332500151X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了教师参与图书馆资助的课程重新设计计划(2016-2024)后,长期参与开放教育资源(OER)和负担得起的课程材料的情况。对138名获奖者进行了调查,回复率为55%。该研究评估了教师是否继续使用、修改或放弃他们最初采用的开放和负担得起的材料,并探索了对教学实践的更广泛影响。大多数受访者继续使用开放和负担得起的材料,或使用其他低成本的选择进行更新。值得注意的是,21个学院在没有进一步资助的情况下重新设计了额外的课程。结果表明,随着时间的推移,开放和负担得起的课程材料越来越多地融入教师的教学实践。该研究还将学生累计储蓄的概念作为项目成功的衡量标准,提出了如何定义和跟踪长期影响的问题。研究结果强调了持续的图书馆支持对于鼓励高等教育中可负担性举措的持续使用、创新和可扩展性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Faculty use of open and affordable course materials over time: Rethinking value and impact
This study examines long-term faculty engagement with open educational resources (OER) and affordable course materials following their participation in a library-funded course redesign initiative (2016–2024). A survey was administered to 138 awardees, with a 55 % response rate. The research assessed whether faculty continued to use, revise, or abandon the open and affordable materials they initially adopted and explored broader impacts on teaching practices. Most respondents continued using open and affordable materials or updated them with other low-cost options. Notably, 21 faculty redesigned additional courses without further funding. Results suggest that open and affordable course materials became increasingly integrated into faculty teaching practices over time. The study also considers the concept of cumulative student savings as a metric for program success, raising questions about how to define and track long-term impact. Findings highlight the importance of sustained library support to encourage continued use, innovation, and scalability of affordability initiatives in higher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信