利用光谱学改进带隙测定:ISARS、UV-vis和漫反射的比较评价。

IF 4.6 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
ACS Measurement Science Au Pub Date : 2025-08-26 eCollection Date: 2025-10-15 DOI:10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.5c00059
Huy Pham, Juliana Cardoso Neves, Rongjing Yan, Viktorija Pankratova, Wei Cao, Dongmao Zhang
{"title":"利用光谱学改进带隙测定:ISARS、UV-vis和漫反射的比较评价。","authors":"Huy Pham, Juliana Cardoso Neves, Rongjing Yan, Viktorija Pankratova, Wei Cao, Dongmao Zhang","doi":"10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.5c00059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reliability of the Tauc plot method for estimating a material's optical bandgap critically depends on the accurate quantification of its absorption coefficient (α), defined as the path length-normalized absorbance. This study systematically evaluates and compares three spectroscopic techniques, ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), and integrating sphere-assisted resonance synchronous spectroscopy (ISARS), for their effectiveness in determining the absorption coefficient spectrum used in Tauc plot-based bandgap analysis. For each technique, a generalized mathematical model is developed by parametrizing the measured spectral signal as a functional expression of the sample's optical properties and experimental conditions. These models provide a conceptual framework under which the measured spectra can reliably approximate the true absorption coefficient spectrum, particularly for materials with diverse optical behaviors. UV-vis spectroscopy is found to have highly limited applicability and is suitable only in rare cases where samples are free from scattering and fluorescence interference. While DRS and ISARS yield comparable accuracy for nonfluorescent solids, DRS is constrained by its sensitivity to fluorescence artifacts and its restriction to solid-state samples. In contrast, ISARS consistently outperforms both methods: it is effective for both solid- and solution-phase samples, demonstrates strong resilience against scattering and fluorescence interference, and requires minimal sample preparation. Importantly, ISARS can be readily implemented by using a standard commercial spectrofluorometer equipped with an integrating sphere, making it both practical and accessible. Given its superior accuracy, broad applicability, and ease of use, ISARS stands out as a robust and versatile technique for precise bandgap characterization, offering significant promise for accelerating the discovery and development of photoactive materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":29800,"journal":{"name":"ACS Measurement Science Au","volume":"5 5","pages":"666-676"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12532058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Bandgap Determination by Optical Spectroscopy: Comparative Evaluation of ISARS, UV-vis, and Diffuse Reflectance.\",\"authors\":\"Huy Pham, Juliana Cardoso Neves, Rongjing Yan, Viktorija Pankratova, Wei Cao, Dongmao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.5c00059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The reliability of the Tauc plot method for estimating a material's optical bandgap critically depends on the accurate quantification of its absorption coefficient (α), defined as the path length-normalized absorbance. This study systematically evaluates and compares three spectroscopic techniques, ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), and integrating sphere-assisted resonance synchronous spectroscopy (ISARS), for their effectiveness in determining the absorption coefficient spectrum used in Tauc plot-based bandgap analysis. For each technique, a generalized mathematical model is developed by parametrizing the measured spectral signal as a functional expression of the sample's optical properties and experimental conditions. These models provide a conceptual framework under which the measured spectra can reliably approximate the true absorption coefficient spectrum, particularly for materials with diverse optical behaviors. UV-vis spectroscopy is found to have highly limited applicability and is suitable only in rare cases where samples are free from scattering and fluorescence interference. While DRS and ISARS yield comparable accuracy for nonfluorescent solids, DRS is constrained by its sensitivity to fluorescence artifacts and its restriction to solid-state samples. In contrast, ISARS consistently outperforms both methods: it is effective for both solid- and solution-phase samples, demonstrates strong resilience against scattering and fluorescence interference, and requires minimal sample preparation. Importantly, ISARS can be readily implemented by using a standard commercial spectrofluorometer equipped with an integrating sphere, making it both practical and accessible. Given its superior accuracy, broad applicability, and ease of use, ISARS stands out as a robust and versatile technique for precise bandgap characterization, offering significant promise for accelerating the discovery and development of photoactive materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Measurement Science Au\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"666-676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12532058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Measurement Science Au\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.5c00059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Measurement Science Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.5c00059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

估计材料光学带隙的tac图方法的可靠性关键取决于其吸收系数(α)的精确量化,其定义为路径长度归一化吸光度。本研究系统地评估和比较了三种光谱技术,紫外-可见(UV-vis)光谱、漫反射光谱(DRS)和积分球辅助共振同步光谱(ISARS),以确定基于Tauc图的带隙分析中使用的吸收系数光谱。对于每种技术,通过将测量的光谱信号参数化为样品光学性质和实验条件的函数表达式,建立了一个广义的数学模型。这些模型提供了一个概念框架,在这个框架下,测量的光谱可以可靠地近似真实的吸收系数光谱,特别是对于具有不同光学行为的材料。发现紫外可见光谱的适用性非常有限,仅适用于样品不受散射和荧光干扰的极少数情况。虽然DRS和ISARS对非荧光固体产生相当的精度,但DRS受到其对荧光伪影的敏感性和对固态样品的限制。相比之下,ISARS一直优于这两种方法:它对固相和固相样品都有效,对散射和荧光干扰具有很强的弹性,并且需要最少的样品制备。重要的是,ISARS可以很容易地通过使用配备积分球的标准商用荧光光谱仪来实现,使其既实用又易于使用。由于其卓越的准确性、广泛的适用性和易用性,ISARS作为一种强大而通用的精确带隙表征技术脱颖而出,为加速光活性材料的发现和开发提供了重要的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Bandgap Determination by Optical Spectroscopy: Comparative Evaluation of ISARS, UV-vis, and Diffuse Reflectance.

The reliability of the Tauc plot method for estimating a material's optical bandgap critically depends on the accurate quantification of its absorption coefficient (α), defined as the path length-normalized absorbance. This study systematically evaluates and compares three spectroscopic techniques, ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), and integrating sphere-assisted resonance synchronous spectroscopy (ISARS), for their effectiveness in determining the absorption coefficient spectrum used in Tauc plot-based bandgap analysis. For each technique, a generalized mathematical model is developed by parametrizing the measured spectral signal as a functional expression of the sample's optical properties and experimental conditions. These models provide a conceptual framework under which the measured spectra can reliably approximate the true absorption coefficient spectrum, particularly for materials with diverse optical behaviors. UV-vis spectroscopy is found to have highly limited applicability and is suitable only in rare cases where samples are free from scattering and fluorescence interference. While DRS and ISARS yield comparable accuracy for nonfluorescent solids, DRS is constrained by its sensitivity to fluorescence artifacts and its restriction to solid-state samples. In contrast, ISARS consistently outperforms both methods: it is effective for both solid- and solution-phase samples, demonstrates strong resilience against scattering and fluorescence interference, and requires minimal sample preparation. Importantly, ISARS can be readily implemented by using a standard commercial spectrofluorometer equipped with an integrating sphere, making it both practical and accessible. Given its superior accuracy, broad applicability, and ease of use, ISARS stands out as a robust and versatile technique for precise bandgap characterization, offering significant promise for accelerating the discovery and development of photoactive materials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Measurement Science Au
ACS Measurement Science Au 化学计量学-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ACS Measurement Science Au is an open access journal that publishes experimental computational or theoretical research in all areas of chemical measurement science. Short letters comprehensive articles reviews and perspectives are welcome on topics that report on any phase of analytical operations including sampling measurement and data analysis. This includes:Chemical Reactions and SelectivityChemometrics and Data ProcessingElectrochemistryElemental and Molecular CharacterizationImagingInstrumentationMass SpectrometryMicroscale and Nanoscale systemsOmics (Genomics Proteomics Metabonomics Metabolomics and Bioinformatics)Sensors and Sensing (Biosensors Chemical Sensors Gas Sensors Intracellular Sensors Single-Molecule Sensors Cell Chips Arrays Microfluidic Devices)SeparationsSpectroscopySurface analysisPapers dealing with established methods need to offer a significantly improved original application of the method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信