口腔内瓷修复系统与各种CAD/CAM修复材料的剪切结合强度。

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yusuf Polat, Gözde Sarak, Zeynep Özkurt-Kayahan
{"title":"口腔内瓷修复系统与各种CAD/CAM修复材料的剪切结合强度。","authors":"Yusuf Polat, Gözde Sarak, Zeynep Özkurt-Kayahan","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_113_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this research was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of two intraoral porcelain repair systems to various restorative materials with and without thermocycling.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>The study employed an in vitro design with a disc-shaped samples (7 mm × 3 mm) bonded to repair systems, including thermocycling and SBS test with a universal testing machine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two hundred polyetheretherketone (PEEK), cobalt-chromium, zirconia, titanium, and glass ceramic samples were prepared with the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture system according to the ISO 6872:2024 (n = 40). After all samples were polished with silicon carbide sandpaper, the bonding surface was roughened with 50 µm Al2O3. Then, all materials were divided into two subgroups (n = 20) according to the repair system used: Bredent and Clearfil repair systems. After sample preparation, each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 10) and subjected to different storage conditions, short- and long-term storage (with 5000 thermocycles). SBS tests were performed on all samples, and fracture types were examined.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test. Significance was determined as P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In short-term storage, when Clearfil repair system was evaluated, the lowest SBS values were recorded for glass ceramic (7.88 ± 1.63 MPa), and the highest SBS values were recorded for titanium (14.92 ± 3.65 MPa) (P < 0.05). When Bredent repair system was evaluated in short-term storage, the lowest SBS values were recorded for zirconia (8.33 ± 1.84 MPa), and the highest SBS values were recorded for titanium (15.77 ± 5.79 MPa) (P < 0.05). Long-term storage decreased the bonding between the materials and the repair systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Clearfil system, used on metal, titanium, and zirconia, and the Bredent system used on PEEK, metal, and titanium materials, demonstrated a minimum SBS of 10 MPa in the short term, suggesting their appropriateness for clinical use. Long-term storage decreased the bonding between the materials and the repair systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"25 4","pages":"295-304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear bond strength of intraoral porcelain repair systems to various CAD/CAM restorative materials.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Polat, Gözde Sarak, Zeynep Özkurt-Kayahan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jips.jips_113_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this research was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of two intraoral porcelain repair systems to various restorative materials with and without thermocycling.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>The study employed an in vitro design with a disc-shaped samples (7 mm × 3 mm) bonded to repair systems, including thermocycling and SBS test with a universal testing machine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two hundred polyetheretherketone (PEEK), cobalt-chromium, zirconia, titanium, and glass ceramic samples were prepared with the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture system according to the ISO 6872:2024 (n = 40). After all samples were polished with silicon carbide sandpaper, the bonding surface was roughened with 50 µm Al2O3. Then, all materials were divided into two subgroups (n = 20) according to the repair system used: Bredent and Clearfil repair systems. After sample preparation, each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 10) and subjected to different storage conditions, short- and long-term storage (with 5000 thermocycles). SBS tests were performed on all samples, and fracture types were examined.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test. Significance was determined as P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In short-term storage, when Clearfil repair system was evaluated, the lowest SBS values were recorded for glass ceramic (7.88 ± 1.63 MPa), and the highest SBS values were recorded for titanium (14.92 ± 3.65 MPa) (P < 0.05). When Bredent repair system was evaluated in short-term storage, the lowest SBS values were recorded for zirconia (8.33 ± 1.84 MPa), and the highest SBS values were recorded for titanium (15.77 ± 5.79 MPa) (P < 0.05). Long-term storage decreased the bonding between the materials and the repair systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Clearfil system, used on metal, titanium, and zirconia, and the Bredent system used on PEEK, metal, and titanium materials, demonstrated a minimum SBS of 10 MPa in the short term, suggesting their appropriateness for clinical use. Long-term storage decreased the bonding between the materials and the repair systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"295-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_113_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_113_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较两种口腔内瓷修复系统与不同修复材料的剪切结合强度(SBS)。设置与设计:本研究采用圆盘状样品(7 mm × 3 mm)粘接修复系统的体外设计,包括热循环和通用试验机SBS测试。材料和方法:采用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造系统,按照ISO 6872:2024标准制备了200个聚醚醚酮(PEEK)、钴铬、氧化锆、钛和玻璃陶瓷样品(n = 40)。所有样品用碳化硅砂纸抛光后,用50µm Al2O3对结合表面进行粗化处理。然后,根据所使用的修复系统将所有材料分为两个亚组(n = 20): brendent和Clearfil修复系统。样品制备完成后,每组分为两个亚组(n = 10),分别进行不同的储存条件,短期和长期储存(5000热循环)。对所有样品进行SBS试验,并检查断裂类型。采用统计学分析:采用双向方差分析和Tukey's诚实显著性差异检验对数据进行分析。P < 0.05为显著性。结果:在短期保存中,评估Clearfil修复系统时,玻璃陶瓷的SBS最低(7.88±1.63 MPa),钛的SBS最高(14.92±3.65 MPa) (P < 0.05)。短期储存评价Bredent修复系统时,氧化锆SBS最低(8.33±1.84 MPa),钛SBS最高(15.77±5.79 MPa) (P < 0.05)。长期储存降低了材料与修复系统之间的结合。结论:用于金属、钛和氧化锆的Clearfil系统和用于PEEK、金属和钛材料的brendent系统在短期内表现出最低10 MPa的SBS,表明它们适合临床使用。长期储存降低了材料与修复系统之间的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shear bond strength of intraoral porcelain repair systems to various CAD/CAM restorative materials.

Aim: The aim of this research was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of two intraoral porcelain repair systems to various restorative materials with and without thermocycling.

Settings and design: The study employed an in vitro design with a disc-shaped samples (7 mm × 3 mm) bonded to repair systems, including thermocycling and SBS test with a universal testing machine.

Materials and methods: Two hundred polyetheretherketone (PEEK), cobalt-chromium, zirconia, titanium, and glass ceramic samples were prepared with the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture system according to the ISO 6872:2024 (n = 40). After all samples were polished with silicon carbide sandpaper, the bonding surface was roughened with 50 µm Al2O3. Then, all materials were divided into two subgroups (n = 20) according to the repair system used: Bredent and Clearfil repair systems. After sample preparation, each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 10) and subjected to different storage conditions, short- and long-term storage (with 5000 thermocycles). SBS tests were performed on all samples, and fracture types were examined.

Statistical analysis used: The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test. Significance was determined as P < 0.05.

Results: In short-term storage, when Clearfil repair system was evaluated, the lowest SBS values were recorded for glass ceramic (7.88 ± 1.63 MPa), and the highest SBS values were recorded for titanium (14.92 ± 3.65 MPa) (P < 0.05). When Bredent repair system was evaluated in short-term storage, the lowest SBS values were recorded for zirconia (8.33 ± 1.84 MPa), and the highest SBS values were recorded for titanium (15.77 ± 5.79 MPa) (P < 0.05). Long-term storage decreased the bonding between the materials and the repair systems.

Conclusions: The Clearfil system, used on metal, titanium, and zirconia, and the Bredent system used on PEEK, metal, and titanium materials, demonstrated a minimum SBS of 10 MPa in the short term, suggesting their appropriateness for clinical use. Long-term storage decreased the bonding between the materials and the repair systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信