阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的眼外表现作为围手术期并发症的潜在筛查工具:一项病例对照研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Megan Folsom, Juan Diaz, Nick Lowe, Abhinav Dronavalli, Jason A Sokol, Radwan S Ajlan, Arun George, Yoon Ji, Niaman Nazir
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的眼外表现作为围手术期并发症的潜在筛查工具:一项病例对照研究。","authors":"Megan Folsom, Juan Diaz, Nick Lowe, Abhinav Dronavalli, Jason A Sokol, Radwan S Ajlan, Arun George, Yoon Ji, Niaman Nazir","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08211-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea presents with a variety of potential intra- and post-operative complications; thus, adequate screening is needed to properly manage them. The gold standard for diagnosing OSA is polysomnography; however, due to access and practicality, alternative tools such as the STOP-BANG score are utilized. Another avenue to be investigated is the association between floppy eye syndrome (FES) and OSA. The aim of this study is to use STOP-BANG and FES to predict perioperative risk of complications arising from obstructive sleep apnea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective case-control study with 160 clinic participants was used in this study. Patients with known formal OSA diagnosis were excluded from the study. OSA was classified as a STOP-BANG score ≥ 3. FES was classified as grading ≥ 2. We took photographs while vertically and horizontally retracting the patient's eyes. Two blinded ophthalmologists and two blinded anesthesiologists used a graded scale to classify eyelid laxity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32.5% of patients were in the experimental OSA group and 67.5% were in the control group. FES prevalence among the OSA group was 15% and 2% among control. Ophthalmologist reviewers showed a greater incidence of FES in the OSA group compared to control (p < 0.05), while anesthesiologist reviewers did not. Ophthalmologists and anesthesiologists exhibited significant specificity (93% and 98%, respectively) and positive predictive value (88% and 86%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using FES to determine probability of OSA, as determined by the STOP-BANG questionnaire, may have utility in the perioperative setting due to its high rule-in value as shown by high specificity and positive pressure ventilation (PPV).</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extraocular Manifestations of Obstructive Sleep Apnea as a Potential Screening Tool for Perioperative Complications: A Case Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Megan Folsom, Juan Diaz, Nick Lowe, Abhinav Dronavalli, Jason A Sokol, Radwan S Ajlan, Arun George, Yoon Ji, Niaman Nazir\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-025-08211-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea presents with a variety of potential intra- and post-operative complications; thus, adequate screening is needed to properly manage them. The gold standard for diagnosing OSA is polysomnography; however, due to access and practicality, alternative tools such as the STOP-BANG score are utilized. Another avenue to be investigated is the association between floppy eye syndrome (FES) and OSA. The aim of this study is to use STOP-BANG and FES to predict perioperative risk of complications arising from obstructive sleep apnea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective case-control study with 160 clinic participants was used in this study. Patients with known formal OSA diagnosis were excluded from the study. OSA was classified as a STOP-BANG score ≥ 3. FES was classified as grading ≥ 2. We took photographs while vertically and horizontally retracting the patient's eyes. Two blinded ophthalmologists and two blinded anesthesiologists used a graded scale to classify eyelid laxity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32.5% of patients were in the experimental OSA group and 67.5% were in the control group. FES prevalence among the OSA group was 15% and 2% among control. Ophthalmologist reviewers showed a greater incidence of FES in the OSA group compared to control (p < 0.05), while anesthesiologist reviewers did not. Ophthalmologists and anesthesiologists exhibited significant specificity (93% and 98%, respectively) and positive predictive value (88% and 86%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using FES to determine probability of OSA, as determined by the STOP-BANG questionnaire, may have utility in the perioperative setting due to its high rule-in value as shown by high specificity and positive pressure ventilation (PPV).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-08211-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-08211-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停具有多种潜在的手术内和术后并发症;因此,需要进行充分的筛选,以适当地管理它们。诊断OSA的金标准是多导睡眠图;然而,由于可及性和实用性,其他工具如STOP-BANG评分也被使用。另一个有待研究的途径是软盘眼综合征(FES)和OSA之间的关系。本研究的目的是使用STOP-BANG和FES预测阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停并发症的围手术期风险。方法:采用前瞻性病例对照研究,共160例临床参与者。已知正式OSA诊断的患者被排除在研究之外。以STOP-BANG评分≥3分为OSA。FES分级≥2级。我们在垂直和水平缩回病人的眼睛时拍摄了照片。两名盲眼医师和两名盲眼麻醉医师使用分级量表对眼睑松弛进行分类。结果:实验组患者占32.5%,对照组患者占67.5%。OSA组FES患病率为15%,对照组为2%。眼科医生的审评显示,与对照组相比,OSA组的FES发生率更高(p)。结论:使用STOP-BANG问卷确定的FES来确定OSA的概率,可能在围手术期具有实用价值,因为它具有高特异性和正压通气(PPV)所显示的高规则价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extraocular Manifestations of Obstructive Sleep Apnea as a Potential Screening Tool for Perioperative Complications: A Case Control Study.

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea presents with a variety of potential intra- and post-operative complications; thus, adequate screening is needed to properly manage them. The gold standard for diagnosing OSA is polysomnography; however, due to access and practicality, alternative tools such as the STOP-BANG score are utilized. Another avenue to be investigated is the association between floppy eye syndrome (FES) and OSA. The aim of this study is to use STOP-BANG and FES to predict perioperative risk of complications arising from obstructive sleep apnea.

Methods: Prospective case-control study with 160 clinic participants was used in this study. Patients with known formal OSA diagnosis were excluded from the study. OSA was classified as a STOP-BANG score ≥ 3. FES was classified as grading ≥ 2. We took photographs while vertically and horizontally retracting the patient's eyes. Two blinded ophthalmologists and two blinded anesthesiologists used a graded scale to classify eyelid laxity.

Results: A total of 32.5% of patients were in the experimental OSA group and 67.5% were in the control group. FES prevalence among the OSA group was 15% and 2% among control. Ophthalmologist reviewers showed a greater incidence of FES in the OSA group compared to control (p < 0.05), while anesthesiologist reviewers did not. Ophthalmologists and anesthesiologists exhibited significant specificity (93% and 98%, respectively) and positive predictive value (88% and 86%, respectively).

Conclusions: Using FES to determine probability of OSA, as determined by the STOP-BANG questionnaire, may have utility in the perioperative setting due to its high rule-in value as shown by high specificity and positive pressure ventilation (PPV).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信