体外膜氧合并发症不是梗死相关性心源性休克患者死亡的原因:梗死相关性心源性休克(ECLS-SHOCK)试验中体外生命支持的中介分析

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Tharusan Thevathasan, Mohamad Alyahoud, Anne Freund, Ibrahim Akin, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Uwe Zeymer, Hans-Josef Feistritzer, Janine Pöss, Alexander Jobs, Michelle Roßberg, Christian Jung, Carsten Skurk, Tienush Rassaf, Taoufik Ouarrak, Steffen Schneider, Holger Thiele, Steffen Desch
{"title":"体外膜氧合并发症不是梗死相关性心源性休克患者死亡的原因:梗死相关性心源性休克(ECLS-SHOCK)试验中体外生命支持的中介分析","authors":"Tharusan Thevathasan, Mohamad Alyahoud, Anne Freund, Ibrahim Akin, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Uwe Zeymer, Hans-Josef Feistritzer, Janine Pöss, Alexander Jobs, Michelle Roßberg, Christian Jung, Carsten Skurk, Tienush Rassaf, Taoufik Ouarrak, Steffen Schneider, Holger Thiele, Steffen Desch","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recently published randomized controlled trials and an individual patient data meta-analysis showed that the routine use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) did not reduce mortality compared with medical therapy alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). The objective of this study was to investigate whether possible VA-ECMO-related medical complications are associated with increased mortality risk, which might explain the observed equipoise among mortality outcomes between VA-ECMO and usual care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sub-analysis of the randomized Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock (ECLS-SHOCK) trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multicenter, international randomized controlled trial across 44 centers specialized in treating AMI-CS.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults patients with AMI-CS.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients received either routine VA-ECMO support or medical therapy.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The rate of complications and mortality as well as causes of death within 30 days. In total, 417 patients were included in this analysis. Moderate and severe bleeding as well as peripheral vascular complications requiring intervention were classified as possible VA-ECMO-related complications. A total of 88 patients (21.1%) developed possible VA-ECMO-related complications, which mostly occurred within five days after randomization and more frequently in the VA-ECMO group than in the control group: 49 (23.4%) vs. 20 (9.6%) patients, p < 0.001 for bleeding and 23 (11.0%) vs. 8 (3.8%) patients, p equals to 0.008 for peripheral vascular complications, respectively. Only four patients died from bleeding as the primary cause of death. Causal mediation analyses revealed no significant mediation effect of possible VA-ECMO-related complications on 30-day mortality. Logistic regression analyses of possible VA-ECMO-related complications confirmed no significant associations between the frequency of VA-ECMO-related complications and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VA-ECMO use in patients with AMI-CS was associated with increased frequencies of moderate to severe bleeding as well as vascular complications warranting intervention. However, these possible VA-ECMO-related complications did not mediate an increased mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, protocol: NCT03637205; August 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complications Are Not Causal for Mortality in Patients With Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Mediation Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock (ECLS-SHOCK) Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tharusan Thevathasan, Mohamad Alyahoud, Anne Freund, Ibrahim Akin, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Uwe Zeymer, Hans-Josef Feistritzer, Janine Pöss, Alexander Jobs, Michelle Roßberg, Christian Jung, Carsten Skurk, Tienush Rassaf, Taoufik Ouarrak, Steffen Schneider, Holger Thiele, Steffen Desch\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recently published randomized controlled trials and an individual patient data meta-analysis showed that the routine use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) did not reduce mortality compared with medical therapy alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). The objective of this study was to investigate whether possible VA-ECMO-related medical complications are associated with increased mortality risk, which might explain the observed equipoise among mortality outcomes between VA-ECMO and usual care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sub-analysis of the randomized Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock (ECLS-SHOCK) trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multicenter, international randomized controlled trial across 44 centers specialized in treating AMI-CS.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults patients with AMI-CS.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients received either routine VA-ECMO support or medical therapy.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The rate of complications and mortality as well as causes of death within 30 days. In total, 417 patients were included in this analysis. Moderate and severe bleeding as well as peripheral vascular complications requiring intervention were classified as possible VA-ECMO-related complications. A total of 88 patients (21.1%) developed possible VA-ECMO-related complications, which mostly occurred within five days after randomization and more frequently in the VA-ECMO group than in the control group: 49 (23.4%) vs. 20 (9.6%) patients, p < 0.001 for bleeding and 23 (11.0%) vs. 8 (3.8%) patients, p equals to 0.008 for peripheral vascular complications, respectively. Only four patients died from bleeding as the primary cause of death. Causal mediation analyses revealed no significant mediation effect of possible VA-ECMO-related complications on 30-day mortality. Logistic regression analyses of possible VA-ECMO-related complications confirmed no significant associations between the frequency of VA-ECMO-related complications and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VA-ECMO use in patients with AMI-CS was associated with increased frequencies of moderate to severe bleeding as well as vascular complications warranting intervention. However, these possible VA-ECMO-related complications did not mediate an increased mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, protocol: NCT03637205; August 2018.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006893\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006893","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近发表的随机对照试验和个体患者数据荟萃分析显示,与单纯药物治疗相比,常规使用静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)不能降低急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克(AMI-CS)患者的死亡率。本研究的目的是调查可能的VA-ECMO相关的医学并发症是否与死亡风险增加有关,这可能解释了VA-ECMO与常规护理之间观察到的死亡率结果之间的平衡。设计:随机体外生命支持在梗死相关心源性休克(ECLS-SHOCK)试验中的亚分析。环境:多中心、国际随机对照试验,涉及44个专门治疗AMI-CS的中心。患者:AMI-CS的成人患者。干预措施:患者接受常规VA-ECMO支持或药物治疗。测量方法和主要结果:并发症发生率、死亡率及30天内死亡原因。共纳入417例患者。中度和重度出血以及需要干预的周围血管并发症被归类为可能的va - ecmo相关并发症。共有88例(21.1%)患者出现可能的VA-ECMO相关并发症,这些并发症大多发生在随机分组后5天内,VA-ECMO组的发生率高于对照组:出血49例(23.4%)vs. 20例(9.6%),p < 0.001;外周血管并发症23例(11.0%)vs. 8例(3.8%),p = 0.008。只有4名患者的主要死因是出血。因果中介分析显示,va - ecmo相关并发症对30天死亡率没有显著的中介作用。对va - ecmo相关并发症的Logistic回归分析证实,va - ecmo相关并发症的发生频率与死亡率之间无显著相关性。结论:AMI-CS患者使用VA-ECMO与中重度出血以及需要干预的血管并发症的发生率增加相关。然而,这些可能的va - ecmo相关并发症并没有增加死亡风险。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,方案:NCT03637205;2018年8月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complications Are Not Causal for Mortality in Patients With Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Mediation Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock (ECLS-SHOCK) Trial.

Objective: Recently published randomized controlled trials and an individual patient data meta-analysis showed that the routine use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) did not reduce mortality compared with medical therapy alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). The objective of this study was to investigate whether possible VA-ECMO-related medical complications are associated with increased mortality risk, which might explain the observed equipoise among mortality outcomes between VA-ECMO and usual care.

Design: Sub-analysis of the randomized Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock (ECLS-SHOCK) trial.

Setting: Multicenter, international randomized controlled trial across 44 centers specialized in treating AMI-CS.

Patients: Adults patients with AMI-CS.

Interventions: Patients received either routine VA-ECMO support or medical therapy.

Measurements and main results: The rate of complications and mortality as well as causes of death within 30 days. In total, 417 patients were included in this analysis. Moderate and severe bleeding as well as peripheral vascular complications requiring intervention were classified as possible VA-ECMO-related complications. A total of 88 patients (21.1%) developed possible VA-ECMO-related complications, which mostly occurred within five days after randomization and more frequently in the VA-ECMO group than in the control group: 49 (23.4%) vs. 20 (9.6%) patients, p < 0.001 for bleeding and 23 (11.0%) vs. 8 (3.8%) patients, p equals to 0.008 for peripheral vascular complications, respectively. Only four patients died from bleeding as the primary cause of death. Causal mediation analyses revealed no significant mediation effect of possible VA-ECMO-related complications on 30-day mortality. Logistic regression analyses of possible VA-ECMO-related complications confirmed no significant associations between the frequency of VA-ECMO-related complications and mortality.

Conclusions: VA-ECMO use in patients with AMI-CS was associated with increased frequencies of moderate to severe bleeding as well as vascular complications warranting intervention. However, these possible VA-ECMO-related complications did not mediate an increased mortality risk.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, protocol: NCT03637205; August 2018.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信