{"title":"在中国成年人中使用机器学习的特定年龄患病率和终生自杀企图的预测因素:一项全国性的多中心调查。","authors":"Yu Wu, Yihao Zhao, Panliang Zhong, Chen Chen, Yibo Wu, Xiaoying Zheng","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025100231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The epidemiology and age-specific patterns of lifetime suicide attempts (LSA) in China remain unclear. We aimed to examine age-specific prevalence and predictors of LSA among Chinese adults using machine learning (ML).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 25,047 adults in the 2024 Psychology and Behavior Investigation of Chinese Residents (PBICR-2024), stratified into three age groups (18-24, 25-44, ≥ 45 years). Thirty-seven candidate predictors across six domains-sociodemographic, physical health, mental health, lifestyle, social environment, and self-injury/suicide history-were assessed. Five ML models-random forest, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Naive Bayes-were compared. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to quantify feature importance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of LSA was 4.57% (1,145/25,047), with significant age differences: 8.10% in young adults (18-24), 4.67% in adults aged 25-44, and 2.67% in older adults (≥45). SVM achieved the best test-set performance across all ages [area under the curve (AUC) 0.88-0.94, sensitivity 0.79-0.87, specificity 0.81-0.88], showing superior calibration and net clinical benefit. SHAP analysis identified both shared and age-specific predictors. Suicidal ideation, adverse childhood experiences, and suicide disclosure were consistent top predictors across all ages. Sleep disturbances and anxiety symptoms stood out in young adults; marital status, living alone, and perceived stress in mid-life; and functional limitations, poor sleep, and depressive symptoms in older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSA prevalence in Chinese adults is relatively high, with a clear age gradient peaking in young adulthood. Risk profiles revealed both shared and age-specific predictors, reflecting distinct life-stage vulnerabilities. These findings support age-tailored suicide prevention strategies in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e52"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-specific prevalence and predictors of lifetime suicide attempts using machine learning in Chinese adults: a nationwide multi-centre survey.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Wu, Yihao Zhao, Panliang Zhong, Chen Chen, Yibo Wu, Xiaoying Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S2045796025100231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The epidemiology and age-specific patterns of lifetime suicide attempts (LSA) in China remain unclear. We aimed to examine age-specific prevalence and predictors of LSA among Chinese adults using machine learning (ML).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 25,047 adults in the 2024 Psychology and Behavior Investigation of Chinese Residents (PBICR-2024), stratified into three age groups (18-24, 25-44, ≥ 45 years). Thirty-seven candidate predictors across six domains-sociodemographic, physical health, mental health, lifestyle, social environment, and self-injury/suicide history-were assessed. Five ML models-random forest, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Naive Bayes-were compared. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to quantify feature importance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of LSA was 4.57% (1,145/25,047), with significant age differences: 8.10% in young adults (18-24), 4.67% in adults aged 25-44, and 2.67% in older adults (≥45). SVM achieved the best test-set performance across all ages [area under the curve (AUC) 0.88-0.94, sensitivity 0.79-0.87, specificity 0.81-0.88], showing superior calibration and net clinical benefit. SHAP analysis identified both shared and age-specific predictors. Suicidal ideation, adverse childhood experiences, and suicide disclosure were consistent top predictors across all ages. Sleep disturbances and anxiety symptoms stood out in young adults; marital status, living alone, and perceived stress in mid-life; and functional limitations, poor sleep, and depressive symptoms in older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSA prevalence in Chinese adults is relatively high, with a clear age gradient peaking in young adulthood. Risk profiles revealed both shared and age-specific predictors, reflecting distinct life-stage vulnerabilities. These findings support age-tailored suicide prevention strategies in China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"e52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796025100231\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796025100231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Age-specific prevalence and predictors of lifetime suicide attempts using machine learning in Chinese adults: a nationwide multi-centre survey.
Aims: The epidemiology and age-specific patterns of lifetime suicide attempts (LSA) in China remain unclear. We aimed to examine age-specific prevalence and predictors of LSA among Chinese adults using machine learning (ML).
Methods: We analyzed 25,047 adults in the 2024 Psychology and Behavior Investigation of Chinese Residents (PBICR-2024), stratified into three age groups (18-24, 25-44, ≥ 45 years). Thirty-seven candidate predictors across six domains-sociodemographic, physical health, mental health, lifestyle, social environment, and self-injury/suicide history-were assessed. Five ML models-random forest, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Naive Bayes-were compared. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to quantify feature importance.
Results: The overall prevalence of LSA was 4.57% (1,145/25,047), with significant age differences: 8.10% in young adults (18-24), 4.67% in adults aged 25-44, and 2.67% in older adults (≥45). SVM achieved the best test-set performance across all ages [area under the curve (AUC) 0.88-0.94, sensitivity 0.79-0.87, specificity 0.81-0.88], showing superior calibration and net clinical benefit. SHAP analysis identified both shared and age-specific predictors. Suicidal ideation, adverse childhood experiences, and suicide disclosure were consistent top predictors across all ages. Sleep disturbances and anxiety symptoms stood out in young adults; marital status, living alone, and perceived stress in mid-life; and functional limitations, poor sleep, and depressive symptoms in older adults.
Conclusions: LSA prevalence in Chinese adults is relatively high, with a clear age gradient peaking in young adulthood. Risk profiles revealed both shared and age-specific predictors, reflecting distinct life-stage vulnerabilities. These findings support age-tailored suicide prevention strategies in China.
期刊介绍:
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences is a prestigious international, peer-reviewed journal that has been publishing in Open Access format since 2020. Formerly known as Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale and established in 1992 by Michele Tansella, the journal prioritizes highly relevant and innovative research articles and systematic reviews in the areas of public mental health and policy, mental health services and system research, as well as epidemiological and social psychiatry. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in these critical fields.