Zhifei Zeng, Sungho Bea, Sushama K Sreedhara, Katsiaryna Bykov
{"title":"静脉血栓栓塞患者口服抗凝剂相关的非椎体骨折的比较风险。","authors":"Zhifei Zeng, Sungho Bea, Sushama K Sreedhara, Katsiaryna Bykov","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oral anticoagulants are widely used to prevent recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but studies of these drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation have raised concerns that warfarin may be associated with higher risk of fractures than direct oral anticoagulants. Using the United States administrative claims data from Medicare and Optum Clinformatics® (January 2016 - June 2024), we conducted a cohort study that emulated a 3-arm target trial of VTE patients who initiated apixaban (N = 73,668), rivaroxaban (N = 30,849), or warfarin (N = 20,872). The primary outcome was nonvertebral fractures. Propensity score matching weights were used to balance baseline covariates. Patients were followed while on treatment; intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were also conducted. Weighted HRs while on treatment were 1.12 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.41) for apixaban vs. warfarin, 1.13 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.46) for rivaroxaban vs. warfarin, and 0.92 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.22) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban. Results were consistent for ITT and other sensitivity analyses and across subgroups of age, sex, osteoporosis, and chronic kidney disease. Our findings suggest that apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin are comparable with regards to nonvertebral fracture risk when used for VTE secondary prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Risk of Nonvertebral Fractures Associated with Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.\",\"authors\":\"Zhifei Zeng, Sungho Bea, Sushama K Sreedhara, Katsiaryna Bykov\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwaf235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Oral anticoagulants are widely used to prevent recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but studies of these drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation have raised concerns that warfarin may be associated with higher risk of fractures than direct oral anticoagulants. Using the United States administrative claims data from Medicare and Optum Clinformatics® (January 2016 - June 2024), we conducted a cohort study that emulated a 3-arm target trial of VTE patients who initiated apixaban (N = 73,668), rivaroxaban (N = 30,849), or warfarin (N = 20,872). The primary outcome was nonvertebral fractures. Propensity score matching weights were used to balance baseline covariates. Patients were followed while on treatment; intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were also conducted. Weighted HRs while on treatment were 1.12 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.41) for apixaban vs. warfarin, 1.13 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.46) for rivaroxaban vs. warfarin, and 0.92 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.22) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban. Results were consistent for ITT and other sensitivity analyses and across subgroups of age, sex, osteoporosis, and chronic kidney disease. Our findings suggest that apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin are comparable with regards to nonvertebral fracture risk when used for VTE secondary prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf235\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
口服抗凝药物被广泛用于预防静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)患者的复发,但这些药物在房颤患者中的研究引起了人们的担忧,即华法林可能比直接口服抗凝药物与更高的骨折风险相关。使用美国医疗保险和Optum Clinformatics®的行政索赔数据(2016年1月至2024年6月),我们进行了一项队列研究,模拟了一项3组静脉血栓栓塞患者的目标试验,这些患者开始使用阿哌沙班(N = 73,668),利伐沙班(N = 30,849)或华法林(N = 20,872)。主要结局是非椎体骨折。倾向得分匹配权重用于平衡基线协变量。患者在治疗期间被跟踪;意向治疗(ITT)分析也进行了。阿哌沙班与华法林在治疗期间的加权hr为1.12 (95% CI 0.89 - 1.41),利伐沙班与华法林的加权hr为1.13 (95% CI 0.87 - 1.46),阿哌沙班与利伐沙班加权hr为0.92 (95% CI 0.69 - 1.22)。ITT和其他敏感性分析以及年龄、性别、骨质疏松和慢性肾脏疾病亚组的结果是一致的。我们的研究结果表明,阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和华法林用于静脉血栓栓塞二级预防时,在非椎体骨折风险方面是相当的。
Comparative Risk of Nonvertebral Fractures Associated with Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.
Oral anticoagulants are widely used to prevent recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but studies of these drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation have raised concerns that warfarin may be associated with higher risk of fractures than direct oral anticoagulants. Using the United States administrative claims data from Medicare and Optum Clinformatics® (January 2016 - June 2024), we conducted a cohort study that emulated a 3-arm target trial of VTE patients who initiated apixaban (N = 73,668), rivaroxaban (N = 30,849), or warfarin (N = 20,872). The primary outcome was nonvertebral fractures. Propensity score matching weights were used to balance baseline covariates. Patients were followed while on treatment; intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were also conducted. Weighted HRs while on treatment were 1.12 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.41) for apixaban vs. warfarin, 1.13 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.46) for rivaroxaban vs. warfarin, and 0.92 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.22) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban. Results were consistent for ITT and other sensitivity analyses and across subgroups of age, sex, osteoporosis, and chronic kidney disease. Our findings suggest that apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin are comparable with regards to nonvertebral fracture risk when used for VTE secondary prevention.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research.
It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.