静脉血栓栓塞患者口服抗凝剂相关的非椎体骨折的比较风险。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zhifei Zeng, Sungho Bea, Sushama K Sreedhara, Katsiaryna Bykov
{"title":"静脉血栓栓塞患者口服抗凝剂相关的非椎体骨折的比较风险。","authors":"Zhifei Zeng, Sungho Bea, Sushama K Sreedhara, Katsiaryna Bykov","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oral anticoagulants are widely used to prevent recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but studies of these drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation have raised concerns that warfarin may be associated with higher risk of fractures than direct oral anticoagulants. Using the United States administrative claims data from Medicare and Optum Clinformatics® (January 2016 - June 2024), we conducted a cohort study that emulated a 3-arm target trial of VTE patients who initiated apixaban (N = 73,668), rivaroxaban (N = 30,849), or warfarin (N = 20,872). The primary outcome was nonvertebral fractures. Propensity score matching weights were used to balance baseline covariates. Patients were followed while on treatment; intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were also conducted. Weighted HRs while on treatment were 1.12 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.41) for apixaban vs. warfarin, 1.13 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.46) for rivaroxaban vs. warfarin, and 0.92 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.22) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban. Results were consistent for ITT and other sensitivity analyses and across subgroups of age, sex, osteoporosis, and chronic kidney disease. Our findings suggest that apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin are comparable with regards to nonvertebral fracture risk when used for VTE secondary prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Risk of Nonvertebral Fractures Associated with Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.\",\"authors\":\"Zhifei Zeng, Sungho Bea, Sushama K Sreedhara, Katsiaryna Bykov\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwaf235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Oral anticoagulants are widely used to prevent recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but studies of these drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation have raised concerns that warfarin may be associated with higher risk of fractures than direct oral anticoagulants. Using the United States administrative claims data from Medicare and Optum Clinformatics® (January 2016 - June 2024), we conducted a cohort study that emulated a 3-arm target trial of VTE patients who initiated apixaban (N = 73,668), rivaroxaban (N = 30,849), or warfarin (N = 20,872). The primary outcome was nonvertebral fractures. Propensity score matching weights were used to balance baseline covariates. Patients were followed while on treatment; intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were also conducted. Weighted HRs while on treatment were 1.12 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.41) for apixaban vs. warfarin, 1.13 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.46) for rivaroxaban vs. warfarin, and 0.92 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.22) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban. Results were consistent for ITT and other sensitivity analyses and across subgroups of age, sex, osteoporosis, and chronic kidney disease. Our findings suggest that apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin are comparable with regards to nonvertebral fracture risk when used for VTE secondary prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf235\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口服抗凝药物被广泛用于预防静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)患者的复发,但这些药物在房颤患者中的研究引起了人们的担忧,即华法林可能比直接口服抗凝药物与更高的骨折风险相关。使用美国医疗保险和Optum Clinformatics®的行政索赔数据(2016年1月至2024年6月),我们进行了一项队列研究,模拟了一项3组静脉血栓栓塞患者的目标试验,这些患者开始使用阿哌沙班(N = 73,668),利伐沙班(N = 30,849)或华法林(N = 20,872)。主要结局是非椎体骨折。倾向得分匹配权重用于平衡基线协变量。患者在治疗期间被跟踪;意向治疗(ITT)分析也进行了。阿哌沙班与华法林在治疗期间的加权hr为1.12 (95% CI 0.89 - 1.41),利伐沙班与华法林的加权hr为1.13 (95% CI 0.87 - 1.46),阿哌沙班与利伐沙班加权hr为0.92 (95% CI 0.69 - 1.22)。ITT和其他敏感性分析以及年龄、性别、骨质疏松和慢性肾脏疾病亚组的结果是一致的。我们的研究结果表明,阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和华法林用于静脉血栓栓塞二级预防时,在非椎体骨折风险方面是相当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Risk of Nonvertebral Fractures Associated with Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.

Oral anticoagulants are widely used to prevent recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but studies of these drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation have raised concerns that warfarin may be associated with higher risk of fractures than direct oral anticoagulants. Using the United States administrative claims data from Medicare and Optum Clinformatics® (January 2016 - June 2024), we conducted a cohort study that emulated a 3-arm target trial of VTE patients who initiated apixaban (N = 73,668), rivaroxaban (N = 30,849), or warfarin (N = 20,872). The primary outcome was nonvertebral fractures. Propensity score matching weights were used to balance baseline covariates. Patients were followed while on treatment; intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were also conducted. Weighted HRs while on treatment were 1.12 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.41) for apixaban vs. warfarin, 1.13 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.46) for rivaroxaban vs. warfarin, and 0.92 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.22) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban. Results were consistent for ITT and other sensitivity analyses and across subgroups of age, sex, osteoporosis, and chronic kidney disease. Our findings suggest that apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin are comparable with regards to nonvertebral fracture risk when used for VTE secondary prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信