基于Budyko-Kaya框架的无定河流域流沙变化归因

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mingwang Zhang , Xiaomin Sun , Kuandi Zhang , Youdong Cen , Pengfei Wang
{"title":"基于Budyko-Kaya框架的无定河流域流沙变化归因","authors":"Mingwang Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaomin Sun ,&nbsp;Kuandi Zhang ,&nbsp;Youdong Cen ,&nbsp;Pengfei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Attribution analysis of runoff and sediment evolution, driven by the combined effects of climate change and human activities, remains a critical and complex challenge in contemporary hydrological research. This study integrated the Budyko elasticity method and the Kaya identity to quantify the contributions of climatic factors and underlying surface conditions to runoff and sediment changes, and to examine their spatial sensitivities and attribution differences. The results revealed significant declining trends in both runoff and sediment, with abrupt regime shifts identified in 1996 for runoff and in 2002 for sediment. The reduction in runoff was notably more pronounced. Runoff exhibited dominant periodicities of 41, 24, 12, and 5 a, while sediment displayed cycles of 47, 21, and 5 a. During the runoff change period, spatial heterogeneity in dominant driving factors was evident: underlying surface changes played a leading role in the upstream and central regions, whereas precipitation was the primary driver in the downstream areas. Across the entire basin, the contributions of <em>m</em>, <em>P</em>, and <em>E<sub>0</sub></em> to runoff changes were 65 %, 27.9 %, and 7.1 %, respectively. During the sediment change period, <em>C</em> (45.9 %) and <em>m</em> (32.8 %) were the dominant factors, while the influences of <em>P</em> (18.2 %) and <em>E<sub>0</sub></em> (3.1 %) were relatively minor. Following the regime shifts, increases in <em>P</em>, <em>E<sub>0</sub></em>, and <em>m</em> significantly influenced the evolution of runoff-sediment synchronicity. Enhanced precipitation led to asynchronous responses between runoff and sediment. Underlying surface factors affected the coupling relationship by modulating runoff generation and erosion, while potential evapotranspiration exerted contrasting effects on synchronicity across different periods. The study further revealed that precipitation was the dominant climatic driver of runoff and sediment dynamics, while the underlying surface modulated its influence pathways. Oceanic factors influenced periodic fluctuations in runoff and sediment by altering atmospheric circulation patterns. Regional soil and water conservation measures have effectively reduced runoff and sediment intensity, while evolving land use patterns have enhanced the basin’s regulatory capacity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 114293"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attribution of runoff and sediment changes in the Wuding River Basin based on the Budyko-Kaya framework\",\"authors\":\"Mingwang Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaomin Sun ,&nbsp;Kuandi Zhang ,&nbsp;Youdong Cen ,&nbsp;Pengfei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Attribution analysis of runoff and sediment evolution, driven by the combined effects of climate change and human activities, remains a critical and complex challenge in contemporary hydrological research. This study integrated the Budyko elasticity method and the Kaya identity to quantify the contributions of climatic factors and underlying surface conditions to runoff and sediment changes, and to examine their spatial sensitivities and attribution differences. The results revealed significant declining trends in both runoff and sediment, with abrupt regime shifts identified in 1996 for runoff and in 2002 for sediment. The reduction in runoff was notably more pronounced. Runoff exhibited dominant periodicities of 41, 24, 12, and 5 a, while sediment displayed cycles of 47, 21, and 5 a. During the runoff change period, spatial heterogeneity in dominant driving factors was evident: underlying surface changes played a leading role in the upstream and central regions, whereas precipitation was the primary driver in the downstream areas. Across the entire basin, the contributions of <em>m</em>, <em>P</em>, and <em>E<sub>0</sub></em> to runoff changes were 65 %, 27.9 %, and 7.1 %, respectively. During the sediment change period, <em>C</em> (45.9 %) and <em>m</em> (32.8 %) were the dominant factors, while the influences of <em>P</em> (18.2 %) and <em>E<sub>0</sub></em> (3.1 %) were relatively minor. Following the regime shifts, increases in <em>P</em>, <em>E<sub>0</sub></em>, and <em>m</em> significantly influenced the evolution of runoff-sediment synchronicity. Enhanced precipitation led to asynchronous responses between runoff and sediment. Underlying surface factors affected the coupling relationship by modulating runoff generation and erosion, while potential evapotranspiration exerted contrasting effects on synchronicity across different periods. The study further revealed that precipitation was the dominant climatic driver of runoff and sediment dynamics, while the underlying surface modulated its influence pathways. Oceanic factors influenced periodic fluctuations in runoff and sediment by altering atmospheric circulation patterns. Regional soil and water conservation measures have effectively reduced runoff and sediment intensity, while evolving land use patterns have enhanced the basin’s regulatory capacity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25012257\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25012257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在气候变化和人类活动的共同影响下,径流和沉积物演变的归因分析仍然是当代水文研究中一个关键而复杂的挑战。本研究结合Budyko弹性法和Kaya恒等,量化了气候因子和下垫面条件对径流和泥沙变化的贡献,并考察了它们的空间敏感性和归因差异。结果显示径流和泥沙都有显著的下降趋势,径流和泥沙分别在1996年和2002年发生了突变。径流量的减少更为明显。径流以41、24、12和5 a为主导周期,泥沙以47、21和5 a为主导周期。在径流变化期内,主导驱动因子的空间异质性明显,上游和中部地区下垫面变化起主导作用,而下游地区降水是主要驱动因子。在整个流域内,m、P和E0对径流变化的贡献率分别为65%、27.9%和7.1%。在沉积物变化期内,C(45.9%)和m(32.8%)是主导因子,P(18.2%)和E0(3.1%)的影响相对较小。在变化过程中,P、E0和m的增加显著影响了径流-泥沙同步性的演变。降水增强导致径流和泥沙之间的非同步响应。下垫面因子通过调节产流和侵蚀来影响耦合关系,而潜在蒸散发在不同时期对同步性的影响则存在差异。研究进一步表明,降水是径流和泥沙动态的主要气候驱动因素,而下垫面调节了其影响途径。海洋因子通过改变大气环流模式影响径流和沉积物的周期性波动。区域水土保持措施有效降低了径流和泥沙强度,而不断变化的土地利用格局增强了流域的调节能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attribution of runoff and sediment changes in the Wuding River Basin based on the Budyko-Kaya framework
Attribution analysis of runoff and sediment evolution, driven by the combined effects of climate change and human activities, remains a critical and complex challenge in contemporary hydrological research. This study integrated the Budyko elasticity method and the Kaya identity to quantify the contributions of climatic factors and underlying surface conditions to runoff and sediment changes, and to examine their spatial sensitivities and attribution differences. The results revealed significant declining trends in both runoff and sediment, with abrupt regime shifts identified in 1996 for runoff and in 2002 for sediment. The reduction in runoff was notably more pronounced. Runoff exhibited dominant periodicities of 41, 24, 12, and 5 a, while sediment displayed cycles of 47, 21, and 5 a. During the runoff change period, spatial heterogeneity in dominant driving factors was evident: underlying surface changes played a leading role in the upstream and central regions, whereas precipitation was the primary driver in the downstream areas. Across the entire basin, the contributions of m, P, and E0 to runoff changes were 65 %, 27.9 %, and 7.1 %, respectively. During the sediment change period, C (45.9 %) and m (32.8 %) were the dominant factors, while the influences of P (18.2 %) and E0 (3.1 %) were relatively minor. Following the regime shifts, increases in P, E0, and m significantly influenced the evolution of runoff-sediment synchronicity. Enhanced precipitation led to asynchronous responses between runoff and sediment. Underlying surface factors affected the coupling relationship by modulating runoff generation and erosion, while potential evapotranspiration exerted contrasting effects on synchronicity across different periods. The study further revealed that precipitation was the dominant climatic driver of runoff and sediment dynamics, while the underlying surface modulated its influence pathways. Oceanic factors influenced periodic fluctuations in runoff and sediment by altering atmospheric circulation patterns. Regional soil and water conservation measures have effectively reduced runoff and sediment intensity, while evolving land use patterns have enhanced the basin’s regulatory capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信