Sulagna Bandyopadhyay , Anjan Kumar Roy , Sarah Baker , Katherine K. Stephenson , Ximing Ge , Yuwei Wang , Khalid Bin Ahsan , Eleonor Zavala , Hasmot Ali , Rezwanul Haque , Lee Shu Fune Wu , Brooke Langevin , Mathangi Gopalakrishnan , Towfida Jahan Siddiqua , S.M. Tafsir Hasan , Parul Christian , Kerry J Schulze
{"title":"在孟加拉国农村育龄妇女和孕妇中进行的双盲、随机、对照微量营养素剂量反应(MiNDR)试验中微量营养素生物标志物的选择和测定方法及性能","authors":"Sulagna Bandyopadhyay , Anjan Kumar Roy , Sarah Baker , Katherine K. Stephenson , Ximing Ge , Yuwei Wang , Khalid Bin Ahsan , Eleonor Zavala , Hasmot Ali , Rezwanul Haque , Lee Shu Fune Wu , Brooke Langevin , Mathangi Gopalakrishnan , Towfida Jahan Siddiqua , S.M. Tafsir Hasan , Parul Christian , Kerry J Schulze","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Comprehensive documentation of micronutrient biomarker assessments, capturing status from deficiency to excess, remains limited, specifically in the context of multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) trials.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We document biomarker selection, preanalytical and analytical methods, assay performance evaluation, and biomarker interpretation for modeling the dose–response effects of MMS in 2 parallel bioefficacy trials among women of reproductive age and pregnant women in rural Bangladesh.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Blinded analysis of biomarker assays is being performed in the field and at 2 laboratories. Automated clinical chemistry analyzers are used to measure conventional serum and plasma biomarkers of vitamin D, B12, folate, iron, inflammation, iodine, and bone turnover. Plasma vitamers of A, E, B2, and B6, and urinary B1, B2, and B3 are measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). A serum mineral panel is analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Urinary iodine and functional assays for vitamin B1, B2, and B12, iron, and selenium are measured using 96-well plate methods. Point-of-care tests are performed for hemoglobin in venous blood, whereas liver and kidney function, glucose, and a lipid panel are performed in plasma.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Limits of detection and quantitation for biomarker assays are reported. Interassay coefficient of variations of quality control (QC) materials for primary outcome biomarkers are 4%–10% for automated analyzers, ICP-MS, and 96-well plate, and 2%–11% for UPLC assays, where available. Measurements of two-thirds of the primary outcome biomarkers could be evaluated using established external QC materials to ensure assay performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The detailed account of micronutrient biomarker assays in the dose–response MMS trials provides a useful framework for designing future research involving comprehensive assessments of micronutrient status in vulnerable populations. External quality assurance tools are warranted for UPLC-based B1, B2, and B3 vitamers, and for kinetic assays of B1, B2, and selenium.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"9 10","pages":"Article 107546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Micronutrient Biomarker Selection and Assay Methods and Performance in Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Micronutrient Dose Response (MiNDR) Trials among Women of Reproductive Age and Pregnant Women in Rural Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Sulagna Bandyopadhyay , Anjan Kumar Roy , Sarah Baker , Katherine K. Stephenson , Ximing Ge , Yuwei Wang , Khalid Bin Ahsan , Eleonor Zavala , Hasmot Ali , Rezwanul Haque , Lee Shu Fune Wu , Brooke Langevin , Mathangi Gopalakrishnan , Towfida Jahan Siddiqua , S.M. Tafsir Hasan , Parul Christian , Kerry J Schulze\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Comprehensive documentation of micronutrient biomarker assessments, capturing status from deficiency to excess, remains limited, specifically in the context of multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) trials.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We document biomarker selection, preanalytical and analytical methods, assay performance evaluation, and biomarker interpretation for modeling the dose–response effects of MMS in 2 parallel bioefficacy trials among women of reproductive age and pregnant women in rural Bangladesh.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Blinded analysis of biomarker assays is being performed in the field and at 2 laboratories. Automated clinical chemistry analyzers are used to measure conventional serum and plasma biomarkers of vitamin D, B12, folate, iron, inflammation, iodine, and bone turnover. Plasma vitamers of A, E, B2, and B6, and urinary B1, B2, and B3 are measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). A serum mineral panel is analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Urinary iodine and functional assays for vitamin B1, B2, and B12, iron, and selenium are measured using 96-well plate methods. Point-of-care tests are performed for hemoglobin in venous blood, whereas liver and kidney function, glucose, and a lipid panel are performed in plasma.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Limits of detection and quantitation for biomarker assays are reported. Interassay coefficient of variations of quality control (QC) materials for primary outcome biomarkers are 4%–10% for automated analyzers, ICP-MS, and 96-well plate, and 2%–11% for UPLC assays, where available. Measurements of two-thirds of the primary outcome biomarkers could be evaluated using established external QC materials to ensure assay performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The detailed account of micronutrient biomarker assays in the dose–response MMS trials provides a useful framework for designing future research involving comprehensive assessments of micronutrient status in vulnerable populations. External quality assurance tools are warranted for UPLC-based B1, B2, and B3 vitamers, and for kinetic assays of B1, B2, and selenium.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 107546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299125030082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299125030082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Micronutrient Biomarker Selection and Assay Methods and Performance in Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Micronutrient Dose Response (MiNDR) Trials among Women of Reproductive Age and Pregnant Women in Rural Bangladesh
Background
Comprehensive documentation of micronutrient biomarker assessments, capturing status from deficiency to excess, remains limited, specifically in the context of multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) trials.
Objectives
We document biomarker selection, preanalytical and analytical methods, assay performance evaluation, and biomarker interpretation for modeling the dose–response effects of MMS in 2 parallel bioefficacy trials among women of reproductive age and pregnant women in rural Bangladesh.
Methods
Blinded analysis of biomarker assays is being performed in the field and at 2 laboratories. Automated clinical chemistry analyzers are used to measure conventional serum and plasma biomarkers of vitamin D, B12, folate, iron, inflammation, iodine, and bone turnover. Plasma vitamers of A, E, B2, and B6, and urinary B1, B2, and B3 are measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). A serum mineral panel is analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Urinary iodine and functional assays for vitamin B1, B2, and B12, iron, and selenium are measured using 96-well plate methods. Point-of-care tests are performed for hemoglobin in venous blood, whereas liver and kidney function, glucose, and a lipid panel are performed in plasma.
Results
Limits of detection and quantitation for biomarker assays are reported. Interassay coefficient of variations of quality control (QC) materials for primary outcome biomarkers are 4%–10% for automated analyzers, ICP-MS, and 96-well plate, and 2%–11% for UPLC assays, where available. Measurements of two-thirds of the primary outcome biomarkers could be evaluated using established external QC materials to ensure assay performance.
Conclusions
The detailed account of micronutrient biomarker assays in the dose–response MMS trials provides a useful framework for designing future research involving comprehensive assessments of micronutrient status in vulnerable populations. External quality assurance tools are warranted for UPLC-based B1, B2, and B3 vitamers, and for kinetic assays of B1, B2, and selenium.