Fuhui Zhang , Di Li , Yuhuan Emma Zhao , Yifan Zhao
{"title":"英语学习者同伴反馈读写能力发展的纵向研究","authors":"Fuhui Zhang , Di Li , Yuhuan Emma Zhao , Yifan Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although peer feedback literacy has been increasingly evidenced as a crucial factor in enhancing learning outcomes, its conceptual dimensions and longitudinal development remain underexplored. Adopting an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the study identified core dimensions of peer feedback literacy based on 176 questionnaires, examined the development of these dimensions over one semester, and then enriched the examination through thematic analysis of peer feedback, revisions, and semi-structured interviews from six focal students. Triangulated results indicated growth in feedback-related knowledge and abilities, revision efficacy as well as sustainment of appreciation of peer feedback and negotiation agency across both high- and low-proficiency students. Key manifestations included a clearer understanding of writing skills, increased precision in diagnosing writing issues, and greater volume of revision. This study contributes to a refined conceptualization of peer feedback literacy in writing and elucidated its developmental progression. Practical implications for fostering peer feedback literacy have also been discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A longitudinal exploration of EFL learners' peer feedback literacy development\",\"authors\":\"Fuhui Zhang , Di Li , Yuhuan Emma Zhao , Yifan Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although peer feedback literacy has been increasingly evidenced as a crucial factor in enhancing learning outcomes, its conceptual dimensions and longitudinal development remain underexplored. Adopting an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the study identified core dimensions of peer feedback literacy based on 176 questionnaires, examined the development of these dimensions over one semester, and then enriched the examination through thematic analysis of peer feedback, revisions, and semi-structured interviews from six focal students. Triangulated results indicated growth in feedback-related knowledge and abilities, revision efficacy as well as sustainment of appreciation of peer feedback and negotiation agency across both high- and low-proficiency students. Key manifestations included a clearer understanding of writing skills, increased precision in diagnosing writing issues, and greater volume of revision. This study contributes to a refined conceptualization of peer feedback literacy in writing and elucidated its developmental progression. Practical implications for fostering peer feedback literacy have also been discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000793\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000793","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A longitudinal exploration of EFL learners' peer feedback literacy development
Although peer feedback literacy has been increasingly evidenced as a crucial factor in enhancing learning outcomes, its conceptual dimensions and longitudinal development remain underexplored. Adopting an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the study identified core dimensions of peer feedback literacy based on 176 questionnaires, examined the development of these dimensions over one semester, and then enriched the examination through thematic analysis of peer feedback, revisions, and semi-structured interviews from six focal students. Triangulated results indicated growth in feedback-related knowledge and abilities, revision efficacy as well as sustainment of appreciation of peer feedback and negotiation agency across both high- and low-proficiency students. Key manifestations included a clearer understanding of writing skills, increased precision in diagnosing writing issues, and greater volume of revision. This study contributes to a refined conceptualization of peer feedback literacy in writing and elucidated its developmental progression. Practical implications for fostering peer feedback literacy have also been discussed.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.