英语学习者同伴反馈读写能力发展的纵向研究

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Fuhui Zhang , Di Li , Yuhuan Emma Zhao , Yifan Zhao
{"title":"英语学习者同伴反馈读写能力发展的纵向研究","authors":"Fuhui Zhang ,&nbsp;Di Li ,&nbsp;Yuhuan Emma Zhao ,&nbsp;Yifan Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although peer feedback literacy has been increasingly evidenced as a crucial factor in enhancing learning outcomes, its conceptual dimensions and longitudinal development remain underexplored. Adopting an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the study identified core dimensions of peer feedback literacy based on 176 questionnaires, examined the development of these dimensions over one semester, and then enriched the examination through thematic analysis of peer feedback, revisions, and semi-structured interviews from six focal students. Triangulated results indicated growth in feedback-related knowledge and abilities, revision efficacy as well as sustainment of appreciation of peer feedback and negotiation agency across both high- and low-proficiency students. Key manifestations included a clearer understanding of writing skills, increased precision in diagnosing writing issues, and greater volume of revision. This study contributes to a refined conceptualization of peer feedback literacy in writing and elucidated its developmental progression. Practical implications for fostering peer feedback literacy have also been discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A longitudinal exploration of EFL learners' peer feedback literacy development\",\"authors\":\"Fuhui Zhang ,&nbsp;Di Li ,&nbsp;Yuhuan Emma Zhao ,&nbsp;Yifan Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although peer feedback literacy has been increasingly evidenced as a crucial factor in enhancing learning outcomes, its conceptual dimensions and longitudinal development remain underexplored. Adopting an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the study identified core dimensions of peer feedback literacy based on 176 questionnaires, examined the development of these dimensions over one semester, and then enriched the examination through thematic analysis of peer feedback, revisions, and semi-structured interviews from six focal students. Triangulated results indicated growth in feedback-related knowledge and abilities, revision efficacy as well as sustainment of appreciation of peer feedback and negotiation agency across both high- and low-proficiency students. Key manifestations included a clearer understanding of writing skills, increased precision in diagnosing writing issues, and greater volume of revision. This study contributes to a refined conceptualization of peer feedback literacy in writing and elucidated its developmental progression. Practical implications for fostering peer feedback literacy have also been discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000793\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000793","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管同伴反馈素养越来越多地被证明是提高学习成果的关键因素,但其概念维度和纵向发展仍未得到充分探索。本研究采用解释性顺序混合方法设计,在176份问卷的基础上确定了同伴反馈素养的核心维度,考察了这些维度在一个学期内的发展情况,然后通过对同伴反馈的专题分析、修订和对6名重点学生的半结构化访谈来丰富考试内容。三角测量结果显示,高、低水平学生在反馈相关知识和能力、复习效果以及对同伴反馈和谈判代理的欣赏方面均有增长。主要表现包括对写作技巧的更清晰的理解,对写作问题的诊断更加精确,以及更多的修改。本研究有助于对写作同伴反馈素养的概念进行精细化,并阐明其发展过程。还讨论了培养同伴反馈素养的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A longitudinal exploration of EFL learners' peer feedback literacy development
Although peer feedback literacy has been increasingly evidenced as a crucial factor in enhancing learning outcomes, its conceptual dimensions and longitudinal development remain underexplored. Adopting an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the study identified core dimensions of peer feedback literacy based on 176 questionnaires, examined the development of these dimensions over one semester, and then enriched the examination through thematic analysis of peer feedback, revisions, and semi-structured interviews from six focal students. Triangulated results indicated growth in feedback-related knowledge and abilities, revision efficacy as well as sustainment of appreciation of peer feedback and negotiation agency across both high- and low-proficiency students. Key manifestations included a clearer understanding of writing skills, increased precision in diagnosing writing issues, and greater volume of revision. This study contributes to a refined conceptualization of peer feedback literacy in writing and elucidated its developmental progression. Practical implications for fostering peer feedback literacy have also been discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信