基于XGBoost和网络分析的山地生态系统土壤质量指数

IF 6.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Jin Gao, Jiawen Zhang, Yiwei Gong, Kaiming Yang, Weici Quan, Lu Li, Yuxi Wu, Rui Wang, Hongguang Cheng
{"title":"基于XGBoost和网络分析的山地生态系统土壤质量指数","authors":"Jin Gao,&nbsp;Jiawen Zhang,&nbsp;Yiwei Gong,&nbsp;Kaiming Yang,&nbsp;Weici Quan,&nbsp;Lu Li,&nbsp;Yuxi Wu,&nbsp;Rui Wang,&nbsp;Hongguang Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil quality is essential for sustainable agriculture, environmental conservation, and food security. Mountain soils are vulnerable to erosion, water and soil loss, and other disturbances. Sampling in mountainous areas remains challenging. There is a gap in accurate, efficient, and convenient soil quality evaluation. Uncertainty persists in selecting indicators that best reflect sustainable outcomes and the ecological functions of mountain soils. This is critical for preventing degradation. This study selects the mountainous region of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau as the research area, combining soil physical, chemical, and biological properties, and using Total Data Set (TDS) and Minimal Data Set (MDS) methods, incorporating soil quality indices with and without weights (SQI<sub>w</sub> and SQI<sub>nw</sub>), to assess mountain soil quality. We used Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Network Analysis (NA), and machine learning algorithms (XGBoost) to select different soil quality indicators and weights. Notably, these methods consistently identified key indicators such as β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), available potassium (AK), soil organic matter (SOM), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), nickel (Ni), and arsenic (As), underscoring the critical roles of biological activity, nutrient availability (chemical), and heavy metal concentrations in mountain soil quality. We developed 12 SQI indices, namely: MDS-L-W-SQI<sub>PCA</sub>, MDS-NL-W-SQI<sub>PCA</sub>, MDS-L-NW-SQI<sub>PCA</sub>, MDS-NL-NW-SQI<sub>PCA</sub>, MDS-L-W-SQI<sub>NA</sub>, MDS-NL-W-SQI<sub>NA</sub>, MDS-L-NW-SQI<sub>NA</sub>, MDS-NL-NW-SQI<sub>NA</sub>, MDS-L-W-SQI<sub>XGBoost</sub>, MDS-NL-W-SQI<sub>XGBoost</sub>, MDS-L-NW-SQI<sub>XGBoost</sub>, and MDS-NL-NW-SQI<sub>XGBoost</sub>, and then compared different methods to select the best-performing model for mountain soil evaluation. The results show that the MDS-SQI constructed based on XGBoost has superior performance. The R<sup>2</sup> values for the TDS-SQI fit were 0.83, 0.85, 0.76, and 0.87. Fewer indicators improve efficiency while maintaining accuracy. The NA-based model performs better than the PCA-based one. Nonlinear scoring methods show higher sensitivity and better adapt to mountain soils. Both NA and XGBoost-based MDS-SQI exhibit higher SI and ER values. This capability is crucial for the Yunnan Jinsha River Basin, where hydropower development is ongoing. The predictive insights support soil management and address the current lack of evaluation frameworks in mountainous areas. This method reduces ambiguity in indicator selection and eclipsing errors. It provides a more scientific and reproducible framework for mountain soil quality evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"463 ","pages":"Article 117558"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A robust soil quality index for mountain ecosystems driven by XGBoost and network analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jin Gao,&nbsp;Jiawen Zhang,&nbsp;Yiwei Gong,&nbsp;Kaiming Yang,&nbsp;Weici Quan,&nbsp;Lu Li,&nbsp;Yuxi Wu,&nbsp;Rui Wang,&nbsp;Hongguang Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Soil quality is essential for sustainable agriculture, environmental conservation, and food security. Mountain soils are vulnerable to erosion, water and soil loss, and other disturbances. Sampling in mountainous areas remains challenging. There is a gap in accurate, efficient, and convenient soil quality evaluation. Uncertainty persists in selecting indicators that best reflect sustainable outcomes and the ecological functions of mountain soils. This is critical for preventing degradation. This study selects the mountainous region of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau as the research area, combining soil physical, chemical, and biological properties, and using Total Data Set (TDS) and Minimal Data Set (MDS) methods, incorporating soil quality indices with and without weights (SQI<sub>w</sub> and SQI<sub>nw</sub>), to assess mountain soil quality. We used Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Network Analysis (NA), and machine learning algorithms (XGBoost) to select different soil quality indicators and weights. Notably, these methods consistently identified key indicators such as β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), available potassium (AK), soil organic matter (SOM), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), nickel (Ni), and arsenic (As), underscoring the critical roles of biological activity, nutrient availability (chemical), and heavy metal concentrations in mountain soil quality. We developed 12 SQI indices, namely: MDS-L-W-SQI<sub>PCA</sub>, MDS-NL-W-SQI<sub>PCA</sub>, MDS-L-NW-SQI<sub>PCA</sub>, MDS-NL-NW-SQI<sub>PCA</sub>, MDS-L-W-SQI<sub>NA</sub>, MDS-NL-W-SQI<sub>NA</sub>, MDS-L-NW-SQI<sub>NA</sub>, MDS-NL-NW-SQI<sub>NA</sub>, MDS-L-W-SQI<sub>XGBoost</sub>, MDS-NL-W-SQI<sub>XGBoost</sub>, MDS-L-NW-SQI<sub>XGBoost</sub>, and MDS-NL-NW-SQI<sub>XGBoost</sub>, and then compared different methods to select the best-performing model for mountain soil evaluation. The results show that the MDS-SQI constructed based on XGBoost has superior performance. The R<sup>2</sup> values for the TDS-SQI fit were 0.83, 0.85, 0.76, and 0.87. Fewer indicators improve efficiency while maintaining accuracy. The NA-based model performs better than the PCA-based one. Nonlinear scoring methods show higher sensitivity and better adapt to mountain soils. Both NA and XGBoost-based MDS-SQI exhibit higher SI and ER values. This capability is crucial for the Yunnan Jinsha River Basin, where hydropower development is ongoing. The predictive insights support soil management and address the current lack of evaluation frameworks in mountainous areas. This method reduces ambiguity in indicator selection and eclipsing errors. It provides a more scientific and reproducible framework for mountain soil quality evaluation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoderma\",\"volume\":\"463 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoderma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125003994\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125003994","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤质量对可持续农业、环境保护和粮食安全至关重要。山地土壤易受侵蚀、水土流失和其他扰动的影响。在山区取样仍然具有挑战性。准确、高效、便捷的土壤质量评价还存在一定的差距。在选择最能反映可持续成果和山地土壤生态功能的指标方面仍然存在不确定性。这对于防止退化至关重要。本研究选择云贵高原山区为研究区,结合土壤的物理、化学和生物特性,采用Total Data Set (TDS)和Minimal Data Set (MDS)方法,结合有权和无权土壤质量指标(SQIw和SQInw)对山地土壤质量进行评价。我们使用主成分分析(PCA)、网络分析(NA)和机器学习算法(XGBoost)来选择不同的土壤质量指标和权重。值得注意的是,这些方法一致地确定了关键指标,如β-1,4-葡萄糖苷酶(BG)、速效钾(AK)、土壤有机质(SOM)、微生物生物量碳(MBC)、微生物生物量氮(MBN)、镍(Ni)和砷(as),强调了生物活性、养分有效性(化学)和重金属浓度在山地土壤质量中的关键作用。建立了12个SQI指标,分别为:MDS-L-W-SQIPCA、MDS-NL-W-SQIPCA、mds - l - nl - nw - sqipca、MDS-L-W-SQINA、MDS-L-NW-SQINA、MDS-NL-NW-SQINA、mds - l - w - nw - sqina、MDS-L-W-SQIXGBoost、MDS-L-NW-SQIXGBoost、MDS-L-NW-SQIXGBoost,并对不同方法进行比较,以选择最优的山地土壤评价模型。结果表明,基于XGBoost构建的MDS-SQI具有优越的性能。TDS-SQI拟合的R2值分别为0.83、0.85、0.76和0.87。更少的指标提高了效率,同时保持了准确性。基于na的模型比基于pca的模型性能更好。非线性评分方法对山地土壤具有较高的灵敏度和较好的适应性。基于NA和xgboost的MDS-SQI均表现出更高的SI和ER值。这种能力对正在进行水电开发的云南金沙江流域至关重要。预测性见解支持土壤管理,并解决目前山区缺乏评估框架的问题。该方法减少了指示符选择的模糊性和遮挡误差。它为山地土壤质量评价提供了一个更科学、可复制的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A robust soil quality index for mountain ecosystems driven by XGBoost and network analysis

A robust soil quality index for mountain ecosystems driven by XGBoost and network analysis
Soil quality is essential for sustainable agriculture, environmental conservation, and food security. Mountain soils are vulnerable to erosion, water and soil loss, and other disturbances. Sampling in mountainous areas remains challenging. There is a gap in accurate, efficient, and convenient soil quality evaluation. Uncertainty persists in selecting indicators that best reflect sustainable outcomes and the ecological functions of mountain soils. This is critical for preventing degradation. This study selects the mountainous region of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau as the research area, combining soil physical, chemical, and biological properties, and using Total Data Set (TDS) and Minimal Data Set (MDS) methods, incorporating soil quality indices with and without weights (SQIw and SQInw), to assess mountain soil quality. We used Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Network Analysis (NA), and machine learning algorithms (XGBoost) to select different soil quality indicators and weights. Notably, these methods consistently identified key indicators such as β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), available potassium (AK), soil organic matter (SOM), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), nickel (Ni), and arsenic (As), underscoring the critical roles of biological activity, nutrient availability (chemical), and heavy metal concentrations in mountain soil quality. We developed 12 SQI indices, namely: MDS-L-W-SQIPCA, MDS-NL-W-SQIPCA, MDS-L-NW-SQIPCA, MDS-NL-NW-SQIPCA, MDS-L-W-SQINA, MDS-NL-W-SQINA, MDS-L-NW-SQINA, MDS-NL-NW-SQINA, MDS-L-W-SQIXGBoost, MDS-NL-W-SQIXGBoost, MDS-L-NW-SQIXGBoost, and MDS-NL-NW-SQIXGBoost, and then compared different methods to select the best-performing model for mountain soil evaluation. The results show that the MDS-SQI constructed based on XGBoost has superior performance. The R2 values for the TDS-SQI fit were 0.83, 0.85, 0.76, and 0.87. Fewer indicators improve efficiency while maintaining accuracy. The NA-based model performs better than the PCA-based one. Nonlinear scoring methods show higher sensitivity and better adapt to mountain soils. Both NA and XGBoost-based MDS-SQI exhibit higher SI and ER values. This capability is crucial for the Yunnan Jinsha River Basin, where hydropower development is ongoing. The predictive insights support soil management and address the current lack of evaluation frameworks in mountainous areas. This method reduces ambiguity in indicator selection and eclipsing errors. It provides a more scientific and reproducible framework for mountain soil quality evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信