绿色基础设施构成和配置对流域径流调节的影响:一项全球荟萃分析

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Ling Liu , Zhaofang Chen , Xinghao Lu , Yuncai Wang
{"title":"绿色基础设施构成和配置对流域径流调节的影响:一项全球荟萃分析","authors":"Ling Liu ,&nbsp;Zhaofang Chen ,&nbsp;Xinghao Lu ,&nbsp;Yuncai Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green infrastructure is a resilient, nature-based approach to regulating watershed runoff. However, at the global watershed scale, quantitative understanding of how GI composition and configuration influence runoff characteristics—such as generation and concentration processes—remains inconsistent, constraining evidence-based planning for efficient runoff regulation. This study conducted a <em>meta</em>-analysis of 121 peer-reviewed studies to systematically quantify the global effects of green infrastructure composition and configuration on runoff characteristics in watersheds and to identify the sources of heterogeneity in the results. The findings indicated that in terms of green infrastructure composition, shrubland exhibited slightly stronger regulatory effects on runoff characteristics compared with forest land and grassland, and forest land significantly influenced multiple runoff indicators. Regarding green infrastructure configuration, higher patch density significantly increased runoff. Moreover, moderators—including climate, topography, soil and geological conditions, and watershed area—significantly influenced the relationship between the composition and configuration of green infrastructure and runoff characteristics. The study also identified Forest% (proportion of forest land area) thresholds for different climate zones and watershed scales, recommending a minimum of 35 % to ensure watershed ecological security. These findings provide a scientific foundation for optimizing land-use planning and runoff regulation globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"664 ","pages":"Article 134418"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of green infrastructure composition and configuration on runoff regulation in watersheds: A global meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ling Liu ,&nbsp;Zhaofang Chen ,&nbsp;Xinghao Lu ,&nbsp;Yuncai Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Green infrastructure is a resilient, nature-based approach to regulating watershed runoff. However, at the global watershed scale, quantitative understanding of how GI composition and configuration influence runoff characteristics—such as generation and concentration processes—remains inconsistent, constraining evidence-based planning for efficient runoff regulation. This study conducted a <em>meta</em>-analysis of 121 peer-reviewed studies to systematically quantify the global effects of green infrastructure composition and configuration on runoff characteristics in watersheds and to identify the sources of heterogeneity in the results. The findings indicated that in terms of green infrastructure composition, shrubland exhibited slightly stronger regulatory effects on runoff characteristics compared with forest land and grassland, and forest land significantly influenced multiple runoff indicators. Regarding green infrastructure configuration, higher patch density significantly increased runoff. Moreover, moderators—including climate, topography, soil and geological conditions, and watershed area—significantly influenced the relationship between the composition and configuration of green infrastructure and runoff characteristics. The study also identified Forest% (proportion of forest land area) thresholds for different climate zones and watershed scales, recommending a minimum of 35 % to ensure watershed ecological security. These findings provide a scientific foundation for optimizing land-use planning and runoff regulation globally.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"664 \",\"pages\":\"Article 134418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425017585\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425017585","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色基础设施是一种弹性的、以自然为基础的调节流域径流的方法。然而,在全球流域尺度上,对GI组成和配置如何影响径流特征(如生成和集中过程)的定量理解仍然不一致,这限制了基于证据的有效径流调节规划。本研究对121项同行评议的研究进行了荟萃分析,以系统地量化绿色基础设施组成和配置对流域径流特征的全球影响,并确定结果异质性的来源。研究结果表明,在绿色基础设施构成方面,灌木林地对径流特征的调节作用略强于林地和草地,林地对径流多项指标的影响显著。在绿色基础设施配置方面,斑块密度的增加显著增加了径流。此外,包括气候、地形、土壤和地质条件以及流域面积在内的调节因子显著影响了绿色基础设施组成和配置与径流特征之间的关系。研究还确定了不同气候带和流域尺度的森林%(林地面积的比例)阈值,建议最低为35%,以确保流域生态安全。这些研究结果为优化全球土地利用规划和径流调控提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of green infrastructure composition and configuration on runoff regulation in watersheds: A global meta-analysis
Green infrastructure is a resilient, nature-based approach to regulating watershed runoff. However, at the global watershed scale, quantitative understanding of how GI composition and configuration influence runoff characteristics—such as generation and concentration processes—remains inconsistent, constraining evidence-based planning for efficient runoff regulation. This study conducted a meta-analysis of 121 peer-reviewed studies to systematically quantify the global effects of green infrastructure composition and configuration on runoff characteristics in watersheds and to identify the sources of heterogeneity in the results. The findings indicated that in terms of green infrastructure composition, shrubland exhibited slightly stronger regulatory effects on runoff characteristics compared with forest land and grassland, and forest land significantly influenced multiple runoff indicators. Regarding green infrastructure configuration, higher patch density significantly increased runoff. Moreover, moderators—including climate, topography, soil and geological conditions, and watershed area—significantly influenced the relationship between the composition and configuration of green infrastructure and runoff characteristics. The study also identified Forest% (proportion of forest land area) thresholds for different climate zones and watershed scales, recommending a minimum of 35 % to ensure watershed ecological security. These findings provide a scientific foundation for optimizing land-use planning and runoff regulation globally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信