恶劣天气下考虑路段临界性的异构应急资源配置优化

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Rui Feng , Qiang Feng , Zhihao Qi , Baozhen Yao
{"title":"恶劣天气下考虑路段临界性的异构应急资源配置优化","authors":"Rui Feng ,&nbsp;Qiang Feng ,&nbsp;Zhihao Qi ,&nbsp;Baozhen Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effective deployment of emergency resources under adverse weather is critical for maintaining road network functionality and enhancing transportation resilience. However, the spatial heterogeneity of road segment criticality poses a significant challenge to efficient resource deployment. To address this challenge, this study integrates road segment criticality into the emergency resource deployment process. Specifically, road segment criticality is quantified by integrating functional, structural, and resilience-based metrics, and synthesized using an entropy-weighted method. Subsequently, a multi-objective optimization model for heterogeneous emergency resource deployment is formulated, accounting for road segment criticality and the operational characteristics of resources across distinct response phases. The model aims to achieve three objectives: minimizing construction costs, maximizing road network accessibility, and ensuring effective coverage of critical road segments. The performance of the model is evaluated through a case study on Beijing's inner 4th Ring Road under adverse weather conditions. The effects of criticality thresholds, coverage distance, and facility capacity are further investigated through computational experiments. Results demonstrate that, compared to the baseline model that excludes segment criticality, the proposed criticality-based model reduces the number of facilities by 7.27 % while the compromise solution increases the coverage of critical road segments by 32.53 %. These findings emphasize that incorporating road segment criticality into the deployment model leads to more balanced and efficient resource allocation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104444"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of heterogeneous emergency resources deployment considering road segment criticality under adverse weather\",\"authors\":\"Rui Feng ,&nbsp;Qiang Feng ,&nbsp;Zhihao Qi ,&nbsp;Baozhen Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The effective deployment of emergency resources under adverse weather is critical for maintaining road network functionality and enhancing transportation resilience. However, the spatial heterogeneity of road segment criticality poses a significant challenge to efficient resource deployment. To address this challenge, this study integrates road segment criticality into the emergency resource deployment process. Specifically, road segment criticality is quantified by integrating functional, structural, and resilience-based metrics, and synthesized using an entropy-weighted method. Subsequently, a multi-objective optimization model for heterogeneous emergency resource deployment is formulated, accounting for road segment criticality and the operational characteristics of resources across distinct response phases. The model aims to achieve three objectives: minimizing construction costs, maximizing road network accessibility, and ensuring effective coverage of critical road segments. The performance of the model is evaluated through a case study on Beijing's inner 4th Ring Road under adverse weather conditions. The effects of criticality thresholds, coverage distance, and facility capacity are further investigated through computational experiments. Results demonstrate that, compared to the baseline model that excludes segment criticality, the proposed criticality-based model reduces the number of facilities by 7.27 % while the compromise solution increases the coverage of critical road segments by 32.53 %. These findings emphasize that incorporating road segment criticality into the deployment model leads to more balanced and efficient resource allocation strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325003357\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325003357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在恶劣天气条件下有效部署应急资源对于维持路网功能和增强交通弹性至关重要。然而,道路段临界性的空间异质性对资源的有效配置提出了重大挑战。为了应对这一挑战,本研究将道路段临界性纳入应急资源部署过程。具体而言,通过整合功能、结构和基于弹性的指标来量化道路段的临界性,并使用熵加权方法进行综合。在此基础上,建立了考虑路段临界性和不同响应阶段资源运行特性的异构应急资源配置多目标优化模型。该模型旨在实现三个目标:最小化建设成本,最大化道路网络可达性,并确保关键路段的有效覆盖。以恶劣天气条件下的北京内四环为例,对模型的性能进行了评价。通过计算实验进一步研究了临界阈值、覆盖距离和设施容量的影响。结果表明,与不考虑路段临界性的基线模型相比,基于临界性的模型减少了7.27%的设施数量,而折衷方案使关键路段的覆盖范围增加了32.53%。这些发现强调,将道路段临界性纳入部署模型会导致更平衡和有效的资源分配策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of heterogeneous emergency resources deployment considering road segment criticality under adverse weather
The effective deployment of emergency resources under adverse weather is critical for maintaining road network functionality and enhancing transportation resilience. However, the spatial heterogeneity of road segment criticality poses a significant challenge to efficient resource deployment. To address this challenge, this study integrates road segment criticality into the emergency resource deployment process. Specifically, road segment criticality is quantified by integrating functional, structural, and resilience-based metrics, and synthesized using an entropy-weighted method. Subsequently, a multi-objective optimization model for heterogeneous emergency resource deployment is formulated, accounting for road segment criticality and the operational characteristics of resources across distinct response phases. The model aims to achieve three objectives: minimizing construction costs, maximizing road network accessibility, and ensuring effective coverage of critical road segments. The performance of the model is evaluated through a case study on Beijing's inner 4th Ring Road under adverse weather conditions. The effects of criticality thresholds, coverage distance, and facility capacity are further investigated through computational experiments. Results demonstrate that, compared to the baseline model that excludes segment criticality, the proposed criticality-based model reduces the number of facilities by 7.27 % while the compromise solution increases the coverage of critical road segments by 32.53 %. These findings emphasize that incorporating road segment criticality into the deployment model leads to more balanced and efficient resource allocation strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信