种族和民族社区构成和地理距离对城乡物质使用障碍治疗的影响。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sophia N D Negaro, Peiyin Hung, Gabriel A Benavidez, Olivia M Hinds, Jan M Eberth, Skylar Gross, Christina M Andrews
{"title":"种族和民族社区构成和地理距离对城乡物质使用障碍治疗的影响。","authors":"Sophia N D Negaro, Peiyin Hung, Gabriel A Benavidez, Olivia M Hinds, Jan M Eberth, Skylar Gross, Christina M Andrews","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02683-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine whether geographic driving distance to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment varies by racial/ethnic concentration of residents in urban and rural communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis at the ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) level using data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (SAMHSA) 2021 Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator. We conducted logistic regressions to examine rural-urban differences in driving distances to SUD treatment facilities among ZCTAs with a high relative concentration of a single racial/ethnic group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Urban ZCTAs with a high concentration of Black or Hispanic residents had greater odds of having a SUD treatment facility (odds ratio [OR] = 2.39, confidence interval [CI] [2.04, 2.81] and OR = 2.20, CI [1.86, 2.61], respectively), while ZCTAs with a high concentration of White and American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/AN) communities had lower odds (OR = 0.26, CI [0.23, 0.30] and OR = 0.55, CI [0.47, 0.63], respectively), compared to all other ZCTAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SUD treatment facilities, which have historically faced heavy stigmatization, are more likely to be placed in communities with a high concentration of Black and Hispanic residents. Consequently, White ZCTAs were less likely to have a SUD treatment facility nearby than other communities. This is important evidence to explore in determining whether stigmatization may play a role in treatment availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and Ethnic Community Composition and Geographic Distance to Substance Use Disorder Treatment Across the Rural and Urban Divide.\",\"authors\":\"Sophia N D Negaro, Peiyin Hung, Gabriel A Benavidez, Olivia M Hinds, Jan M Eberth, Skylar Gross, Christina M Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-025-02683-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine whether geographic driving distance to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment varies by racial/ethnic concentration of residents in urban and rural communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis at the ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) level using data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (SAMHSA) 2021 Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator. We conducted logistic regressions to examine rural-urban differences in driving distances to SUD treatment facilities among ZCTAs with a high relative concentration of a single racial/ethnic group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Urban ZCTAs with a high concentration of Black or Hispanic residents had greater odds of having a SUD treatment facility (odds ratio [OR] = 2.39, confidence interval [CI] [2.04, 2.81] and OR = 2.20, CI [1.86, 2.61], respectively), while ZCTAs with a high concentration of White and American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/AN) communities had lower odds (OR = 0.26, CI [0.23, 0.30] and OR = 0.55, CI [0.47, 0.63], respectively), compared to all other ZCTAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SUD treatment facilities, which have historically faced heavy stigmatization, are more likely to be placed in communities with a high concentration of Black and Hispanic residents. Consequently, White ZCTAs were less likely to have a SUD treatment facility nearby than other communities. This is important evidence to explore in determining whether stigmatization may play a role in treatment availability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02683-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02683-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨城市和农村社区居民的地理驾驶距离对物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗的影响是否因种族/民族密度而异。方法:我们使用来自药物滥用和精神健康服务管理局(SAMHSA) 2021年行为健康治疗服务定位器的数据,在邮政编码制表区(ZCTA)层面进行了横断面分析。我们进行了logistic回归,以检验单一种族/民族相对集中的zcta到SUD治疗设施的驾驶距离在城乡之间的差异。结果:与所有其他zcta相比,黑人或西班牙裔居民高浓度的城市zcta拥有SUD治疗设施的几率更高(比值比[or] = 2.39,置信区间[CI][2.04, 2.81]和or = 2.20,置信区间[CI][1.86, 2.61]),而白人和美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)社区高浓度的zcta拥有较低的几率(or = 0.26, CI[0.23, 0.30]和or = 0.55, CI[0.47, 0.63])。结论:历来面临严重污名化的SUD治疗设施更有可能被安置在黑人和西班牙裔居民高度集中的社区。因此,与其他社区相比,白色zcta附近不太可能有SUD治疗设施。这是确定污名化是否可能在治疗可用性中发挥作用的重要证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial and Ethnic Community Composition and Geographic Distance to Substance Use Disorder Treatment Across the Rural and Urban Divide.

Objectives: To examine whether geographic driving distance to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment varies by racial/ethnic concentration of residents in urban and rural communities.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis at the ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) level using data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (SAMHSA) 2021 Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator. We conducted logistic regressions to examine rural-urban differences in driving distances to SUD treatment facilities among ZCTAs with a high relative concentration of a single racial/ethnic group.

Results: Urban ZCTAs with a high concentration of Black or Hispanic residents had greater odds of having a SUD treatment facility (odds ratio [OR] = 2.39, confidence interval [CI] [2.04, 2.81] and OR = 2.20, CI [1.86, 2.61], respectively), while ZCTAs with a high concentration of White and American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/AN) communities had lower odds (OR = 0.26, CI [0.23, 0.30] and OR = 0.55, CI [0.47, 0.63], respectively), compared to all other ZCTAs.

Conclusions: SUD treatment facilities, which have historically faced heavy stigmatization, are more likely to be placed in communities with a high concentration of Black and Hispanic residents. Consequently, White ZCTAs were less likely to have a SUD treatment facility nearby than other communities. This is important evidence to explore in determining whether stigmatization may play a role in treatment availability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信