最优公共规划与经济增长:来自发展中国家的理论与证据

IF 1.8 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Júlio Vicente Cateia, Luc Savard
{"title":"最优公共规划与经济增长:来自发展中国家的理论与证据","authors":"Júlio Vicente Cateia,&nbsp;Luc Savard","doi":"10.1002/pa.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A highly relevant policy debate in developing countries concerns whether limited public funds should be allocated to productive infrastructure or social transfers. Following recent developments in mathematical economics (e.g., Brandl 2022), we contribute to this debate by presenting a mechanism for selecting optimal public development projects. The incentive path compatibility axiom allows identifying an acceptable project (the one that increases the agent's utility for each money spent) using the notion of dominant strategies in game theory. Funding an infrastructure investment project is preferable to directly transferring resources to households. We construct a top-down dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model and apply it to the Guinea-Bissau economy from 2014 to 2031. Evidence suggests that optimal public projects spur growth and social welfare. These results have significant policy implications for developing countries.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Public Program and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence From a Developing Country\",\"authors\":\"Júlio Vicente Cateia,&nbsp;Luc Savard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pa.70086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>A highly relevant policy debate in developing countries concerns whether limited public funds should be allocated to productive infrastructure or social transfers. Following recent developments in mathematical economics (e.g., Brandl 2022), we contribute to this debate by presenting a mechanism for selecting optimal public development projects. The incentive path compatibility axiom allows identifying an acceptable project (the one that increases the agent's utility for each money spent) using the notion of dominant strategies in game theory. Funding an infrastructure investment project is preferable to directly transferring resources to households. We construct a top-down dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model and apply it to the Guinea-Bissau economy from 2014 to 2031. Evidence suggests that optimal public projects spur growth and social welfare. These results have significant policy implications for developing countries.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Affairs\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.70086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.70086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发展中国家的一项高度相关的政策辩论涉及有限的公共资金是否应分配给生产性基础设施或社会转移。随着数理经济学的最新发展(如Brandl 2022),我们提出了一种选择最佳公共发展项目的机制,从而为这场辩论做出了贡献。激励路径兼容公理允许使用博弈论中的优势策略概念确定一个可接受的项目(即每花一笔钱就能增加代理人效用的项目)。为基础设施投资项目提供资金比将资源直接转移到家庭更可取。本文构建了一个自上而下的动态可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型,并将其应用于2014 - 2031年的几内亚比绍经济。有证据表明,最优的公共项目会刺激经济增长和社会福利。这些结果对发展中国家具有重要的政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimal Public Program and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence From a Developing Country

Optimal Public Program and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence From a Developing Country

A highly relevant policy debate in developing countries concerns whether limited public funds should be allocated to productive infrastructure or social transfers. Following recent developments in mathematical economics (e.g., Brandl 2022), we contribute to this debate by presenting a mechanism for selecting optimal public development projects. The incentive path compatibility axiom allows identifying an acceptable project (the one that increases the agent's utility for each money spent) using the notion of dominant strategies in game theory. Funding an infrastructure investment project is preferable to directly transferring resources to households. We construct a top-down dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model and apply it to the Guinea-Bissau economy from 2014 to 2031. Evidence suggests that optimal public projects spur growth and social welfare. These results have significant policy implications for developing countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Affairs
Journal of Public Affairs PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信