{"title":"基于长期EISCAT观测的CIR和CME驱动磁暴期间低空极地电离层离子上升特性","authors":"M. Takada, K. Seki, Y. Ogawa, K. Keika","doi":"10.1029/2024JA032691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We have investigated the effects of Corotating Interaction Region- (CIR-) and Coronal Mass Ejection- (CME-) driven magnetic storms on the characteristics and mechanisms of ion upflow in the low-altitude ionosphere (250–350 km). Our analysis was based on observations from the European Incoherent Scatter (EISCAT) radars at Tromsø (ILAT = ∼66<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\mathit{{}^{\\circ}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>N) and Svalbard (∼75<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\mathit{{}^{\\circ}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>N) from 1996 to 2015. The ion upflows (defined by the averaged upward ion velocity of >10 m/s) in the low-altitude ionosphere were mainly detected in the MLT sectors of 03–09 (dawnside) and 21-03 (nightside) at Tromsø during both CIR- and CME-driven magnetic storms. The ion upflows at Svalbard were not enhanced on the nightside but were remarkable on the dawnside during CIR-driven storms and were also observed on the nightside during CME-driven large storms. On the duskside (15–21 MLT), the low-altitude ion upflows were only detected at Tromsø during CME-driven large storms. Dayside (09–15 MLT) ion upflows were not detected in the low-altitude ionosphere. To investigate the generation mechanisms of low-altitude ion upflows, we compared the convection electric field, ion temperature, and electron temperature between the pre-storm time and after storm onset. The results indicate that frictional heating (Type 1 ion upflow) is dominant at Tromsø during CME-driven large storms in all MLT sectors except the dayside. Conversely, particle precipitation (Type 2 ion upflow) is dominant at Tromsø on the nightside during all magnetic storms except CME-driven large storms. Both mechanisms contribute to ion upflow during CIR-driven small storms on the dawnside of Svalbard.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"130 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA032691","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Properties of Ion Upflows in the Low-Altitude Polar Ionosphere During CIR- and CME- Driven Magnetic Storms Based on Long-Term EISCAT Observations\",\"authors\":\"M. Takada, K. Seki, Y. Ogawa, K. Keika\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JA032691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We have investigated the effects of Corotating Interaction Region- (CIR-) and Coronal Mass Ejection- (CME-) driven magnetic storms on the characteristics and mechanisms of ion upflow in the low-altitude ionosphere (250–350 km). Our analysis was based on observations from the European Incoherent Scatter (EISCAT) radars at Tromsø (ILAT = ∼66<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $\\\\mathit{{}^{\\\\circ}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>N) and Svalbard (∼75<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $\\\\mathit{{}^{\\\\circ}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>N) from 1996 to 2015. The ion upflows (defined by the averaged upward ion velocity of >10 m/s) in the low-altitude ionosphere were mainly detected in the MLT sectors of 03–09 (dawnside) and 21-03 (nightside) at Tromsø during both CIR- and CME-driven magnetic storms. The ion upflows at Svalbard were not enhanced on the nightside but were remarkable on the dawnside during CIR-driven storms and were also observed on the nightside during CME-driven large storms. On the duskside (15–21 MLT), the low-altitude ion upflows were only detected at Tromsø during CME-driven large storms. Dayside (09–15 MLT) ion upflows were not detected in the low-altitude ionosphere. To investigate the generation mechanisms of low-altitude ion upflows, we compared the convection electric field, ion temperature, and electron temperature between the pre-storm time and after storm onset. The results indicate that frictional heating (Type 1 ion upflow) is dominant at Tromsø during CME-driven large storms in all MLT sectors except the dayside. Conversely, particle precipitation (Type 2 ion upflow) is dominant at Tromsø on the nightside during all magnetic storms except CME-driven large storms. Both mechanisms contribute to ion upflow during CIR-driven small storms on the dawnside of Svalbard.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"volume\":\"130 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA032691\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA032691\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA032691","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Properties of Ion Upflows in the Low-Altitude Polar Ionosphere During CIR- and CME- Driven Magnetic Storms Based on Long-Term EISCAT Observations
We have investigated the effects of Corotating Interaction Region- (CIR-) and Coronal Mass Ejection- (CME-) driven magnetic storms on the characteristics and mechanisms of ion upflow in the low-altitude ionosphere (250–350 km). Our analysis was based on observations from the European Incoherent Scatter (EISCAT) radars at Tromsø (ILAT = ∼66N) and Svalbard (∼75N) from 1996 to 2015. The ion upflows (defined by the averaged upward ion velocity of >10 m/s) in the low-altitude ionosphere were mainly detected in the MLT sectors of 03–09 (dawnside) and 21-03 (nightside) at Tromsø during both CIR- and CME-driven magnetic storms. The ion upflows at Svalbard were not enhanced on the nightside but were remarkable on the dawnside during CIR-driven storms and were also observed on the nightside during CME-driven large storms. On the duskside (15–21 MLT), the low-altitude ion upflows were only detected at Tromsø during CME-driven large storms. Dayside (09–15 MLT) ion upflows were not detected in the low-altitude ionosphere. To investigate the generation mechanisms of low-altitude ion upflows, we compared the convection electric field, ion temperature, and electron temperature between the pre-storm time and after storm onset. The results indicate that frictional heating (Type 1 ion upflow) is dominant at Tromsø during CME-driven large storms in all MLT sectors except the dayside. Conversely, particle precipitation (Type 2 ion upflow) is dominant at Tromsø on the nightside during all magnetic storms except CME-driven large storms. Both mechanisms contribute to ion upflow during CIR-driven small storms on the dawnside of Svalbard.