一种叶子表面的真菌在切叶蜂和它们用来筑巢的植物之间起着中介作用

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-10-19 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70229
Victoria J. Luizzi, A. Elizabeth Arnold, Judith L. Bronstein
{"title":"一种叶子表面的真菌在切叶蜂和它们用来筑巢的植物之间起着中介作用","authors":"Victoria J. Luizzi,&nbsp;A. Elizabeth Arnold,&nbsp;Judith L. Bronstein","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many insects damage leaves, a phenomenon that is foundational to their impacts on terrestrial ecosystems. Leaf traits, including chemistry, shape these interactions. In turn, leaf-surface (phylloplane) microbes can act directly or in concert with leaf chemistry to influence leaf choice, especially by insects whose reproductive success is tied to prolonged contact with leaf surfaces. Leafcutter bees (<i>Megachile</i> spp.) cut disks from leaves to line their nests, with leaves and their associated microbes forming the environment in which bees' offspring develop. We hypothesized that phylloplane microbial communities act in concert with leaf chemistry to mediate interactions between the leafcutter bee <i>M. lippiae</i> and the plants they cut. We surveyed phylloplane communities on rose (<i>Rosa × hybrida</i>, Rosaceae) leaflets that were cut versus not cut by wild <i>M. lippiae</i>. Microbial communities differed between cut and non-cut leaflets, with <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. overrepresented on cut leaflets, and <i>Alternaria</i> sp. and <i>Bacillus</i> sp. overrepresented on non-cut leaflets. Then, we inoculated rose leaves in the field to test the effect of these microbial taxa on cutting. When inoculated onto rose leaves, <i>Alternaria</i> and <i>Bacillus</i> had no effect on cutting, but <i>Aspergillus</i> resulted in twice as many cuts as on sham-inoculated leaves. To test whether <i>Aspergillus</i> could protect bee nests against pathogens, we grew <i>Aspergillus</i> with two pathogenic fungi: the generalist insect pathogen <i>Beauveria bassiania</i> and three strains of <i>Ascosphaera</i> that cause chalkbrood disease in bee larvae. <i>Aspergillus</i> did not inhibit the growth of <i>Beauveria</i>, but it markedly slowed the growth of <i>Ascosphaera</i>. To clarify whether these phylloplane microbes reflect differences in leaf chemistry or are instead independent cues that influence leaf cutting, we used liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy to characterize the metabolome of cut and non-cut leaflets. Chemistry did not differ between cut and non-cut leaflets, nor did it vary as a function of microbial community composition. Our results suggest that <i>Aspergillus</i>, a common member of rose phylloplane communities, mediates interactions between leafcutter bees and roses, potentially affecting the fitness of both partners. This study reveals a previously unexplored role for phylloplane microbes in plant–insect associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A leaf-surface fungus mediates interactions between leafcutter bees and the plants they cut to line their nests\",\"authors\":\"Victoria J. Luizzi,&nbsp;A. Elizabeth Arnold,&nbsp;Judith L. Bronstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecy.70229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many insects damage leaves, a phenomenon that is foundational to their impacts on terrestrial ecosystems. Leaf traits, including chemistry, shape these interactions. In turn, leaf-surface (phylloplane) microbes can act directly or in concert with leaf chemistry to influence leaf choice, especially by insects whose reproductive success is tied to prolonged contact with leaf surfaces. Leafcutter bees (<i>Megachile</i> spp.) cut disks from leaves to line their nests, with leaves and their associated microbes forming the environment in which bees' offspring develop. We hypothesized that phylloplane microbial communities act in concert with leaf chemistry to mediate interactions between the leafcutter bee <i>M. lippiae</i> and the plants they cut. We surveyed phylloplane communities on rose (<i>Rosa × hybrida</i>, Rosaceae) leaflets that were cut versus not cut by wild <i>M. lippiae</i>. Microbial communities differed between cut and non-cut leaflets, with <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. overrepresented on cut leaflets, and <i>Alternaria</i> sp. and <i>Bacillus</i> sp. overrepresented on non-cut leaflets. Then, we inoculated rose leaves in the field to test the effect of these microbial taxa on cutting. When inoculated onto rose leaves, <i>Alternaria</i> and <i>Bacillus</i> had no effect on cutting, but <i>Aspergillus</i> resulted in twice as many cuts as on sham-inoculated leaves. To test whether <i>Aspergillus</i> could protect bee nests against pathogens, we grew <i>Aspergillus</i> with two pathogenic fungi: the generalist insect pathogen <i>Beauveria bassiania</i> and three strains of <i>Ascosphaera</i> that cause chalkbrood disease in bee larvae. <i>Aspergillus</i> did not inhibit the growth of <i>Beauveria</i>, but it markedly slowed the growth of <i>Ascosphaera</i>. To clarify whether these phylloplane microbes reflect differences in leaf chemistry or are instead independent cues that influence leaf cutting, we used liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy to characterize the metabolome of cut and non-cut leaflets. Chemistry did not differ between cut and non-cut leaflets, nor did it vary as a function of microbial community composition. Our results suggest that <i>Aspergillus</i>, a common member of rose phylloplane communities, mediates interactions between leafcutter bees and roses, potentially affecting the fitness of both partners. This study reveals a previously unexplored role for phylloplane microbes in plant–insect associations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology\",\"volume\":\"106 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70229\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多昆虫损害树叶,这一现象是它们对陆地生态系统影响的基础。包括化学成分在内的叶片特征塑造了这些相互作用。反过来,叶表面(叶面)微生物可以直接或协同叶子化学作用来影响叶子的选择,尤其是那些繁殖成功与长时间接触叶表面有关的昆虫。切叶蜂(Megachile spp.)从叶子上切下圆盘来筑巢,叶子和与之相关的微生物形成了蜜蜂后代发育的环境。我们假设叶面微生物群落与叶片化学协同作用,调解切叶蜂m.l ipiae与被切植物之间的相互作用。研究了野生野蔷薇刈割和未刈割玫瑰(Rosa × hybrida,蔷薇科)小叶的叶面群落。微生物群落在切过的小叶和未切过的小叶上存在差异,切过的小叶上以曲霉属为主,而在未切过的小叶上以交替孢属和芽孢杆菌为主。然后,我们在田间接种玫瑰叶片,测试这些微生物类群对扦插的影响。交替菌和芽孢杆菌接种在玫瑰叶片上后,对扦插无影响,但曲霉的扦插效果是假接种叶片的两倍。为了检验曲霉是否能保护蜂巢免受病原体的侵害,我们将曲霉与两种致病真菌一起培养,这两种真菌分别是百变昆虫病原体白僵菌和三种引起蜜蜂幼虫白垩病的曲霉。曲霉对白僵菌的生长没有抑制作用,但对曲霉菌的生长有明显的抑制作用。为了弄清这些叶面微生物是否反映了叶片化学的差异,还是影响叶片切割的独立线索,我们使用液相色谱-质谱法来表征切割和未切割的叶片的代谢组。切过的小叶和未切过的小叶的化学性质没有差异,微生物群落组成也没有变化。我们的研究结果表明,作为玫瑰叶面群落的一种常见成员,曲霉介导了切叶蜂和玫瑰之间的相互作用,可能会影响双方的适合度。这项研究揭示了叶面微生物在植物-昆虫关联中的一个以前未被探索的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A leaf-surface fungus mediates interactions between leafcutter bees and the plants they cut to line their nests

A leaf-surface fungus mediates interactions between leafcutter bees and the plants they cut to line their nests

Many insects damage leaves, a phenomenon that is foundational to their impacts on terrestrial ecosystems. Leaf traits, including chemistry, shape these interactions. In turn, leaf-surface (phylloplane) microbes can act directly or in concert with leaf chemistry to influence leaf choice, especially by insects whose reproductive success is tied to prolonged contact with leaf surfaces. Leafcutter bees (Megachile spp.) cut disks from leaves to line their nests, with leaves and their associated microbes forming the environment in which bees' offspring develop. We hypothesized that phylloplane microbial communities act in concert with leaf chemistry to mediate interactions between the leafcutter bee M. lippiae and the plants they cut. We surveyed phylloplane communities on rose (Rosa × hybrida, Rosaceae) leaflets that were cut versus not cut by wild M. lippiae. Microbial communities differed between cut and non-cut leaflets, with Aspergillus spp. overrepresented on cut leaflets, and Alternaria sp. and Bacillus sp. overrepresented on non-cut leaflets. Then, we inoculated rose leaves in the field to test the effect of these microbial taxa on cutting. When inoculated onto rose leaves, Alternaria and Bacillus had no effect on cutting, but Aspergillus resulted in twice as many cuts as on sham-inoculated leaves. To test whether Aspergillus could protect bee nests against pathogens, we grew Aspergillus with two pathogenic fungi: the generalist insect pathogen Beauveria bassiania and three strains of Ascosphaera that cause chalkbrood disease in bee larvae. Aspergillus did not inhibit the growth of Beauveria, but it markedly slowed the growth of Ascosphaera. To clarify whether these phylloplane microbes reflect differences in leaf chemistry or are instead independent cues that influence leaf cutting, we used liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy to characterize the metabolome of cut and non-cut leaflets. Chemistry did not differ between cut and non-cut leaflets, nor did it vary as a function of microbial community composition. Our results suggest that Aspergillus, a common member of rose phylloplane communities, mediates interactions between leafcutter bees and roses, potentially affecting the fitness of both partners. This study reveals a previously unexplored role for phylloplane microbes in plant–insect associations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信