食物还是家庭?两种鹿的肠道微生物如何对饮食和系统发育做出反应

IF 2.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70435
Katie L. Anderson, Lisa A. Shipley, Stephanie Galla, Morgan Calahan, Stephanie Berry, Stephanie Fern Hudon, Jennifer Sorenson Forbey
{"title":"食物还是家庭?两种鹿的肠道微生物如何对饮食和系统发育做出反应","authors":"Katie L. Anderson,&nbsp;Lisa A. Shipley,&nbsp;Stephanie Galla,&nbsp;Morgan Calahan,&nbsp;Stephanie Berry,&nbsp;Stephanie Fern Hudon,&nbsp;Jennifer Sorenson Forbey","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vertebrate herbivores require symbiotic gastrointestinal (GI) microbes to extract energy and nutrients from fibrous and sometimes toxic plant diets. Because GI microbes vary in their relative abundance, function, and degree of specialization, the microbial community depends on both the characteristics of plants consumed and the anatomical, physiological, and behavioral characteristics of the herbivore host. To tease apart the relative contribution of diet and herbivore phylogeny to the microbiome, we leveraged a unique study system in which mule deer (<i>Odocoileus hemionus</i>) and white-tailed deer (<i>O. virginianus</i>) had been hand-raised from neonates to adulthood in identical conditions on a pelleted ration, then transitioned over 2 weeks in the spring onto natural plant diets as they foraged together in the same habitats across summer, then transitioned back onto the pelleted ration in late summer. We determined the plant composition and nutritional quality of the deers' diets using bite count techniques and analyzed 16S rRNA genes of their feces to determine microbial diversity and composition. Our experiments demonstrated that the GI microbial community of congeneric deer responded to characteristics of both diet and deer species. Alpha and beta microbial diversity and microbial composition differed when deer consumed the pelleted ration versus natural browse and varied with other dietary characteristics including plant diversity, composition of plant functional groups, and nutritional constituents. Microbial communities of the two deer species responded differently to dietary changes, but most strongly when deer selected different natural plant diets. Despite controlling early experience, innate behavior and physiological differences between species likely influenced the GI microbiome. Our findings underscore the potential disruption in GI microbial communities with rapid diet changes and the importance of diverse, high-quality forages for wild ruminants. A better understanding of how sympatric herbivores use the same available resources is crucial for predicting the consequences of increasing overlap in wildlife distributions with climate change and human disturbances.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70435","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food or family? How gut microbes respond to diet and phylogeny in two deer species\",\"authors\":\"Katie L. Anderson,&nbsp;Lisa A. Shipley,&nbsp;Stephanie Galla,&nbsp;Morgan Calahan,&nbsp;Stephanie Berry,&nbsp;Stephanie Fern Hudon,&nbsp;Jennifer Sorenson Forbey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.70435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Vertebrate herbivores require symbiotic gastrointestinal (GI) microbes to extract energy and nutrients from fibrous and sometimes toxic plant diets. Because GI microbes vary in their relative abundance, function, and degree of specialization, the microbial community depends on both the characteristics of plants consumed and the anatomical, physiological, and behavioral characteristics of the herbivore host. To tease apart the relative contribution of diet and herbivore phylogeny to the microbiome, we leveraged a unique study system in which mule deer (<i>Odocoileus hemionus</i>) and white-tailed deer (<i>O. virginianus</i>) had been hand-raised from neonates to adulthood in identical conditions on a pelleted ration, then transitioned over 2 weeks in the spring onto natural plant diets as they foraged together in the same habitats across summer, then transitioned back onto the pelleted ration in late summer. We determined the plant composition and nutritional quality of the deers' diets using bite count techniques and analyzed 16S rRNA genes of their feces to determine microbial diversity and composition. Our experiments demonstrated that the GI microbial community of congeneric deer responded to characteristics of both diet and deer species. Alpha and beta microbial diversity and microbial composition differed when deer consumed the pelleted ration versus natural browse and varied with other dietary characteristics including plant diversity, composition of plant functional groups, and nutritional constituents. Microbial communities of the two deer species responded differently to dietary changes, but most strongly when deer selected different natural plant diets. Despite controlling early experience, innate behavior and physiological differences between species likely influenced the GI microbiome. Our findings underscore the potential disruption in GI microbial communities with rapid diet changes and the importance of diverse, high-quality forages for wild ruminants. A better understanding of how sympatric herbivores use the same available resources is crucial for predicting the consequences of increasing overlap in wildlife distributions with climate change and human disturbances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70435\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70435\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脊椎动物食草动物需要共生胃肠道(GI)微生物从纤维性和有时有毒的植物饮食中提取能量和营养。由于胃肠道微生物的相对丰度、功能和专门化程度各不相同,因此微生物群落既取决于所食用植物的特征,也取决于食草宿主的解剖、生理和行为特征。为了梳理饮食和食草动物系统发育对微生物组的相对贡献,我们利用了一个独特的研究系统,在这个系统中,骡鹿(Odocoileus hemionus)和白尾鹿(O. virginianus)在相同的条件下用颗粒饲料从新生儿人工饲养到成年,然后在春季过渡到天然植物饲料2周,因为它们在相同的栖息地一起觅食整个夏天,然后在夏末过渡到颗粒饲料。我们利用咬数技术测定了麋鹿日粮的植物组成和营养品质,并分析了它们粪便中的16S rRNA基因,以确定微生物的多样性和组成。我们的实验表明,同属鹿的胃肠道微生物群落对饮食和鹿种的特征都有响应。鹿群的α和β微生物多样性和微生物组成随饲料中植物多样性、植物功能群组成和营养成分的变化而变化。两种鹿的微生物群落对饮食变化的反应不同,但当鹿选择不同的天然植物饮食时,反应最为强烈。尽管控制着早期经验,但物种之间的先天行为和生理差异可能会影响胃肠道微生物群。我们的研究结果强调了快速饮食变化对胃肠道微生物群落的潜在破坏以及多样化、高质量饲料对野生反刍动物的重要性。更好地了解同域食草动物如何利用相同的可用资源,对于预测野生动物分布重叠增加与气候变化和人类干扰的后果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Food or family? How gut microbes respond to diet and phylogeny in two deer species

Food or family? How gut microbes respond to diet and phylogeny in two deer species

Vertebrate herbivores require symbiotic gastrointestinal (GI) microbes to extract energy and nutrients from fibrous and sometimes toxic plant diets. Because GI microbes vary in their relative abundance, function, and degree of specialization, the microbial community depends on both the characteristics of plants consumed and the anatomical, physiological, and behavioral characteristics of the herbivore host. To tease apart the relative contribution of diet and herbivore phylogeny to the microbiome, we leveraged a unique study system in which mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed deer (O. virginianus) had been hand-raised from neonates to adulthood in identical conditions on a pelleted ration, then transitioned over 2 weeks in the spring onto natural plant diets as they foraged together in the same habitats across summer, then transitioned back onto the pelleted ration in late summer. We determined the plant composition and nutritional quality of the deers' diets using bite count techniques and analyzed 16S rRNA genes of their feces to determine microbial diversity and composition. Our experiments demonstrated that the GI microbial community of congeneric deer responded to characteristics of both diet and deer species. Alpha and beta microbial diversity and microbial composition differed when deer consumed the pelleted ration versus natural browse and varied with other dietary characteristics including plant diversity, composition of plant functional groups, and nutritional constituents. Microbial communities of the two deer species responded differently to dietary changes, but most strongly when deer selected different natural plant diets. Despite controlling early experience, innate behavior and physiological differences between species likely influenced the GI microbiome. Our findings underscore the potential disruption in GI microbial communities with rapid diet changes and the importance of diverse, high-quality forages for wild ruminants. A better understanding of how sympatric herbivores use the same available resources is crucial for predicting the consequences of increasing overlap in wildlife distributions with climate change and human disturbances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信