最大化苜蓿草料在农场收获的管理实践:来自技术小组的见解

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Maria Soledad Orcasberro, Nicole Tautges, Daniel Undersander, Marta Moura Kohmann, Ines Berro, Priscila Pinto, Valentin Picasso
{"title":"最大化苜蓿草料在农场收获的管理实践:来自技术小组的见解","authors":"Maria Soledad Orcasberro,&nbsp;Nicole Tautges,&nbsp;Daniel Undersander,&nbsp;Marta Moura Kohmann,&nbsp;Ines Berro,&nbsp;Priscila Pinto,&nbsp;Valentin Picasso","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.) is essential for the US livestock industry and provides critical ecosystem services. However, a 30%–50% gap in forage harvested persists between farmers and research fields. This study surveyed 24 farmers in the US Midwest managing 38 alfalfa fields to identify practices that maximize forage harvested. Most fields were seeded in spring under vertical tillage, primarily for haylage. Fields with more than three cuts and those harvested for haylage or silage showed greater forage harvested (yield). Previous crop, type of tillage, interval between cuts, organic management, forage use, manure, sulfur (S), and potassium (K) application in the seeding year were associated with alfalfa forage harvested. Inputs in the established stand, including herbicide, boron (B), and S, further influenced productivity. Conditional inference tree analysis revealed three technological groups based on alfalfa forage harvested and management. Group 1 achieved the greatest forage harvested based on more nutrient inputs, like S, and more than three cuts for haylage and silage. Group 2 had lower forage harvested, relying more on manure than fertilizers, and with similar cutting frequency. Group 3 had the lowest forage harvested, using alfalfa for hay with fewer inputs and longer cutting intervals. Despite a relatively small sample size, these findings emphasize the importance of integrated management strategies in achieving greater alfalfa forage harvested and closing the productivity gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management practices that maximize alfalfa forage harvested on farms: Insights from technological groups\",\"authors\":\"Maria Soledad Orcasberro,&nbsp;Nicole Tautges,&nbsp;Daniel Undersander,&nbsp;Marta Moura Kohmann,&nbsp;Ines Berro,&nbsp;Priscila Pinto,&nbsp;Valentin Picasso\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.) is essential for the US livestock industry and provides critical ecosystem services. However, a 30%–50% gap in forage harvested persists between farmers and research fields. This study surveyed 24 farmers in the US Midwest managing 38 alfalfa fields to identify practices that maximize forage harvested. Most fields were seeded in spring under vertical tillage, primarily for haylage. Fields with more than three cuts and those harvested for haylage or silage showed greater forage harvested (yield). Previous crop, type of tillage, interval between cuts, organic management, forage use, manure, sulfur (S), and potassium (K) application in the seeding year were associated with alfalfa forage harvested. Inputs in the established stand, including herbicide, boron (B), and S, further influenced productivity. Conditional inference tree analysis revealed three technological groups based on alfalfa forage harvested and management. Group 1 achieved the greatest forage harvested based on more nutrient inputs, like S, and more than three cuts for haylage and silage. Group 2 had lower forage harvested, relying more on manure than fertilizers, and with similar cutting frequency. Group 3 had the lowest forage harvested, using alfalfa for hay with fewer inputs and longer cutting intervals. Despite a relatively small sample size, these findings emphasize the importance of integrated management strategies in achieving greater alfalfa forage harvested and closing the productivity gap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70177\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70177\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)对美国畜牧业至关重要,并提供关键的生态系统服务。然而,农民和研究领域之间仍然存在30%-50%的牧草收获差距。这项研究调查了美国中西部地区管理38块苜蓿田的24名农民,以确定最大限度地收获牧草的做法。大部分田地在春季播种,采用垂直耕作,主要用于放牧。超过三次刈割的田地和收获干草或青贮的田地显示出更大的牧草收获(产量)。以前的作物、耕作方式、刈割间隔、有机管理、牧草使用、肥料、硫(S)和钾(K)在播种年的施用与苜蓿牧草收获有关。已建林分的投入,包括除草剂、硼(B)和S,进一步影响了生产力。条件推理树分析揭示了苜蓿草料采收和管理的三个技术组。第1组的牧草收获量最大,这是基于更多的营养投入,如S,以及三次以上的干草和青贮。2组牧草收获量较低,更依赖于粪肥而不是化肥,且刈割频率相似。3组采草量最低,以苜蓿为干草,投入少,刈割间隔长。尽管样本量相对较小,但这些发现强调了综合管理策略在获得更多苜蓿饲料收获和缩小生产力差距方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Management practices that maximize alfalfa forage harvested on farms: Insights from technological groups

Management practices that maximize alfalfa forage harvested on farms: Insights from technological groups

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is essential for the US livestock industry and provides critical ecosystem services. However, a 30%–50% gap in forage harvested persists between farmers and research fields. This study surveyed 24 farmers in the US Midwest managing 38 alfalfa fields to identify practices that maximize forage harvested. Most fields were seeded in spring under vertical tillage, primarily for haylage. Fields with more than three cuts and those harvested for haylage or silage showed greater forage harvested (yield). Previous crop, type of tillage, interval between cuts, organic management, forage use, manure, sulfur (S), and potassium (K) application in the seeding year were associated with alfalfa forage harvested. Inputs in the established stand, including herbicide, boron (B), and S, further influenced productivity. Conditional inference tree analysis revealed three technological groups based on alfalfa forage harvested and management. Group 1 achieved the greatest forage harvested based on more nutrient inputs, like S, and more than three cuts for haylage and silage. Group 2 had lower forage harvested, relying more on manure than fertilizers, and with similar cutting frequency. Group 3 had the lowest forage harvested, using alfalfa for hay with fewer inputs and longer cutting intervals. Despite a relatively small sample size, these findings emphasize the importance of integrated management strategies in achieving greater alfalfa forage harvested and closing the productivity gap.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信