Maria Soledad Orcasberro, Nicole Tautges, Daniel Undersander, Marta Moura Kohmann, Ines Berro, Priscila Pinto, Valentin Picasso
{"title":"最大化苜蓿草料在农场收获的管理实践:来自技术小组的见解","authors":"Maria Soledad Orcasberro, Nicole Tautges, Daniel Undersander, Marta Moura Kohmann, Ines Berro, Priscila Pinto, Valentin Picasso","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.) is essential for the US livestock industry and provides critical ecosystem services. However, a 30%–50% gap in forage harvested persists between farmers and research fields. This study surveyed 24 farmers in the US Midwest managing 38 alfalfa fields to identify practices that maximize forage harvested. Most fields were seeded in spring under vertical tillage, primarily for haylage. Fields with more than three cuts and those harvested for haylage or silage showed greater forage harvested (yield). Previous crop, type of tillage, interval between cuts, organic management, forage use, manure, sulfur (S), and potassium (K) application in the seeding year were associated with alfalfa forage harvested. Inputs in the established stand, including herbicide, boron (B), and S, further influenced productivity. Conditional inference tree analysis revealed three technological groups based on alfalfa forage harvested and management. Group 1 achieved the greatest forage harvested based on more nutrient inputs, like S, and more than three cuts for haylage and silage. Group 2 had lower forage harvested, relying more on manure than fertilizers, and with similar cutting frequency. Group 3 had the lowest forage harvested, using alfalfa for hay with fewer inputs and longer cutting intervals. Despite a relatively small sample size, these findings emphasize the importance of integrated management strategies in achieving greater alfalfa forage harvested and closing the productivity gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management practices that maximize alfalfa forage harvested on farms: Insights from technological groups\",\"authors\":\"Maria Soledad Orcasberro, Nicole Tautges, Daniel Undersander, Marta Moura Kohmann, Ines Berro, Priscila Pinto, Valentin Picasso\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.) is essential for the US livestock industry and provides critical ecosystem services. However, a 30%–50% gap in forage harvested persists between farmers and research fields. This study surveyed 24 farmers in the US Midwest managing 38 alfalfa fields to identify practices that maximize forage harvested. Most fields were seeded in spring under vertical tillage, primarily for haylage. Fields with more than three cuts and those harvested for haylage or silage showed greater forage harvested (yield). Previous crop, type of tillage, interval between cuts, organic management, forage use, manure, sulfur (S), and potassium (K) application in the seeding year were associated with alfalfa forage harvested. Inputs in the established stand, including herbicide, boron (B), and S, further influenced productivity. Conditional inference tree analysis revealed three technological groups based on alfalfa forage harvested and management. Group 1 achieved the greatest forage harvested based on more nutrient inputs, like S, and more than three cuts for haylage and silage. Group 2 had lower forage harvested, relying more on manure than fertilizers, and with similar cutting frequency. Group 3 had the lowest forage harvested, using alfalfa for hay with fewer inputs and longer cutting intervals. Despite a relatively small sample size, these findings emphasize the importance of integrated management strategies in achieving greater alfalfa forage harvested and closing the productivity gap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70177\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70177\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management practices that maximize alfalfa forage harvested on farms: Insights from technological groups
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is essential for the US livestock industry and provides critical ecosystem services. However, a 30%–50% gap in forage harvested persists between farmers and research fields. This study surveyed 24 farmers in the US Midwest managing 38 alfalfa fields to identify practices that maximize forage harvested. Most fields were seeded in spring under vertical tillage, primarily for haylage. Fields with more than three cuts and those harvested for haylage or silage showed greater forage harvested (yield). Previous crop, type of tillage, interval between cuts, organic management, forage use, manure, sulfur (S), and potassium (K) application in the seeding year were associated with alfalfa forage harvested. Inputs in the established stand, including herbicide, boron (B), and S, further influenced productivity. Conditional inference tree analysis revealed three technological groups based on alfalfa forage harvested and management. Group 1 achieved the greatest forage harvested based on more nutrient inputs, like S, and more than three cuts for haylage and silage. Group 2 had lower forage harvested, relying more on manure than fertilizers, and with similar cutting frequency. Group 3 had the lowest forage harvested, using alfalfa for hay with fewer inputs and longer cutting intervals. Despite a relatively small sample size, these findings emphasize the importance of integrated management strategies in achieving greater alfalfa forage harvested and closing the productivity gap.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.