澳大利亚甲烷和氧化亚氮预算:自然和人为来源和汇的区域评估

IF 5.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yohanna Villalobos, Josep G. Canadell, Elizabeth D. Keller, Peter R. Briggs, Phillip Ford, Ian N. Harman, Timothy W. Hilton, Allison Hogikyan, Ronny Lauerwald, Damien T. Maher, Adrien Martinez, Naiqing Pan, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Judith A. Rosentreter, Marielle Saunois, Hanqin Tian, Jacob Yeo, Zhen Zhang
{"title":"澳大利亚甲烷和氧化亚氮预算:自然和人为来源和汇的区域评估","authors":"Yohanna Villalobos,&nbsp;Josep G. Canadell,&nbsp;Elizabeth D. Keller,&nbsp;Peter R. Briggs,&nbsp;Phillip Ford,&nbsp;Ian N. Harman,&nbsp;Timothy W. Hilton,&nbsp;Allison Hogikyan,&nbsp;Ronny Lauerwald,&nbsp;Damien T. Maher,&nbsp;Adrien Martinez,&nbsp;Naiqing Pan,&nbsp;Benjamin Poulter,&nbsp;Laure Resplandy,&nbsp;Judith A. Rosentreter,&nbsp;Marielle Saunois,&nbsp;Hanqin Tian,&nbsp;Jacob Yeo,&nbsp;Zhen Zhang","doi":"10.1029/2024GB008484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present the CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O budgets for anthropogenic and natural sources and sinks of Australasia (Australia and New Zealand) from 2010 to 2019 using bottom-up and top-down methods, in line with the RECCAP-2 initiative, with extensions to 2022. We show that the bottom-up CH<sub>4</sub> budget for Australasia (2010–2019) was a net source of 14.1 ± 5.5 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup>, with Australia and New Zealand contributing 84% and 16%, respectively. Anthropogenic sources contributed 55% of all CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, the rest coming from natural sources, primarily wetlands. The bottom-up N<sub>2</sub>O budget was a net source of 0.5 ± 0.3 Tg N<sub>2</sub>O yr<sup>−1</sup>, with Australia contributing the majority (92%), mainly from natural sources (82%). Australasia top-down CH<sub>4</sub> (10.4 ± 0.5 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup>) and N<sub>2</sub>O budgets (0.8 ± 0.5 Tg N<sub>2</sub>O yr<sup>−1</sup>) differ in magnitude from the bottom-up budgets but remain consistent within their uncertainties. Similar consistency is observed for Australia, while New Zealand shows significant discrepancies, particularly for N<sub>2</sub>O, where the bottom-up estimate is 71% higher than the top-down estimate. In terms of trends, bottom-up natural wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions increased in both countries between 2010 and 2019. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from enteric fermentation slightly declined in Australia but increased in New Zealand. Soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from nitrogen additions increased in both countries, with a significant rise in New Zealand driving the overall positive trend in anthropogenic emissions. These findings highlight critical sectors with large mitigation potential and the significance of monitoring natural sources for possible biogeochemical-climate feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GB008484","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methane and Nitrous Oxide Budgets for Australasia: A Regional Assessment of Natural and Anthropogenic Sources and Sinks\",\"authors\":\"Yohanna Villalobos,&nbsp;Josep G. Canadell,&nbsp;Elizabeth D. Keller,&nbsp;Peter R. Briggs,&nbsp;Phillip Ford,&nbsp;Ian N. Harman,&nbsp;Timothy W. Hilton,&nbsp;Allison Hogikyan,&nbsp;Ronny Lauerwald,&nbsp;Damien T. Maher,&nbsp;Adrien Martinez,&nbsp;Naiqing Pan,&nbsp;Benjamin Poulter,&nbsp;Laure Resplandy,&nbsp;Judith A. Rosentreter,&nbsp;Marielle Saunois,&nbsp;Hanqin Tian,&nbsp;Jacob Yeo,&nbsp;Zhen Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GB008484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We present the CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O budgets for anthropogenic and natural sources and sinks of Australasia (Australia and New Zealand) from 2010 to 2019 using bottom-up and top-down methods, in line with the RECCAP-2 initiative, with extensions to 2022. We show that the bottom-up CH<sub>4</sub> budget for Australasia (2010–2019) was a net source of 14.1 ± 5.5 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup>, with Australia and New Zealand contributing 84% and 16%, respectively. Anthropogenic sources contributed 55% of all CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, the rest coming from natural sources, primarily wetlands. The bottom-up N<sub>2</sub>O budget was a net source of 0.5 ± 0.3 Tg N<sub>2</sub>O yr<sup>−1</sup>, with Australia contributing the majority (92%), mainly from natural sources (82%). Australasia top-down CH<sub>4</sub> (10.4 ± 0.5 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup>) and N<sub>2</sub>O budgets (0.8 ± 0.5 Tg N<sub>2</sub>O yr<sup>−1</sup>) differ in magnitude from the bottom-up budgets but remain consistent within their uncertainties. Similar consistency is observed for Australia, while New Zealand shows significant discrepancies, particularly for N<sub>2</sub>O, where the bottom-up estimate is 71% higher than the top-down estimate. In terms of trends, bottom-up natural wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions increased in both countries between 2010 and 2019. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from enteric fermentation slightly declined in Australia but increased in New Zealand. Soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from nitrogen additions increased in both countries, with a significant rise in New Zealand driving the overall positive trend in anthropogenic emissions. These findings highlight critical sectors with large mitigation potential and the significance of monitoring natural sources for possible biogeochemical-climate feedback.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"volume\":\"39 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GB008484\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008484\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们根据RECCAP-2倡议,采用自下而上和自上而下的方法,提出了2010年至2019年澳大拉西亚(澳大利亚和新西兰)人为和自然源和汇的CH4和N2O预算,并将其延长至2022年。研究表明,澳大利亚(2010-2019)自下而上的CH4预算为14.1±5.5 Tg CH4 yr - 1的净来源,其中澳大利亚和新西兰分别贡献了84%和16%。人为来源贡献了所有CH4排放的55%,其余来自自然来源,主要是湿地。自下而上的N2O收支是0.5±0.3 Tg N2O年−1的净来源,澳大利亚贡献了大部分(92%),主要来自自然来源(82%)。澳大拉西亚自上而下的CH4(10.4±0.5 Tg CH4 yr - 1)和N2O预算(0.8±0.5 Tg N2O yr - 1)在量级上不同于自下而上的预算,但在其不确定性内保持一致。在澳大利亚也观察到类似的一致性,而新西兰则表现出显著的差异,特别是在N2O方面,自下而上的估算值比自上而下的估算值高71%。从趋势上看,2010 - 2019年,两国自下而上的自然湿地CH4排放均呈增加趋势。肠道发酵的CH4排放量在澳大利亚略有下降,但在新西兰有所增加。两国因添加氮而产生的土壤N2O排放量均有所增加,其中新西兰的显著增加推动了人为排放的总体积极趋势。这些发现突出了具有巨大缓解潜力的关键部门,以及监测自然来源以获得可能的生物地球化学-气候反馈的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Methane and Nitrous Oxide Budgets for Australasia: A Regional Assessment of Natural and Anthropogenic Sources and Sinks

Methane and Nitrous Oxide Budgets for Australasia: A Regional Assessment of Natural and Anthropogenic Sources and Sinks

We present the CH4 and N2O budgets for anthropogenic and natural sources and sinks of Australasia (Australia and New Zealand) from 2010 to 2019 using bottom-up and top-down methods, in line with the RECCAP-2 initiative, with extensions to 2022. We show that the bottom-up CH4 budget for Australasia (2010–2019) was a net source of 14.1 ± 5.5 Tg CH4 yr−1, with Australia and New Zealand contributing 84% and 16%, respectively. Anthropogenic sources contributed 55% of all CH4 emissions, the rest coming from natural sources, primarily wetlands. The bottom-up N2O budget was a net source of 0.5 ± 0.3 Tg N2O yr−1, with Australia contributing the majority (92%), mainly from natural sources (82%). Australasia top-down CH4 (10.4 ± 0.5 Tg CH4 yr−1) and N2O budgets (0.8 ± 0.5 Tg N2O yr−1) differ in magnitude from the bottom-up budgets but remain consistent within their uncertainties. Similar consistency is observed for Australia, while New Zealand shows significant discrepancies, particularly for N2O, where the bottom-up estimate is 71% higher than the top-down estimate. In terms of trends, bottom-up natural wetland CH4 emissions increased in both countries between 2010 and 2019. CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation slightly declined in Australia but increased in New Zealand. Soil N2O emissions from nitrogen additions increased in both countries, with a significant rise in New Zealand driving the overall positive trend in anthropogenic emissions. These findings highlight critical sectors with large mitigation potential and the significance of monitoring natural sources for possible biogeochemical-climate feedback.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信