Annemieke Hoogstad, Nienke Peters-Scheffer, Marielle Rouleaux, Liesbeth Mevissen, Anne Versluis, Robert Didden
{"title":"智力残疾个体创伤后应激障碍的筛查和评估:范围综述","authors":"Annemieke Hoogstad, Nienke Peters-Scheffer, Marielle Rouleaux, Liesbeth Mevissen, Anne Versluis, Robert Didden","doi":"10.1007/s41252-025-00441-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) often remains underdiagnosed. This review updates Daveney et al.’s (2019) review of studies on screening and assessment instruments for PTSD in these individuals.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>This review covers eight studies in which a total of five PTSD instruments are investigated. Three studies focused on individuals with mild ID and/or BIF (Impact of Event Scale-Intellectual Disabilities and Diagnostic Interview Trauma and Stressors-Intellectual Disability), two on mild to moderate ID (Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scales), and two on severe to moderate ID (Diagnostic Interview Trauma and Stressors—Severe Intellectual Disability). One study did not specify the severity of ID (International Trauma Questionnaire-Intellectual Disabilities). Most instruments focus primarily on identifying PTSD symptoms, while some also integrate the assessment of traumatic and/or stressful events.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is growing attention on PTSD assessment in individuals with ID or BIF. While most PTSD instruments have been developed for adults with mild to moderate ID or BIF, further research is needed to validate PTSD instruments in these populations. Additionally, research is needed on PTSD assessment in individuals with more severe levels of ID and in children with ID. Cross-cultural validation studies and larger sample sizes are required. Development of guidelines for PTSD screening and assessment in individuals with ID or BIF is recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36163,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders","volume":"9 3","pages":"465 - 478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41252-025-00441-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening and Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Annemieke Hoogstad, Nienke Peters-Scheffer, Marielle Rouleaux, Liesbeth Mevissen, Anne Versluis, Robert Didden\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41252-025-00441-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) often remains underdiagnosed. This review updates Daveney et al.’s (2019) review of studies on screening and assessment instruments for PTSD in these individuals.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>This review covers eight studies in which a total of five PTSD instruments are investigated. Three studies focused on individuals with mild ID and/or BIF (Impact of Event Scale-Intellectual Disabilities and Diagnostic Interview Trauma and Stressors-Intellectual Disability), two on mild to moderate ID (Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scales), and two on severe to moderate ID (Diagnostic Interview Trauma and Stressors—Severe Intellectual Disability). One study did not specify the severity of ID (International Trauma Questionnaire-Intellectual Disabilities). Most instruments focus primarily on identifying PTSD symptoms, while some also integrate the assessment of traumatic and/or stressful events.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is growing attention on PTSD assessment in individuals with ID or BIF. While most PTSD instruments have been developed for adults with mild to moderate ID or BIF, further research is needed to validate PTSD instruments in these populations. Additionally, research is needed on PTSD assessment in individuals with more severe levels of ID and in children with ID. Cross-cultural validation studies and larger sample sizes are required. Development of guidelines for PTSD screening and assessment in individuals with ID or BIF is recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"465 - 478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41252-025-00441-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41252-025-00441-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41252-025-00441-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Screening and Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review
Objectives
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) often remains underdiagnosed. This review updates Daveney et al.’s (2019) review of studies on screening and assessment instruments for PTSD in these individuals.
Methods
A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews.
Results
This review covers eight studies in which a total of five PTSD instruments are investigated. Three studies focused on individuals with mild ID and/or BIF (Impact of Event Scale-Intellectual Disabilities and Diagnostic Interview Trauma and Stressors-Intellectual Disability), two on mild to moderate ID (Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scales), and two on severe to moderate ID (Diagnostic Interview Trauma and Stressors—Severe Intellectual Disability). One study did not specify the severity of ID (International Trauma Questionnaire-Intellectual Disabilities). Most instruments focus primarily on identifying PTSD symptoms, while some also integrate the assessment of traumatic and/or stressful events.
Conclusions
There is growing attention on PTSD assessment in individuals with ID or BIF. While most PTSD instruments have been developed for adults with mild to moderate ID or BIF, further research is needed to validate PTSD instruments in these populations. Additionally, research is needed on PTSD assessment in individuals with more severe levels of ID and in children with ID. Cross-cultural validation studies and larger sample sizes are required. Development of guidelines for PTSD screening and assessment in individuals with ID or BIF is recommended.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders publishes high-quality research in the broad area of neurodevelopmental disorders across the lifespan. Study participants may include individuals with:Intellectual and developmental disabilitiesGlobal developmental delayCommunication disordersLanguage disordersSpeech sound disordersChildhood-onset fluency disorders (e.g., stuttering)Social (e.g., pragmatic) communication disordersUnspecified communication disordersAutism spectrum disorder (ASD)Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), specified and unspecifiedSpecific learning disordersMotor disordersDevelopmental coordination disordersStereotypic movement disorderTic disorders, specified and unspecifiedOther neurodevelopmental disorders, specified and unspecifiedPapers may also include studies of participants with neurodegenerative disorders that lead to a decline in intellectual functioning, including Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, corticobasal degeneration, Huntington’s disease, and progressive supranuclear palsy. The journal includes empirical, theoretical and review papers on a large variety of issues, populations, and domains, including but not limited to: diagnosis; incidence and prevalence; and educational, pharmacological, behavioral and cognitive behavioral, mindfulness, and psychosocial interventions across the life span. Animal models of basic research that inform the understanding and treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders are also welcomed. The journal is multidisciplinary and multi-theoretical, and encourages research from multiple specialties in the social sciences using quantitative and mixed-method research methodologies.