评估涉及规范行业工人氡暴露的国家监管方法概述

IF 2.9 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Trevisi, T. Bituh, A. Canoba, M. Chege, A. Cordelle, D. Chambers, N. Chambers, P. Egidi, R. Gellermann, F. Grandia, J. Hondros, C. Kunze, J. Lee, B. Michalik, F. Otoo, S. Pepin, K. N. Rovenska, R. Sapoi, P. Tchokossa, O. van Dongen
{"title":"评估涉及规范行业工人氡暴露的国家监管方法概述","authors":"R. Trevisi,&nbsp;T. Bituh,&nbsp;A. Canoba,&nbsp;M. Chege,&nbsp;A. Cordelle,&nbsp;D. Chambers,&nbsp;N. Chambers,&nbsp;P. Egidi,&nbsp;R. Gellermann,&nbsp;F. Grandia,&nbsp;J. Hondros,&nbsp;C. Kunze,&nbsp;J. Lee,&nbsp;B. Michalik,&nbsp;F. Otoo,&nbsp;S. Pepin,&nbsp;K. N. Rovenska,&nbsp;R. Sapoi,&nbsp;P. Tchokossa,&nbsp;O. van Dongen","doi":"10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06837-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>National regulations address the radiological protection of industrial processes involving Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM), each with different approach. A collection of information gathered by members of the International Radiation Protection Association task group on “NORM” helps identify key differences in regulatory strategies. The main findings indicate that, while national regulations generally implement the requirements of international standards—and, for EU Member States, the provisions of European Commission directives—and consider ICRP recommendations, the regulatory approaches and protocols for managing worker exposure to radon in workplaces involving NORM vary significantly. In most countries, industrial processes involving NORM are regulated as planned exposure situations, whereas exposure to radon in workplaces is typically managed as an existing exposure situation. When radon doses need to be assessed because requirements for planned exposure situations apply, national regulations often require that these contributions be recorded and treated separately. However, in several countries, the contribution from radon inhalation is explicitly incorporated into the total effective dose assessment. In certain cases, the calculation specifically accounts only for the radon exposure attributable to the handling of NORM, excluding background or unrelated sources. The methodology for estimating radon doses can vary significantly between countries. There is a lack of harmonisation in the physical quantities used for assessment, as well as in the values of dose conversion factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":792,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal Plus","volume":"140 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overview of national regulatory approaches to assess worker’s exposure to radon in industries involving norm\",\"authors\":\"R. Trevisi,&nbsp;T. Bituh,&nbsp;A. Canoba,&nbsp;M. Chege,&nbsp;A. Cordelle,&nbsp;D. Chambers,&nbsp;N. Chambers,&nbsp;P. Egidi,&nbsp;R. Gellermann,&nbsp;F. Grandia,&nbsp;J. Hondros,&nbsp;C. Kunze,&nbsp;J. Lee,&nbsp;B. Michalik,&nbsp;F. Otoo,&nbsp;S. Pepin,&nbsp;K. N. Rovenska,&nbsp;R. Sapoi,&nbsp;P. Tchokossa,&nbsp;O. van Dongen\",\"doi\":\"10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06837-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>National regulations address the radiological protection of industrial processes involving Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM), each with different approach. A collection of information gathered by members of the International Radiation Protection Association task group on “NORM” helps identify key differences in regulatory strategies. The main findings indicate that, while national regulations generally implement the requirements of international standards—and, for EU Member States, the provisions of European Commission directives—and consider ICRP recommendations, the regulatory approaches and protocols for managing worker exposure to radon in workplaces involving NORM vary significantly. In most countries, industrial processes involving NORM are regulated as planned exposure situations, whereas exposure to radon in workplaces is typically managed as an existing exposure situation. When radon doses need to be assessed because requirements for planned exposure situations apply, national regulations often require that these contributions be recorded and treated separately. However, in several countries, the contribution from radon inhalation is explicitly incorporated into the total effective dose assessment. In certain cases, the calculation specifically accounts only for the radon exposure attributable to the handling of NORM, excluding background or unrelated sources. The methodology for estimating radon doses can vary significantly between countries. There is a lack of harmonisation in the physical quantities used for assessment, as well as in the values of dose conversion factors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Physical Journal Plus\",\"volume\":\"140 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Physical Journal Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"4\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06837-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal Plus","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06837-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家法规涉及涉及自然发生放射性物质(NORM)的工业过程的辐射防护,每个法规都有不同的方法。国际辐射防护协会“规范”工作组成员收集的信息有助于确定监管战略的主要差异。主要研究结果表明,虽然国家法规通常执行国际标准的要求,对欧盟成员国来说,执行欧盟委员会指令的规定,并考虑ICRP的建议,但管理工作场所工人接触氡的监管方法和协议涉及NORM,差异很大。在大多数国家,涉及NORM的工业过程作为计划的接触情况加以管制,而工作场所的氡接触通常作为现有的接触情况加以管理。当由于适用计划照射情况的要求而需要评估氡剂量时,国家法规往往要求分别记录和处理这些贡献。然而,在一些国家,氡吸入的贡献被明确纳入总有效剂量评估。在某些情况下,计算只具体说明可归因于处理NORM的氡暴露,不包括背景或不相关的来源。估算氡剂量的方法在各国之间可能差别很大。在用于评估的物理量以及剂量转换因子的值方面缺乏协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overview of national regulatory approaches to assess worker’s exposure to radon in industries involving norm

National regulations address the radiological protection of industrial processes involving Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM), each with different approach. A collection of information gathered by members of the International Radiation Protection Association task group on “NORM” helps identify key differences in regulatory strategies. The main findings indicate that, while national regulations generally implement the requirements of international standards—and, for EU Member States, the provisions of European Commission directives—and consider ICRP recommendations, the regulatory approaches and protocols for managing worker exposure to radon in workplaces involving NORM vary significantly. In most countries, industrial processes involving NORM are regulated as planned exposure situations, whereas exposure to radon in workplaces is typically managed as an existing exposure situation. When radon doses need to be assessed because requirements for planned exposure situations apply, national regulations often require that these contributions be recorded and treated separately. However, in several countries, the contribution from radon inhalation is explicitly incorporated into the total effective dose assessment. In certain cases, the calculation specifically accounts only for the radon exposure attributable to the handling of NORM, excluding background or unrelated sources. The methodology for estimating radon doses can vary significantly between countries. There is a lack of harmonisation in the physical quantities used for assessment, as well as in the values of dose conversion factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The European Physical Journal Plus
The European Physical Journal Plus PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.80%
发文量
1150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of this peer-reviewed online journal are to distribute and archive all relevant material required to document, assess, validate and reconstruct in detail the body of knowledge in the physical and related sciences. The scope of EPJ Plus encompasses a broad landscape of fields and disciplines in the physical and related sciences - such as covered by the topical EPJ journals and with the explicit addition of geophysics, astrophysics, general relativity and cosmology, mathematical and quantum physics, classical and fluid mechanics, accelerator and medical physics, as well as physics techniques applied to any other topics, including energy, environment and cultural heritage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信