全模拟QCD+QED与RM123方法的比较:u型自旋窗对 \({a}_{\mu }^{\text{HVP}}\)

IF 5.5 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 Physics and Astronomy
The RC⋆ collaboration, A. Altherr, I. Campos, A. Cotellucci, R. Gruber, T. Harris, J. Komijani, F. Margari, M. K. Marinkovic, L. Parato, A. Patella, S. Rosso, N. Tantalo, P. Tavella
{"title":"全模拟QCD+QED与RM123方法的比较:u型自旋窗对 \\({a}_{\\mu }^{\\text{HVP}}\\)","authors":"The RC⋆ collaboration,&nbsp;A. Altherr,&nbsp;I. Campos,&nbsp;A. Cotellucci,&nbsp;R. Gruber,&nbsp;T. Harris,&nbsp;J. Komijani,&nbsp;F. Margari,&nbsp;M. K. Marinkovic,&nbsp;L. Parato,&nbsp;A. Patella,&nbsp;S. Rosso,&nbsp;N. Tantalo,&nbsp;P. Tavella","doi":"10.1007/JHEP10(2025)158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Electromagnetic corrections to hadronic vacuum polarization contribute significantly to the uncertainty of the Standard Model prediction of the muon anomaly, which poses conceptual and numerical challenges for ab initio lattice determinations. In this study, we compute the non-singlet contribution from intermediate Euclidean current separations in quantum chromo- and electrodynamics (QCD+QED) using <i>C</i><sup>⋆</sup> boundary conditions in two ways: either non-perturbatively by sampling the joint probability distribution directly or by perturbatively expanding from an isospin-symmetric theory. This allows us to compare the predictions and their uncertainties at a fixed lattice spacing and volume, including fully the sea quarks effects in both cases. Treating carefully the uncertainty due to tuning to the same renormalized theory with <i>N</i><sub>f</sub> = 1 + 2 + 1 quarks, albeit with unphysical masses, we find it advantageous to simulate the full QCD+QED distribution given a fixed number of samples. This study lays the ground-work for further applications of <i>C</i><sup>⋆</sup> boundary conditions to study QCD+QED at the physical point, essential for the next generation of precision tests of the Standard Model.</p>","PeriodicalId":635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of High Energy Physics","volume":"2025 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/JHEP10(2025)158.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing QCD+QED via full simulation versus the RM123 method: U-spin window contribution to \\\\({a}_{\\\\mu }^{\\\\text{HVP}}\\\\)\",\"authors\":\"The RC⋆ collaboration,&nbsp;A. Altherr,&nbsp;I. Campos,&nbsp;A. Cotellucci,&nbsp;R. Gruber,&nbsp;T. Harris,&nbsp;J. Komijani,&nbsp;F. Margari,&nbsp;M. K. Marinkovic,&nbsp;L. Parato,&nbsp;A. Patella,&nbsp;S. Rosso,&nbsp;N. Tantalo,&nbsp;P. Tavella\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/JHEP10(2025)158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Electromagnetic corrections to hadronic vacuum polarization contribute significantly to the uncertainty of the Standard Model prediction of the muon anomaly, which poses conceptual and numerical challenges for ab initio lattice determinations. In this study, we compute the non-singlet contribution from intermediate Euclidean current separations in quantum chromo- and electrodynamics (QCD+QED) using <i>C</i><sup>⋆</sup> boundary conditions in two ways: either non-perturbatively by sampling the joint probability distribution directly or by perturbatively expanding from an isospin-symmetric theory. This allows us to compare the predictions and their uncertainties at a fixed lattice spacing and volume, including fully the sea quarks effects in both cases. Treating carefully the uncertainty due to tuning to the same renormalized theory with <i>N</i><sub>f</sub> = 1 + 2 + 1 quarks, albeit with unphysical masses, we find it advantageous to simulate the full QCD+QED distribution given a fixed number of samples. This study lays the ground-work for further applications of <i>C</i><sup>⋆</sup> boundary conditions to study QCD+QED at the physical point, essential for the next generation of precision tests of the Standard Model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of High Energy Physics\",\"volume\":\"2025 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/JHEP10(2025)158.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of High Energy Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP10(2025)158\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of High Energy Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP10(2025)158","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对强子真空极化的电磁修正极大地增加了标准模型预测μ子异常的不确定性,这对从头算晶格确定提出了概念和数值上的挑战。在本研究中,我们使用C -百科边界条件以两种方式计算了量子色电动力学(QCD+QED)中中间欧氏电流分离的非单重态贡献:通过直接采样联合概率分布的非摄动方式或通过从同位旋对称理论进行摄动展开的非摄动方式。这使我们能够比较在固定晶格间距和体积下的预测及其不确定性,包括两种情况下的海夸克效应。仔细处理由于调整到具有Nf = 1 + 2 + 1夸克的相同重归一化理论而产生的不确定性,尽管具有非物理质量,我们发现在给定固定数量的样本的情况下,模拟完整的QCD+QED分布是有利的。该研究为进一步应用C -百科边界条件在物理点上研究QCD+QED奠定了基础,这对标准模型的下一代精度测试至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing QCD+QED via full simulation versus the RM123 method: U-spin window contribution to \({a}_{\mu }^{\text{HVP}}\)

Electromagnetic corrections to hadronic vacuum polarization contribute significantly to the uncertainty of the Standard Model prediction of the muon anomaly, which poses conceptual and numerical challenges for ab initio lattice determinations. In this study, we compute the non-singlet contribution from intermediate Euclidean current separations in quantum chromo- and electrodynamics (QCD+QED) using C boundary conditions in two ways: either non-perturbatively by sampling the joint probability distribution directly or by perturbatively expanding from an isospin-symmetric theory. This allows us to compare the predictions and their uncertainties at a fixed lattice spacing and volume, including fully the sea quarks effects in both cases. Treating carefully the uncertainty due to tuning to the same renormalized theory with Nf = 1 + 2 + 1 quarks, albeit with unphysical masses, we find it advantageous to simulate the full QCD+QED distribution given a fixed number of samples. This study lays the ground-work for further applications of C boundary conditions to study QCD+QED at the physical point, essential for the next generation of precision tests of the Standard Model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of High Energy Physics
Journal of High Energy Physics 物理-物理:粒子与场物理
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
46.30%
发文量
2107
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of High Energy Physics (JHEP) is to ensure fast and efficient online publication tools to the scientific community, while keeping that community in charge of every aspect of the peer-review and publication process in order to ensure the highest quality standards in the journal. Consequently, the Advisory and Editorial Boards, composed of distinguished, active scientists in the field, jointly establish with the Scientific Director the journal''s scientific policy and ensure the scientific quality of accepted articles. JHEP presently encompasses the following areas of theoretical and experimental physics: Collider Physics Underground and Large Array Physics Quantum Field Theory Gauge Field Theories Symmetries String and Brane Theory General Relativity and Gravitation Supersymmetry Mathematical Methods of Physics Mostly Solvable Models Astroparticles Statistical Field Theories Mostly Weak Interactions Mostly Strong Interactions Quantum Field Theory (phenomenology) Strings and Branes Phenomenological Aspects of Supersymmetry Mostly Strong Interactions (phenomenology).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信