三氯乙酸治疗太阳斑的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Mohammed Munshi, Mohammed Alahmadi, Sara Alghamdi, Dalia Alanazi, Joud Alrashoud, Rudhab Alrizqi, Shikhah Alomran, Taif Alshehri, Rahaf Alshehri
{"title":"三氯乙酸治疗太阳斑的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Mohammed Munshi,&nbsp;Mohammed Alahmadi,&nbsp;Sara Alghamdi,&nbsp;Dalia Alanazi,&nbsp;Joud Alrashoud,&nbsp;Rudhab Alrizqi,&nbsp;Shikhah Alomran,&nbsp;Taif Alshehri,&nbsp;Rahaf Alshehri","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04438-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Solar lentigo is a common benign pigmented skin lesion from chronic sun exposure, particularly in aging populations. Various treatment modalities, including chemical peels, cryotherapy, and laser therapy, have improved its appearance. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) is widely used for its exfoliative and pigment-reducing effects, but its efficacy and safety compared to other treatment options remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCA in treating solar lentigo. While some included studies compare TCA with alternative treatment modalities, others focus solely on TCA outcomes. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing the use of TCA for solar lentigo treatment were identified from multiple databases. Data on study design, patient demographics, intervention characteristics—including TCA strength, number of treatments, and downtime between sessions—and treatment outcomes were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence of clinical improvement, complete lesion clearance, and adverse events associated with TCA treatment. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I² statistic. A total of 13 studies were included, comprising various study designs with follow-up durations ranging from 4 to 26 weeks. The pooled prevalence of clinical improvement with TCA treatment was 80.8% (95% CI: 73.1–88.4, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), indicating a high effectiveness rate. However, the prevalence of complete lesion clearance was 24.8% (95% CI: -5.4–55.0, <i>p</i> = 0.107), suggesting that while TCA significantly improves lesion appearance, total clearance is less frequent. The prevalence of adverse effects, including erythema and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, was 17.9% (95% CI: 4.1–31.6, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Efficacy and side effects appeared influenced by the TCA concentration, number of applications, and treatment intervals. TCA is an effective treatment option for solar lentigo, demonstrating a high rate of clinical improvement. However, complete lesion clearance remains limited, and adverse effects are notable, particularly in patients with darker skin tones. The variability in treatment outcomes observed across studies may be attributed to differences in treatment protocols, including TCA strength, number of treatments, skin phototypes, lesion locations, and practitioner experience. Standardized treatment protocols and further randomized controlled trials are needed to optimize efficacy while minimizing risks. Combination therapies may enhance outcomes and warrant further investigation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy and safety of trichloroacetic acid in the treatment of solar lentigo: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Munshi,&nbsp;Mohammed Alahmadi,&nbsp;Sara Alghamdi,&nbsp;Dalia Alanazi,&nbsp;Joud Alrashoud,&nbsp;Rudhab Alrizqi,&nbsp;Shikhah Alomran,&nbsp;Taif Alshehri,&nbsp;Rahaf Alshehri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00403-025-04438-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Solar lentigo is a common benign pigmented skin lesion from chronic sun exposure, particularly in aging populations. Various treatment modalities, including chemical peels, cryotherapy, and laser therapy, have improved its appearance. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) is widely used for its exfoliative and pigment-reducing effects, but its efficacy and safety compared to other treatment options remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCA in treating solar lentigo. While some included studies compare TCA with alternative treatment modalities, others focus solely on TCA outcomes. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing the use of TCA for solar lentigo treatment were identified from multiple databases. Data on study design, patient demographics, intervention characteristics—including TCA strength, number of treatments, and downtime between sessions—and treatment outcomes were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence of clinical improvement, complete lesion clearance, and adverse events associated with TCA treatment. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I² statistic. A total of 13 studies were included, comprising various study designs with follow-up durations ranging from 4 to 26 weeks. The pooled prevalence of clinical improvement with TCA treatment was 80.8% (95% CI: 73.1–88.4, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), indicating a high effectiveness rate. However, the prevalence of complete lesion clearance was 24.8% (95% CI: -5.4–55.0, <i>p</i> = 0.107), suggesting that while TCA significantly improves lesion appearance, total clearance is less frequent. The prevalence of adverse effects, including erythema and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, was 17.9% (95% CI: 4.1–31.6, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Efficacy and side effects appeared influenced by the TCA concentration, number of applications, and treatment intervals. TCA is an effective treatment option for solar lentigo, demonstrating a high rate of clinical improvement. However, complete lesion clearance remains limited, and adverse effects are notable, particularly in patients with darker skin tones. The variability in treatment outcomes observed across studies may be attributed to differences in treatment protocols, including TCA strength, number of treatments, skin phototypes, lesion locations, and practitioner experience. Standardized treatment protocols and further randomized controlled trials are needed to optimize efficacy while minimizing risks. Combination therapies may enhance outcomes and warrant further investigation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"volume\":\"317 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04438-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04438-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

太阳色斑是一种常见的良性色素皮肤病变,长期暴露在阳光下,特别是在老年人。各种治疗方式,包括化学换肤、冷冻疗法和激光疗法,已经改善了它的外观。三氯乙酸(TCA)因其去角质和减少色素的作用而被广泛使用,但与其他治疗方案相比,其有效性和安全性尚不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评价TCA治疗太阳色斑的疗效和安全性。虽然一些纳入的研究比较了TCA与其他治疗方式,但其他研究仅关注TCA的结果。按照PRISMA的指导方针进行了系统的审查。从多个数据库中确定了评估TCA用于太阳透镜体治疗的研究。提取了有关研究设计、患者人口统计学、干预特征(包括TCA强度、治疗次数和治疗间隔时间)和治疗结果的数据。进行了一项荟萃分析,以估计与TCA治疗相关的临床改善、完全病变清除和不良事件的总发生率。采用I²统计量评估研究间的异质性。共纳入13项研究,包括不同的研究设计,随访时间为4至26周。TCA治疗后临床改善的总发生率为80.8% (95% CI: 73.1-88.4, p < 0.001),表明有效率高。然而,病变完全清除率为24.8% (95% CI: -5.4-55.0, p = 0.107),表明TCA虽然能显著改善病变外观,但完全清除率较少。包括红斑和炎症后色素沉着在内的不良反应发生率为17.9% (95% CI: 4.1-31.6, p = 0.011)。TCA浓度、应用次数和治疗间隔对疗效和副作用有影响。TCA是一种有效的治疗选择太阳色斑,显示出高的临床改善率。然而,完全清除病变仍然有限,副作用明显,特别是在肤色较深的患者中。研究中观察到的治疗结果的可变性可能归因于治疗方案的差异,包括TCA强度、治疗次数、皮肤光型、病变位置和医生经验。需要标准化的治疗方案和进一步的随机对照试验来优化疗效,同时将风险降到最低。联合治疗可提高疗效,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The efficacy and safety of trichloroacetic acid in the treatment of solar lentigo: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The efficacy and safety of trichloroacetic acid in the treatment of solar lentigo: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Solar lentigo is a common benign pigmented skin lesion from chronic sun exposure, particularly in aging populations. Various treatment modalities, including chemical peels, cryotherapy, and laser therapy, have improved its appearance. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) is widely used for its exfoliative and pigment-reducing effects, but its efficacy and safety compared to other treatment options remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCA in treating solar lentigo. While some included studies compare TCA with alternative treatment modalities, others focus solely on TCA outcomes. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing the use of TCA for solar lentigo treatment were identified from multiple databases. Data on study design, patient demographics, intervention characteristics—including TCA strength, number of treatments, and downtime between sessions—and treatment outcomes were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence of clinical improvement, complete lesion clearance, and adverse events associated with TCA treatment. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I² statistic. A total of 13 studies were included, comprising various study designs with follow-up durations ranging from 4 to 26 weeks. The pooled prevalence of clinical improvement with TCA treatment was 80.8% (95% CI: 73.1–88.4, p < 0.001), indicating a high effectiveness rate. However, the prevalence of complete lesion clearance was 24.8% (95% CI: -5.4–55.0, p = 0.107), suggesting that while TCA significantly improves lesion appearance, total clearance is less frequent. The prevalence of adverse effects, including erythema and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, was 17.9% (95% CI: 4.1–31.6, p = 0.011). Efficacy and side effects appeared influenced by the TCA concentration, number of applications, and treatment intervals. TCA is an effective treatment option for solar lentigo, demonstrating a high rate of clinical improvement. However, complete lesion clearance remains limited, and adverse effects are notable, particularly in patients with darker skin tones. The variability in treatment outcomes observed across studies may be attributed to differences in treatment protocols, including TCA strength, number of treatments, skin phototypes, lesion locations, and practitioner experience. Standardized treatment protocols and further randomized controlled trials are needed to optimize efficacy while minimizing risks. Combination therapies may enhance outcomes and warrant further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信