地理模拟模型学术影响力指标评价报告(2023年)

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Dichen Liu , Fengyuan Zhang , Kai Xu , Daniel P. Ames , Albert J. Kettner , C. Michael Barton , Anthony J. Jakeman , Min Chen
{"title":"地理模拟模型学术影响力指标评价报告(2023年)","authors":"Dichen Liu ,&nbsp;Fengyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Kai Xu ,&nbsp;Daniel P. Ames ,&nbsp;Albert J. Kettner ,&nbsp;C. Michael Barton ,&nbsp;Anthony J. Jakeman ,&nbsp;Min Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the availability and number of geographic simulation models across various domains have surged, evaluating their relative value has become increasingly challenging. Traditional model evaluation typically involves comparing simulation results with measured data or outputs from other models. In contrast to these traditional approaches, this report continues the application of the “Model Academic Influence Index (MAI)” method from the previous year, which assesses the relative value of the model from the perspective of academic influence, emphasizing its academic contributions. We evaluate the MAI of 207 models and 22 methods collected from credible digital repositories in 2023 and establish a model leaderboard. Based on this ranking, we briefly explore the proportional representation of open-source versus closed-source models and further investigate the distribution of models across different open-source licenses. These findings provide support for model selection and optimization within the academic community and beyond, while offering new insights into the development of the open-source ecosystem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":310,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Modelling & Software","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 106737"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic influence index evaluation report of geographic simulation models (2023)\",\"authors\":\"Dichen Liu ,&nbsp;Fengyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Kai Xu ,&nbsp;Daniel P. Ames ,&nbsp;Albert J. Kettner ,&nbsp;C. Michael Barton ,&nbsp;Anthony J. Jakeman ,&nbsp;Min Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the availability and number of geographic simulation models across various domains have surged, evaluating their relative value has become increasingly challenging. Traditional model evaluation typically involves comparing simulation results with measured data or outputs from other models. In contrast to these traditional approaches, this report continues the application of the “Model Academic Influence Index (MAI)” method from the previous year, which assesses the relative value of the model from the perspective of academic influence, emphasizing its academic contributions. We evaluate the MAI of 207 models and 22 methods collected from credible digital repositories in 2023 and establish a model leaderboard. Based on this ranking, we briefly explore the proportional representation of open-source versus closed-source models and further investigate the distribution of models across different open-source licenses. These findings provide support for model selection and optimization within the academic community and beyond, while offering new insights into the development of the open-source ecosystem.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Modelling & Software\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Modelling & Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815225004219\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Modelling & Software","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815225004219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着地理模拟模型在各个领域的可用性和数量的激增,评估它们的相对价值变得越来越具有挑战性。传统的模型评估通常涉及将模拟结果与测量数据或其他模型的输出进行比较。与这些传统方法相比,本报告延续了上一年的“模型学术影响力指数(MAI)”方法,从学术影响力的角度评估模型的相对价值,强调其学术贡献。我们评估了2023年从可信的数字知识库中收集的207个模型和22种方法的MAI,并建立了模型排行榜。基于这个排名,我们简要探讨了开源与闭源模型的比例表示,并进一步研究了模型在不同开源许可中的分布。这些发现为学术界内外的模型选择和优化提供了支持,同时为开源生态系统的发展提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Academic influence index evaluation report of geographic simulation models (2023)
As the availability and number of geographic simulation models across various domains have surged, evaluating their relative value has become increasingly challenging. Traditional model evaluation typically involves comparing simulation results with measured data or outputs from other models. In contrast to these traditional approaches, this report continues the application of the “Model Academic Influence Index (MAI)” method from the previous year, which assesses the relative value of the model from the perspective of academic influence, emphasizing its academic contributions. We evaluate the MAI of 207 models and 22 methods collected from credible digital repositories in 2023 and establish a model leaderboard. Based on this ranking, we briefly explore the proportional representation of open-source versus closed-source models and further investigate the distribution of models across different open-source licenses. These findings provide support for model selection and optimization within the academic community and beyond, while offering new insights into the development of the open-source ecosystem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Modelling & Software
Environmental Modelling & Software 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
241
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Modelling & Software publishes contributions, in the form of research articles, reviews and short communications, on recent advances in environmental modelling and/or software. The aim is to improve our capacity to represent, understand, predict or manage the behaviour of environmental systems at all practical scales, and to communicate those improvements to a wide scientific and professional audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信