Dichen Liu , Fengyuan Zhang , Kai Xu , Daniel P. Ames , Albert J. Kettner , C. Michael Barton , Anthony J. Jakeman , Min Chen
{"title":"地理模拟模型学术影响力指标评价报告(2023年)","authors":"Dichen Liu , Fengyuan Zhang , Kai Xu , Daniel P. Ames , Albert J. Kettner , C. Michael Barton , Anthony J. Jakeman , Min Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the availability and number of geographic simulation models across various domains have surged, evaluating their relative value has become increasingly challenging. Traditional model evaluation typically involves comparing simulation results with measured data or outputs from other models. In contrast to these traditional approaches, this report continues the application of the “Model Academic Influence Index (MAI)” method from the previous year, which assesses the relative value of the model from the perspective of academic influence, emphasizing its academic contributions. We evaluate the MAI of 207 models and 22 methods collected from credible digital repositories in 2023 and establish a model leaderboard. Based on this ranking, we briefly explore the proportional representation of open-source versus closed-source models and further investigate the distribution of models across different open-source licenses. These findings provide support for model selection and optimization within the academic community and beyond, while offering new insights into the development of the open-source ecosystem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":310,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Modelling & Software","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 106737"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic influence index evaluation report of geographic simulation models (2023)\",\"authors\":\"Dichen Liu , Fengyuan Zhang , Kai Xu , Daniel P. Ames , Albert J. Kettner , C. Michael Barton , Anthony J. Jakeman , Min Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the availability and number of geographic simulation models across various domains have surged, evaluating their relative value has become increasingly challenging. Traditional model evaluation typically involves comparing simulation results with measured data or outputs from other models. In contrast to these traditional approaches, this report continues the application of the “Model Academic Influence Index (MAI)” method from the previous year, which assesses the relative value of the model from the perspective of academic influence, emphasizing its academic contributions. We evaluate the MAI of 207 models and 22 methods collected from credible digital repositories in 2023 and establish a model leaderboard. Based on this ranking, we briefly explore the proportional representation of open-source versus closed-source models and further investigate the distribution of models across different open-source licenses. These findings provide support for model selection and optimization within the academic community and beyond, while offering new insights into the development of the open-source ecosystem.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Modelling & Software\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Modelling & Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815225004219\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Modelling & Software","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815225004219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Academic influence index evaluation report of geographic simulation models (2023)
As the availability and number of geographic simulation models across various domains have surged, evaluating their relative value has become increasingly challenging. Traditional model evaluation typically involves comparing simulation results with measured data or outputs from other models. In contrast to these traditional approaches, this report continues the application of the “Model Academic Influence Index (MAI)” method from the previous year, which assesses the relative value of the model from the perspective of academic influence, emphasizing its academic contributions. We evaluate the MAI of 207 models and 22 methods collected from credible digital repositories in 2023 and establish a model leaderboard. Based on this ranking, we briefly explore the proportional representation of open-source versus closed-source models and further investigate the distribution of models across different open-source licenses. These findings provide support for model selection and optimization within the academic community and beyond, while offering new insights into the development of the open-source ecosystem.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Modelling & Software publishes contributions, in the form of research articles, reviews and short communications, on recent advances in environmental modelling and/or software. The aim is to improve our capacity to represent, understand, predict or manage the behaviour of environmental systems at all practical scales, and to communicate those improvements to a wide scientific and professional audience.