客观频闪喉镜测量与患者评分与治疗建议之间的关系。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Sheila V Stager, Adam Ciarleglio, Steven A Bielamowicz
{"title":"客观频闪喉镜测量与患者评分与治疗建议之间的关系。","authors":"Sheila V Stager, Adam Ciarleglio, Steven A Bielamowicz","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.09.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives/hypotheses: </strong>To use principal component analysis (PCA), including objective laryngostroboscopic measures and patient-reported quality of life and symptom severity ratings from initial evaluations of patients with presbylarynges as an initial step toward developing a framework for streamlining specific treatment recommendations, especially for those who might benefit initially from procedural intervention (PI), as well as patient compliance with those recommendations.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>The design was retrospective, analytical, observational, and cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred eighteen patients with presbylarynges evaluated by one laryngologist participated. Variables included normalized glottal gap area (NGGA), normalized true vocal fold width (NTVFW), total bowing index (Total BI) from single laryngostroboscopic images, multi-item ratings [Glottal Function Index (GFI), Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL)], single-item ratings (effort, weakness, hoarseness, swallowing, and breathing), and age. Associations between variables and treatment recommendation were assessed using bivariate tests followed by multinomial logistic regression, and between variables and compliance using bivariate tests followed by binomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>V-RQOL, GFI, effort, weakness, and hoarseness significantly differed between treatment groups. More severe ratings of GFI, V-RQOL, effort, weakness, and hoarseness were associated with greater odds of either intervention being recommended over observation. More severe hoarseness ratings were associated with greater odds of recommending PIs over voice therapy (VT). Two principal components (PC1, PC2) were revealed. PC1 represented patient satisfaction with voice quality and less severe vocal symptoms. PC2 represented laryngeal impairment. Using a multivariable logistic model (PC1, PC2, and sex), lower values of PC1 and being male were associated with greater odds of being recommended for either intervention compared with observation. None of the predictors considered were significantly associated with compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This initial attempt using data from a single clinic found significant differences in patient ratings between treatment options and significant associations between variables associated with treatment recommendation. The associations were ultimately not predictive for either treatment recommendations or compliance for patients with presbylarynges.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships Between Objective Laryngostroboscopic Measures and Patient Ratings With Treatment Recommendations for Patients With Presbylarynges.\",\"authors\":\"Sheila V Stager, Adam Ciarleglio, Steven A Bielamowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.09.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives/hypotheses: </strong>To use principal component analysis (PCA), including objective laryngostroboscopic measures and patient-reported quality of life and symptom severity ratings from initial evaluations of patients with presbylarynges as an initial step toward developing a framework for streamlining specific treatment recommendations, especially for those who might benefit initially from procedural intervention (PI), as well as patient compliance with those recommendations.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>The design was retrospective, analytical, observational, and cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred eighteen patients with presbylarynges evaluated by one laryngologist participated. Variables included normalized glottal gap area (NGGA), normalized true vocal fold width (NTVFW), total bowing index (Total BI) from single laryngostroboscopic images, multi-item ratings [Glottal Function Index (GFI), Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL)], single-item ratings (effort, weakness, hoarseness, swallowing, and breathing), and age. Associations between variables and treatment recommendation were assessed using bivariate tests followed by multinomial logistic regression, and between variables and compliance using bivariate tests followed by binomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>V-RQOL, GFI, effort, weakness, and hoarseness significantly differed between treatment groups. More severe ratings of GFI, V-RQOL, effort, weakness, and hoarseness were associated with greater odds of either intervention being recommended over observation. More severe hoarseness ratings were associated with greater odds of recommending PIs over voice therapy (VT). Two principal components (PC1, PC2) were revealed. PC1 represented patient satisfaction with voice quality and less severe vocal symptoms. PC2 represented laryngeal impairment. Using a multivariable logistic model (PC1, PC2, and sex), lower values of PC1 and being male were associated with greater odds of being recommended for either intervention compared with observation. None of the predictors considered were significantly associated with compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This initial attempt using data from a single clinic found significant differences in patient ratings between treatment options and significant associations between variables associated with treatment recommendation. The associations were ultimately not predictive for either treatment recommendations or compliance for patients with presbylarynges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.09.037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.09.037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/假设:利用主成分分析(PCA),包括客观的喉频闪测量和患者报告的生活质量和症状严重程度评分,对喉部老年性喉炎患者进行初步评估,作为制定简化特定治疗建议框架的第一步,特别是对那些最初可能受益于程序性干预(PI)的患者,以及患者对这些建议的依从性。研究设计:采用回顾性、分析性、观察性和横断面设计。方法:对由一名喉科医师评估的118例喉老患者进行调查。变量包括归一化声门间隙面积(NGGA)、归一化真声带宽度(NTVFW)、单喉频响图像的总弯曲指数(total BI)、多项目评分[声门功能指数(GFI)、语音相关生活质量(V-RQOL)]、单项评分(用力、虚弱、声音沙哑、吞咽和呼吸)和年龄。采用双变量检验和多项逻辑回归评估变量与治疗建议之间的关系,采用双变量检验和二项逻辑回归评估变量与依从性之间的关系。结果:两组间V-RQOL、GFI、用力、无力、沙哑均有显著性差异。GFI、V-RQOL、努力程度、虚弱程度和声音嘶哑评分越严重,推荐干预措施的可能性越大。更严重的沙哑评分与更大的几率推荐PIs而不是声音治疗(VT)相关。两个主成分(PC1, PC2)显示。PC1代表患者对语音质量的满意度和较轻的声音症状。PC2代表喉部损伤。使用多变量逻辑模型(PC1、PC2和性别),与观察结果相比,PC1值较低和男性被推荐进行任何干预的几率较大。所有考虑的预测因素均与依从性无显著相关性。结论:该初步尝试使用来自单个诊所的数据,发现治疗方案之间的患者评分存在显著差异,与治疗推荐相关的变量之间存在显著关联。这些关联最终不能预测对喉老患者的治疗建议或依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationships Between Objective Laryngostroboscopic Measures and Patient Ratings With Treatment Recommendations for Patients With Presbylarynges.

Objectives/hypotheses: To use principal component analysis (PCA), including objective laryngostroboscopic measures and patient-reported quality of life and symptom severity ratings from initial evaluations of patients with presbylarynges as an initial step toward developing a framework for streamlining specific treatment recommendations, especially for those who might benefit initially from procedural intervention (PI), as well as patient compliance with those recommendations.

Research design: The design was retrospective, analytical, observational, and cross-sectional.

Methods: One hundred eighteen patients with presbylarynges evaluated by one laryngologist participated. Variables included normalized glottal gap area (NGGA), normalized true vocal fold width (NTVFW), total bowing index (Total BI) from single laryngostroboscopic images, multi-item ratings [Glottal Function Index (GFI), Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL)], single-item ratings (effort, weakness, hoarseness, swallowing, and breathing), and age. Associations between variables and treatment recommendation were assessed using bivariate tests followed by multinomial logistic regression, and between variables and compliance using bivariate tests followed by binomial logistic regression.

Results: V-RQOL, GFI, effort, weakness, and hoarseness significantly differed between treatment groups. More severe ratings of GFI, V-RQOL, effort, weakness, and hoarseness were associated with greater odds of either intervention being recommended over observation. More severe hoarseness ratings were associated with greater odds of recommending PIs over voice therapy (VT). Two principal components (PC1, PC2) were revealed. PC1 represented patient satisfaction with voice quality and less severe vocal symptoms. PC2 represented laryngeal impairment. Using a multivariable logistic model (PC1, PC2, and sex), lower values of PC1 and being male were associated with greater odds of being recommended for either intervention compared with observation. None of the predictors considered were significantly associated with compliance.

Conclusions: This initial attempt using data from a single clinic found significant differences in patient ratings between treatment options and significant associations between variables associated with treatment recommendation. The associations were ultimately not predictive for either treatment recommendations or compliance for patients with presbylarynges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信